In order to qualify for all parts of Working Tax Credits, the worker receiving the payment has to typically work 30 hours per week (note it does not talk about what you are paid during holiday weeks and "typically" can be taken to mean that on average working weeks excluding holiday 30 hours are worked. Given that us posties are paid nearly £9 per hour at standard rate (excluding S/A and o/t), average 30-hour weeks over 48 weeks (i.e. excluding basic 4 week holiday entitlement) will bring home ~£13000 gross minimum (more for 22.5 doing 7.5 hours o/t on average per week) and the upper threshold is ~£17000 for receiving any WTC, receivers are never going to become millionairs!
Something worth noting is that normally WTC is based on your previous financial year's gross pay, but if you expect to bring in less than the previous year, payments are based on the current tax year and this is where such recipients have to be very careful at how much o/t they choose to do. For PT staff who are more likely to do prep and major extended delivery during Xmas pressure, those few weeks can make a massive difference to the average hours worked, often meaning they need to refuse o/t towards the end of the tax year in March... Otherwise they get paid extra by RM (in an ideal world with no fudging of docket sheets), only to end up with an overpayment of WTC which sends that extra money straight to HMRC.
I'm sure many are in the same boat as myself, but I hate how pre-P&L I can easily attain a 30-hour average working week (to get all WTC entitlements), yet when the P&L revision kicks in managers are saying they cannot increase the contract hours to 30. All we want is a decent wage with holiday and sick pay based on what we actually work (upto 39/40 hours) rather than these pathetic unachievable PT contracts, I'm persoanlly looking forward to landing them in it legitimately come P&L... Why would I want to do o/t after a 7.5 hour day, or come in on a day off to bail them out on the heavy days?
