OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION:LIST

[Hitcher]

Trolleys are provided to cover RM's arse so they dont get done for compensation claims.
If you do your back in they will say that we provide you with trolleys for Health and Safety but you chose not to use them.

So they're no longer mandatory?

[TrueBlueTerrier]

Trolleys are provided to cover RM's arse so they dont get done for compensation claims.
If you do your back in they will say that we provide you with trolleys for Health and Safety but you chose not to use them.

So they're no longer mandatory?

Yes they are Mandatory still. The emphasis Eastie is applying is that if you ignore a Mandatory instruction to use the trollies and injure yourself using unathorised methods, then a lot of the blame in any compensation claim, or investigation, will be laid at your feet.

However, if Managers are not seen enforcing, instructing or educating workers (as in turning a blind eye because the work gets done) then they themselves could be held partially liable - thats until the Cons change the laws and cut the red-tape

it is not enough just to have health and safety measures in place, but is vital to enforce, review and audit them.

[Stormproof]

UP TO 100 NOW. If you are from any of these offices and the revision is now working please let us know so we can adjust the list.

Is your office failing with the new revision? PM me the office and Postcode (as most cities have more than 1 office)for anonymity and I'll put it on the list. Lets see how many are failing and have'nt hit the headlines yet. I don't want to put in the reports from the press just yet, rather it was from the horses mouth

If your office is in the list and is not failing anymore then please let us know.

1. BARNSLEY DO
2. STRATFORD UPON AVON DO
3. DUNDEE EAST DO
4. BARROW-IN-FURNESS DO LA13-LA17 Working
5. LIVINGSTON DO
6. LEEDS LS1/LS2 DO
7. TROON DO
8. BEITH DO
9. DALRY DO
10. KILWINNING DO
11. NORTH WEST DO M27/M28/M38
12. CREWE DO
13. GARSTANG DO PR3
14. SHEEPSCAR DO LS6/LS7
15. DENTON DO M34
16. ADDLESTONE DO KT15
17. BRAMLEY DO LS13
18. RAYLEIGH DO SS
19. WARWICK DO
20. DEWSBURY DO
21. BELFAST DO Tomb St BT7
22. PETERLEE DO
23. SUNDERLAND DO
24. GATESHEAD DO
25. DINNINGTON DO Sheffield
26. CARLISLE DO CA1
27. MORECAMBE DO
28. HERNE BAY DO CT6
29. CALDERWAY DO WF13/14
30. FAVERSHAM DO
31. MAIDSTONE DO ME14/15/16
32. NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE(WEST) DO
33. STROUD DO GL6 Working 95+% of the time
34. DARWEN DO BB3
35. LEIGH DO
36. RUNCORN DO
37. ST HELENS DO
38. HYTHE DO CT21
39. WIGAN DO
40. MILTON KEYNES MK1-16
41. BOGNOR REGIS LDO PO21
42. EDGWARE DO (HA)
43. PINNER DO (HA) Part Revision- Failed
44. SALISBURY DO
45. ANDOVER DO
46. EASTLEIGH DO
47. ASHTON-UNDER-LYNE DO
48. CHESTERFIELD DO S40 1AA
49. BLACKPOOL DO
50. ROCHDALE DO OL16
51. ABERDEEN ALTENS
52. HOYLAKE DO CH47
53. NEWTONABBEY DO BT36
54. POLEGATE BN26
55. EASTBOURNE BN21
56. CHRISTCHURCH DO BH23
57. CAMBRIDGE DOCB4
58. BOOTLE DO l21-23
59. ROTHERHAM DO
60. NEWHAVEN DO BN9
61. WESTHAM DO BN23
62. SANDWICH CT13
63. PRESTON SOUTH DO
64. TWICKENHAM DO TW1 & TW2
65. GRIMSBY DO
66. HALFWAY DO
67. BOURNEMOUTH DO BH1-3 & BH5-8
68. OLNEY DO MK46
69. LANCASTER DO LA1
70. WAKEFIELD DO
71. ILKESTON DO
72. DUDLEY DO DY1/DY2/DY3
73. DELL DO EDINBURGH
74. BEXHILL DO
75. REDCAR DO TS10
76. NEW FERRY DO CH62
77. PRENTO DO CH43
78. SOLIHULL DO
79. KENILWORTH DO
80. PORTSMOUTH DO
81. BENFLEET DO SS7
82. BURY DO BL0
83. WEST PARK DO PLYMOUTH PL5
84. SWANSCOMBE DO DA10
85. NEWRY DO NI
86. ST AUSTELL PL25
87. ELLESMERE PORT CH65 & 66
88. STAFFORD DO ST16/17/18/19/20/21
89. BASILDON DO SS14
90. BRIGHTON DO
91. BANBURY DO
92. INVERCLYDE DO PA14-19
93. COSHAM PO6
94. ORPINGTON DO BR6
95. WALLASEY DO CH44/45
97. ASHFORD
98. TAUNTON DO TA2 TA3/4
99. BELPER DO
100.HULL HU5

