ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Electronic cigarettes .
-
mazza111
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 877
- Joined: 09 Mar 2010, 16:30
- Gender: Female
Re: Electronic cigarettes .
If you're going to attempt to quit with the ecig, the only thing I can say is get the full kit. The batteries on the ones that look like cigs are pants and only last a few weeks.
But yes, you do get the same hit from them as you would a normal cig. Some interesting flavours in the liquids too. I only got as brave as trying the liquorice one, but it was quite nice. So, don't be put off by flavoured cigs the way I was. You may be surprised.
But yes, you do get the same hit from them as you would a normal cig. Some interesting flavours in the liquids too. I only got as brave as trying the liquorice one, but it was quite nice. So, don't be put off by flavoured cigs the way I was. You may be surprised.
-
Himaggen
- Posts: 993
- Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 23:40
Re: Electronic cigarettes .
This has got nothing to do with harm to health, its about a basic principal we all need to remember.Lounge Lizard wrote:So might drinking coffee harm your colleagues health ?![]()
And do you have the same attitude to drinking water as drinking coffee ?
- We are paid to do a job for a specified amount of time. When employed we agreed to do that work for a wage with concessions. Those concessions are generally fought for and won by our Unions. The specific concessions are that we are entitled to paid for 'break(s)' of greater length than the legal minimum and that we should have access to drinking water, (not coffee).
You don't deserve more than that and you aren't entitled to more than that just because you have a drug problem and you're trying to quit. Royal Mail are not obliged or responsible for you quitting just as they weren't responsible for you starting the habit in the first instance.
-
Talell
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 16 Aug 2010, 22:31
- Gender: Male
Re: Electronic cigarettes .
Oh boy, here we go.Himaggen wrote:You don't deserve more than that and you aren't entitled to more than that just because you have a drug problem and you're trying to quit. Royal Mail are not obliged or responsible for you quitting just as they weren't responsible for you starting the habit in the first instance.[/list]
I'll end with a question; Do you believe that seeing people in the workplace smoking what appears to be a cigarette helps other smokers to quit or potentially peer pressures others to start smoking?
You are right, I am not entitled to take a cup of coffee onto the floor with me. Do I deserve to take a cup of coffee onto the floor with me? Depends on various criteria that are open to abuse and therefore should be abhorred. Is it reasonable for me to take a cup of coffee with me onto the floor, assuming the impact it has on my work is minimal? Yes. So why can't I take a cup of coffee onto the floor with me, when it is a reasonable concession to make by the employer at negligible cost?
Smoke breaks are more complicated, because there is a real lost time argument. But again all you have to do is determine what is reasonable. Is it reasonable for someone to run for a smoke during 5mins downtime, when they have 2 or so hours until their break (assuming this is 1-2 hours into their duty? I would argue it is because of the same criteria as the cup of coffee. Is it reasonable for someone to go for a smoke, on the hour every hour, regardless of the work profile? I personally would say no, it isn't.
Also with the smoking aid, it is a boon for any company if someone decides to use a smoking aid that can be used indoors. Think about it: the employee is highly unlikely to take unsolicited smoke breaks leading to full use of production time; the employee is probably using it to quit smoking, leading to better health and attendance in the future; and it could encourage other employee's who smoke to quit, since there is visual feedback on what it is like etc.
We aren't children, there would be no peer pressure to start smoking, in fact there isn't now. I haven't met a smoker who hasn't regretted starting.
-
Lounge Lizard
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 9458
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54
Re: Electronic cigarettes .
That we should have access to drinking water is a basic right and for you to suggest that coffee, which is about 98% drinking water, is fundamentally different to water is pathetic. I wouldn't go so far as to suggest I drink a wholesome pint of beer, which is about 96% drinking water, while sorting because others might suggest there's something of a health and safety issue with doing that. For many years in a previous job I suffered years of sharing an office with a chain smoker and you just had to put up with that sort of thing back then. Things have gone from one extreme to another, common sense being conspicuosly absent.Himaggen wrote:This has got nothing to do with harm to health, its about a basic principal we all need to remember.Lounge Lizard wrote:So might drinking coffee harm your colleagues health ?![]()
And do you have the same attitude to drinking water as drinking coffee ?I'll end with a question; Do you believe that seeing people in the workplace smoking what appears to be a cigarette helps other smokers to quit or potentially peer pressures others to start smoking?
- We are paid to do a job for a specified amount of time. When employed we agreed to do that work for a wage with concessions. Those concessions are generally fought for and won by our Unions. The specific concessions are that we are entitled to paid for 'break(s)' of greater length than the legal minimum and that we should have access to drinking water, (not coffee).
You don't deserve more than that and you aren't entitled to more than that just because you have a drug problem and you're trying to quit. Royal Mail are not obliged or responsible for you quitting just as they weren't responsible for you starting the habit in the first instance.
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: Electronic cigarettes .
Employers will have to be very careful with this.
An e-cig is just a fancy nicotine inhaler and those are prescribed by doctors.
If you plan to ban the use of any smoking cessation aid in the workplace you had better take a great deal of legal advice beforehand.
