Indoor flow:Doc:Key aspects and deployment requirements

[POSTMAN]

flow1.ppt

[fishtank]

Is this agreed?

[Glenno]

Don't see the Logo FT so I take it it is NOT a joint project

[fishtank]

It does say though...

Review of concerns raised by CWU of potential fatigue/muscular skeletal risks caused by the new work methods

In line with Rob Jenson/Bob Gibson joint statement, full involvement of CWU local reps/ASRs through planning and deployment

Involvement of CWU Nationally at early stage of any future operational equipment design reviews

As far as i was aware those were 3 of the main sticking points that led to the withdrawal of involvement in the first place.

[motherhubbard]

It does say though...

Review of concerns raised by CWU of potential fatigue/muscular skeletal risks caused by the new work methods

In line with Rob Jenson/Bob Gibson joint statement, full involvement of CWU local reps/ASRs through planning and deployment

Involvement of CWU Nationally at early stage of any future operational equipment design reviews

As far as i was aware those were 3 of the main sticking points that led to the withdrawal of involvement in the first place.

Doesn't alter the fact - it is a crock of shite.

[fishtank]

Doesn't alter the fact - it is a crock of shite.

Mother your language is atrocious but you are of course right it is a crock of shite.
Probably very expensive too...the crock...not the shite.

[Glenno]

Looks like someones jumped the gun

[fishtank]

It does mention this though...

Longer term fatigue risks will be monitored/reviewed on an ongoing basis through the existing “Long term study of Delivery role” review.

I honestly thought that had been shelved due to cost.
I hope it's not too "long term".
I want to live to see it.

[POSTMAN]

Is this agreed?

Came out by accident.

[Glenno]

Lovin it

[PhilthyPhil]

I don't get the point of sorting packets into mini yorks instead of DBF. It takes up more space, you can get less people sorting in a bullring than at a DBF and when you get the packets to your frame you are constantly bending and twisting while sorting the packets rather than just being able to tip the sack out onto the frame.

[dvbuk55]

Well we are still in limbo really is this agreed or not - and if it is, then what has been the point of chattering again and again when the end result is exactly what RM wanted and the overall concerns of revision in delivery have still not been addressed.................we want Bob Crow, we want Bob Crow............the very next time we need an arbitrator

Is this the awaited statement from RM and is this the reason the 30th Jan meeting was cancelled and why is the union not sending out these details to the membership instead of cowering in the background, with their thumbs up their ars*s and their minds in neutral?

[Bernardson]

We have abandonend 'Flow' in our office. There was too many people playing with the mail rather than getting it sorted!
I expect it will be back in some new guise though

[POSTMAN]

We have abandonend 'Flow' in our office. There was too many people playing with the mail rather than getting it sorted!
I expect it will be back in some new guise though

You'll probably get it back when it's been agreed by the CWU and the embargo is lifted....oh hold on.

[daveyeff]

It does mention this though...

Longer term fatigue risks will be monitored/reviewed on an ongoing basis through the existing “Long term study of Delivery role” review.

I honestly thought that had been shelved due to cost.
I hope it's not too "long term".
I want to live to see it.

''LONGER TERM FATIGUE RISKS'' does this mean we,ll be shattered BEFORE we go out!!