[DGP1]

It can't be 100.............dingo said so

[dvbuk55]

It can't be 100.............dingo said so

Well he did say a few were failing and considering he was under the impression a 1000 had taken place as opposed to the 390 or so, a 100 could be a few.
Still it is indicative as to how well the revision process is progressing if only 2 out of the 100 have moved on to be succesful. Even an idiot would recognise that there is a fundamental problem with the process and it is needed to go back to square one to re-evalute the whole process.

[DGP1]

It can't be 100.............dingo said so

Well he did say a few were failing and considering he was under the impression a 1000 had taken place as opposed to the 390 or so, a 100 could be a few.
Still it is indicative as to how well the revision process is progressing if only 2 out of the 100 have moved on to be succesful. Even an idiot would recognise that there is a fundamental problem with the process and it is needed to go back to square one to re-evalute the whole process.

But you have to remember that there is no plan b


Although I did see him in a film called Harry Brown

[dvbuk55]

It can't be 100.............dingo said so

Well he did say a few were failing and considering he was under the impression a 1000 had taken place as opposed to the 390 or so, a 100 could be a few.
Still it is indicative as to how well the revision process is progressing if only 2 out of the 100 have moved on to be succesful. Even an idiot would recognise that there is a fundamental problem with the process and it is needed to go back to square one to re-evalute the whole process.

But you have to remember that there is no plan b


Although I did see him in a film called Harry Brown

Well there was but they didn't think to communicate it to the members and in fact it was only mentioned a year down the line It was more a question of RM want this and that's it, although they spent 5 months ironing out the details, two years down the line there's still quite a few creases.

[Thixty]

you can add East Kilbride G74/G75 to the list

[skull]

Still it is indicative as to how well the revision process is progressing if only 2 out of the 100 have moved on to be succesful.

Since the lapsing started the Barrow-in-Furness office is really on shaky ground and just stuttering along. I'll keep you posted and let you know if you need to revise your figures down to one. I don't want the office to fail because we've had a pretty good atmosphere in the last nine months. Staff are now starting to show signs of stress and that really puts a spanner in the works:nervous

[POSTMAN]

To be fair we can only put put up/edit what peeps tell us on here,some may have changed......................some may have not.
If Lang or Haddon are still lurking in,give us an update guys.
And any chance we can have conformation or not that our 100 is the same as Moya's.

[Stormproof]

And any chance we can have conformation or not that our 100 is the same as Moya's.

Perhaps Moya is using our list

[POSTMAN]

And any chance we can have conformation or not that our 100 is the same as Moya's.

Perhaps Moya is using our list

[skull]

And any chance we can have conformation or not that our 100 is the same as Moya's.

Perhaps Moya is using our list

Moya's list will be under her office carpet.

[dvbuk55]

I would imagine Moyas perception of a failing office and the workers perception are totally different.

[fishtank]

I would imagine Moyas perception of a failing office and the workers perception are totally different.

I would like to know what CWU HQ's perception of a failing office is and whether it is closer to Moya's vision or there own membership's.