write to Billy hays and Dave ward etc

[stephen500]

I would encourage everyone to send an e-mail to the above, i will put the e-mail addressed here.
bhayes@cwu.org
dward@cwu.org
tkearns@cwu.org
If you want you can copy it to the Nec which as far as i know are shown below
all at @cwu.org
STEVE BAGULEY
JOHN BALDWIN
JEREMY BAUGH
MICHELE EMERSON
DAVE JOYCE
TRISH LAVELLE
STEPHEN GRIBBEN JNR
SIMON SAPPER
TONY RUPA
KEVIN SLOCOMBE
CAROL ALCOCK
MARK BAULCH
EDDIE BEESE
DAVE BOWMAN
PHIL BROWNE
NORMAN CANDY
GRAHAM COLK
PETE DONAGHY
ALLAN ELDRED
MARIA EXALL
JOHN FARNAN
STEVE FISHWICK
GARY JONES
STEVE JONES
PETE KEENLYSIDE
ANDY KERR
JANE LOFTUS
JOE MALONE
NOEL McCLEAN
LESLEY McLEAN
COLIN O’CALLAGHAN
PAT O’HARA
DAVIE ROBERTSON
BERNARD ROOME
BERYL SHEPHERD
ANDREA SNOWDEN
MARK TAGGART
IAN WARD
DAVE WARREN
I have written a letter reproduced below:
''Dear Billy and Dave, Please do not even consider tabling proposals that are in any shape or form like the rejected agreement. There is a lot of anger about the rejected agreement and if the cwu come back with anything like it i would suggest it would be rejected by the membership. We all know Royal Mail have put forward their worse proposals and hope that you come back and accept most of them. They ask for counter proposals, how can you come up with proposals? You could just end up doing managements' job for them.
There is also the matter of the clock ticking on the 28 days and if we are not carefull we will have to have a re-ballot. Stand firm.''

[lovejoy]

I would encourage everyone to send an e-mail to the above, i will put the e-mail addressed here.
bhayes@cwu.org
dward@cwu.org
tkearns@cwu.org
If you want you can copy it to the Nec which as far as i know are shown below
all at @cwu.org
STEVE BAGULEY
JOHN BALDWIN
JEREMY BAUGH
MICHELE EMERSON
DAVE JOYCE
TRISH LAVELLE
STEPHEN GRIBBEN JNR
SIMON SAPPER
TONY RUPA
KEVIN SLOCOMBE
CAROL ALCOCK
MARK BAULCH
EDDIE BEESE
DAVE BOWMAN
PHIL BROWNE
NORMAN CANDY
GRAHAM COLK
PETE DONAGHY
ALLAN ELDRED
MARIA EXALL
JOHN FARNAN
STEVE FISHWICK
GARY JONES
STEVE JONES
PETE KEENLYSIDE
ANDY KERR
JANE LOFTUS
JOE MALONE
NOEL McCLEAN
LESLEY McLEAN
COLIN O’CALLAGHAN
PAT O’HARA
DAVIE ROBERTSON
BERNARD ROOME
BERYL SHEPHERD
ANDREA SNOWDEN
MARK TAGGART
IAN WARD
DAVE WARREN
I have written a letter reproduced below:
''Dear Billy and Dave, Please do not even consider tabling proposals that are in any shape or form like the rejected agreement. There is a lot of anger about the rejected agreement and if the cwu come back with anything like it i would suggest it would be rejected by the membership. We all know Royal Mail have put forward their worse proposals and hope that you come back and accept most of them. They ask for counter proposals, how can you come up with proposals? You could just end up doing managements' job for them.
There is also the matter of the clock ticking on the 28 days and if we are not carefull we will have to have a re-ballot. Stand firm.''

fair post steve but it has been made clear that we will not have to reballot! our ballot is live and will remain so until the dispute is settled

[stephen500]

I hope you are right, i just thought now that the period of calm is over that the clock starts ticking again. If i am right then perhaps its a bluff by Rm to force a re-ballot.
Any way regardless i still suggest that we e-mail all the union officers on our thoughts regarding the current position and suggest our 'way forward'!

[ulster postie]

I SENT OUR GREAT LEADER BILLY AN E/MAIL LAST WEEK AND GUESS WHAT HE HASNT REPLIED, FUNNY THAT, TOTAL WASTE OF SPACE P.S. JUST LIKE HIS DRINKING BUDDY HE SENT OVER HERE TO RUN OUR BRANCH, LARGER OHARA.

[andy2007]

I SENT OUR GREAT LEADER BILLY AN E/MAIL LAST WEEK AND GUESS WHAT HE HASNT REPLIED, FUNNY THAT, TOTAL WASTE OF SPACE P.S. JUST LIKE HIS DRINKING BUDDY HE SENT OVER HERE TO RUN OUR BRANCH, LARGER OHARA.

I did the same a while ago. I did get a reply eventually. But is was from someone else, replying on his behalf. And was fobbed off anyway.

Still, the more of us that Email them, the greater the chances of getting a useful response. After all. Individuals can be ignored, but a concerted Email campaign is much harder to brush under the carpet!

[dvbuk55]

I sent an e mail last week in response to an e mail from them.


The email simply asked the question what was going to be done about the early starts - I received a stock reply pointing me in the direction of an LTB - I thanked the sender and replied that the LTB didn't explain what the unions position on early starts was.

The next e mail asked for my union number or home address - now why on earth would they need that? Unless of course they have a "circle of unfriends" list. Needless to say I won't be e mailing them - I think they go straight in their Spam box.