ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Angard didn't do their vetting very well...are we surprised?

An 'unofficial' forum for those who either work for Royal Mail or are looking to work for Royal Mail through the Angard Staffing Agency.This is an open forum.
graham1980
Posts: 32
Joined: 17 Nov 2011, 10:10
Gender: Male

Angard didn't do their vetting very well...are we surprised?

Post by graham1980 »

http://www.scotsman.com/news/royal_mail ... _1_2014220" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

WORKERS with criminal records were hired to help sort through Edinburgh’s Christmas mail, the Evening News can reveal.


Six casual workers completed a week of shifts at the busy Sighthill sorting office before they were sacked when their offences came to light.

Royal Mail today said all of the 600 temporary staff hired were “closely supervised” during shifts, and the six workers – some of whom are thought to have convictions for theft – were let go as soon as Disclosure Scotland vetting checks came back.

Bosses added that protecting customer’s mail was of “paramount importance”, and the “majority” of temporary workers had been vetted before starting at the west Edinburgh facility.

But Tory councillor Jason Rust said all the checks should have been done in plenty of time.

He said: “It’s very concerning that the proper checks were not carried out in advance of these employees starting work. Obviously the Royal Mail were aware of the need for extra staff for some time, and they should have made sure people were checked properly.

“Anyone handling the mail needs to have undergone appropriate checks, and that’s especially true during the Christmas period when potentially valuable items are passing through the postal system.

“Royal Mail have taken action here, but I would hope they make preparations well in advance for next year.”

The workers completed their first shift on Saturday, but were informed on Thursday that their short-term contracts, due to run until Christmas Eve, were being terminated.

One of the sacked workers, Paul Kernachan, 22, from Slateford, said the recruitment agency which put him forward for the job told him his assault conviction would not disqualify him. Mr Kernachan said: “I applied for the job through a recruitment agency. I told them I had a criminal record and they said it wouldn’t be a problem, they had put other people forward who also had a record. They passed me on and I started work at the Sighthill depot on Saturday and everything was fine.

“I worked sorting out the letters and parcels and everything was going well. Then on Thursday I was told they were letting me go because I had a criminal record. I told them I had been honest about that and had been told it didn’t matter but that was it. I spoke to other people who were let go for the same reason. Some of them had convictions for thefts.”

Mr Kernachan, who was earning £6.08 per hour with overtime available, said he was convicted of assault last year after becoming involved in a drunken fight.

Royal Mail spokeswoman Morag Turnbull said: “Royal Mail’s Christmas recruitment campaign is the biggest of its kind anywhere in the country. We have had a tremendous response to the 18,000 temporary roles we had been seeking to fill this Christmas, with more than 110,000 applications.

“As well as its size, our recruitment of temporary workers differs from other large companies in that Royal Mail conducts a criminal records security check. We do this because of the paramount importance of protecting our customers’ mail.

“Edinburgh Mail Centre has recruited 600 temporary workers to help sort the Christmas mailbag. The majority of these temporary workers had undergone the full vetting procedure before commencing work at Royal Mail.

“On completion of the full vetting procedure, six workers were found to have failed the security check and are no longer working for Royal Mail.”
Verging
Posts: 665
Joined: 09 Dec 2011, 10:44
Gender: Female

Re: Angard didn't do their vetting very well...are we surpri

Post by Verging »

You sure we are talking Angard in this report - it does not say them directly.

As Angard have made such a mess of everything (pay, payslips, communication etc) they have also made a mess of the recruitment process. Our mail centre have people from other Agencies as well as Angard because Angard are unable to supply the numbers they need.
Please vote in the Pay Poll http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... 47&t=41499" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
markadam1962
Posts: 246
Joined: 11 Oct 2010, 17:19
Gender: Male

Re: Angard didn't do their vetting very well...are we surpri

Post by markadam1962 »

As\I posted earlier in the week Canterbury were so desperate for bodies that there was an "ask a friend, family member, dosser on the street, Ronnie Biggs, Bin Laden" plea notice by the signing in sheets.

Thorough vetting :crazy: another laughable load of cobblers from a RM corporate robot who should collect a P45 after Christmas along with the entire Angard board.
Lounge Lizard
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 9458
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54

Re: Angard didn't do their vetting very well...are we surpri

Post by Lounge Lizard »

"Royal Mail today said all of the 600 temporary staff hired were “closely supervised” during shifts, and the six workers – some of whom are thought to have convictions for theft – were let go as soon as Disclosure Scotland vetting checks came back." :shock:
Six out of 600, so statistically 99% of Edinburgh residents are good, honest people. :nana :nana :nana :nana :nana :nana
guitar-mike
Posts: 58
Joined: 14 Dec 2011, 17:15
Gender: Male

Re: Angard didn't do their vetting very well...are we surpri

Post by guitar-mike »

I'm not surprised as in my case they wouldn't have had time to vet at all. We went to an "interview" on the Thursday afternoon and asked if we would start that same night :shock: Unsurprisingly someone in our place was escorted off the premises for the opening of letters and cards.
Jobe
Posts: 43
Joined: 24 Nov 2011, 09:26
Gender: Male

Re: Angard didn't do their vetting very well...are we surpri

Post by Jobe »

My vetting took nearly a month but that's probably because I've only been out of prison 9 months. :hmmmm :crazy:
wamdue
Posts: 187
Joined: 02 Dec 2011, 12:54
Gender: Male

Re: Angard didn't do their vetting very well...are we surpri

Post by wamdue »

I know two people were escorted off the premises by the police at Peterborough, but I dont know the details.
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Angard didn't do their vetting very well...are we surpri

Post by DGP1 »

TBH this happens every year, just wait until they actually catch people stealing and they're just escorted off the premises (because RM don't want the bad publicity).
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
Spell1
Posts: 14
Joined: 26 Nov 2011, 15:46
Gender: Female

Re: Angard didn't do their vetting very well...are we surpri

Post by Spell1 »

happens every year .. people are there one day and not the next! thats when the rumour mills start turning! tbh i would prefer the agency to contact me before the embarrassment of being escorted of the premises! anyone know the location of the guy that went to the paper? was it edinburgh? feel bad for them .. but they will now be place on the recruitment register and find it hard to get a job with RM again!

so who's signing up next year lol