An e-cig is just a fancy nicotine inhaler and those are prescribed by doctors.
If you plan to ban the use of any smoking cessation aid in the workplace you had better take a great deal of legal advice beforehand.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
Himaggen
- Posts: 993
- Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 23:40
Re: Electronic cigarettes .
There is no evidence provided by an approved body to show this as an effective smoking cessation device.
It is simply a device used for rapid drug intake.
It is simply a device used for rapid drug intake.
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: Electronic cigarettes .
A little over-dramatic Himaggen.Himaggen wrote:There is no evidence provided by an approved body to show this as an effective smoking cessation device.
It is simply a device used for rapid drug intake.
Codeine is a drug...so is paracetamol,energy drinks are full of "drugs"...most things you stuff down your neck are.
Does that mean a can of Red Bull is simply a device used for rapid drug intake.
Nicotine is not illegal and used with an e-cig it is not harmful to anyone else...stop trying to make it sound like crack cocaine.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
mazza111
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 877
- Joined: 09 Mar 2010, 16:30
- Gender: Female
Re: Electronic cigarettes .
The difference is, ecigs are not an approved smoking cessassion aid. Nic inhalators are. Therefore they could be classed as medicinal.
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: Electronic cigarettes .
It's a fine line and if they continue to rise in popularity,one that's likely to change.mazza111 wrote:The difference is, ecigs are not an approved smoking cessassion aid. Nic inhalators are. Therefore they could be classed as medicinal.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
Lounge Lizard
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 9458
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54
Re: Electronic cigarettes .
Caffeine is a drug so perhaps I should have a weaker cup of coffee while I'm sortingfishtank wrote:A little over-dramatic Himaggen.Himaggen wrote:There is no evidence provided by an approved body to show this as an effective smoking cessation device.
It is simply a device used for rapid drug intake.
Codeine is a drug...so is paracetamol,energy drinks are full of "drugs"...most things you stuff down your neck are.
Does that mean a can of Red Bull is simply a device used for rapid drug intake.
Nicotine is not illegal and used with an e-cig it is not harmful to anyone else...stop trying to make it sound like crack cocaine.
[1] All-cause mortality.
[2] Reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease and Dementia
[3] Reduced risk of gallstone disease
[4] Reduced risk of Parkinson's disease
[5] Cognitive performance
Likewise, in tests of simple reaction time, choice reaction time, incidental verbal memory, and visuospatial reasoning, participants who regularly drank coffee were found to perform better on all tests, with a positive relationship between test scores and the amount of coffee regularly drunk. Elderly participants were found to have the largest effect associated with regular coffee drinking. Another study found that women over the age of 80 performed significantly better on cognitive tests if they had regularly drunk coffee over their lifetimes.
[6] Analgesic property
[7] Antidiabetic
[8] Liver protection
[9] Cancer
[10] Cardioprotective
[11] Laxative/diuretic
Contrary to popular belief, caffeine does not act as a diuretic when consumed in moderation (less than five cups a day or 500 to 600 milligrams), and does not lead to dehydration or to a water-electrolyte imbalance; current evidence suggests that caffeinated beverages contribute to the body's daily fluid requirements no differently from pure water.
[12] Antioxidant
[13] Prevention of dental caries
[14] Gout
[15] Blood pressure
And I doubt if even FOREST can come up with fifteen health benefits of smoking tobacco.
-
mazza111
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 877
- Joined: 09 Mar 2010, 16:30
- Gender: Female
Re: Electronic cigarettes .
My gallstones are telling me that I've had my quota of coffee already for the day 
-
Talell
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 16 Aug 2010, 22:31
- Gender: Male
Re: Electronic cigarettes .
Citation required.Himaggen wrote:It is simply a device used for rapid drug intake.
-
monkeymutha
- Posts: 317
- Joined: 15 Mar 2012, 18:00
- Gender: Female
- Location: At the bottom of the bottomless pit
Re: Electronic cigarettes .
I recommend the Nicorette Quickmist to get you off fags. Though it is very addictive in itself and I have been using it for over a year now.
-
somerset
- Posts: 582
- Joined: 08 Jun 2007, 16:23
Re: Electronic cigarettes .
fishtank wrote:A little over-dramatic Himaggen.Himaggen wrote:There is no evidence provided by an approved body to show this as an effective smoking cessation device.
It is simply a device used for rapid drug intake.
Codeine is a drug...so is paracetamol,energy drinks are full of "drugs"...most things you stuff down your neck are.
Does that mean a can of Red Bull is simply a device used for rapid drug intake.
Nicotine is not illegal and used with an e-cig it is not harmful to anyone else...stop trying to make it sound like crack cocaine.
-
AlbertoGranado
- Posts: 57
- Joined: 25 Apr 2010, 15:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: Under Neon Loneliness
Re: Electronic cigarettes .
And here we have the reason for the decline in mail volumesomerset wrote:Back in my day we did not have electronic gadgets like this to discuss topics .We had things called a telephone or sent a letter !DGP1 wrote:Back in my day we didn't have all these electronic gadgets, what's wrong with a hoop and a stick