I asked a LM when I arrived for work this morning re late starts next week, none of the managers in my office have heard anything about them going ahead apparently.guswood wrote:I want to know officialy from CWU, do we start later start times next week or not?
I don't think we should while talks are ongoing. I just hope we get some guidance soon. !
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Latest 19:00
-
Stormproof
- Posts: 6116
- Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
- Gender: Female
So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets
Illegitimi non carborundum
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets
Illegitimi non carborundum
-
lovejoy
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59
agreedstubaby wrote:I have backed our Union to the hilt and have complete faith and Bob and Dave but i now think we should draw a line in the sand.
They are starting to take the piss out of us and it has to stop.
We should announce strike days and if they dont like it then tough s**t. Who was it who called the talks to an end? Who was it who said that the "period of calm is over"? Not us them. I dont mind taking the morale high ground but even that has its limits and they have crossed it.
Call some dates lay down the law and if they want to deal thye do it on OUR terms.
time to earn the cash now but lets see what comes out tonight or in the morning
-
madelin4
- Posts: 1220
- Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 16:56
-
leelatic
- Posts: 108
- Joined: 20 May 2007, 20:55
Great post I totally agree!stubaby wrote:I have backed our Union to the hilt and have complete faith and Bob and Dave but i now think we should draw a line in the sand.
They are starting to take the piss out of us and it has to stop.
We should announce strike days and if they dont like it then tough s**t. Who was it who called the talks to an end? Who was it who said that the "period of calm is over"? Not us them. I dont mind taking the morale high ground but even that has its limits and they have crossed it.
Call some dates lay down the law and if they want to deal thye do it on OUR terms.
-
manchesterblue
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 14 Jul 2007, 21:30
Think we should now be posting a series of rolling strike dates, up to and including xmas and beyond. We cannot and should not give in now. This is a deliberate ploy by the two tossers to discredit the union and its members. We should also be going public with the latest, and infoming the public of what is really going on. They deserve better and deserve to know the truth! Why are the union holding back and giving RM the upper hand. Fight dirty, fight hard! :lfo :cfo
-
lovejoy
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59
-
dodger71
- Posts: 39
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 17:36
- Gender: Female
- Location: right here right now
SET THE DATES
come on cwu get the dates set they (crozier and leighton) are taking the piss they dont want to talk just stall and erode morale of the staff and the momentum of the strike action. we all know how pissed off we get when we are kept in the dark...set the dates call there bluff
-
stubaby
- Posts: 220
- Joined: 22 May 2007, 19:19
lovejoy wrote:agreedstubaby wrote:I have backed our Union to the hilt and have complete faith and Bob and Dave but i now think we should draw a line in the sand.
They are starting to take the piss out of us and it has to stop.
We should announce strike days and if they dont like it then tough s**t. Who was it who called the talks to an end? Who was it who said that the "period of calm is over"? Not us them. I dont mind taking the morale high ground but even that has its limits and they have crossed it.
Call some dates lay down the law and if they want to deal thye do it on OUR terms.
time to earn the cash now but lets see what comes out tonight or in the morning
-
billypants
- Posts: 563
- Joined: 25 May 2007, 12:11
- Location: South East
Oooooh . . . . . . the all new, tough talking, no more mr nice guy stubaby . . . . . . . . . I approve and definately agreestubaby wrote:I have backed our Union to the hilt and have complete faith and Bob and Dave but i now think we should draw a line in the sand.
They are starting to take the piss out of us and it has to stop.
We should announce strike days and if they dont like it then tough s**t. Who was it who called the talks to an end? Who was it who said that the "period of calm is over"? Not us them. I dont mind taking the morale high ground but even that has its limits and they have crossed it.
Call some dates lay down the law and if they want to deal thye do it on OUR terms.
Together we stand, divided we fall
-
DirtyHarry
- Posts: 5051
- Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: London
Well, chaps....................
If Royal Mail's "plans" make one iota of difference to the inevitable huge backlog of mail, a backlog that is absolutely certain to appear, I'll undergo
a voluntary lobotomy, and become a SCREW!
a voluntary lobotomy, and become a SCREW!
-
dongash
- Posts: 341
- Joined: 25 May 2007, 14:11
- Location: Macclesfield, Cheshire
-
lovejoy
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59
have i missed something? is the dispute over? lets get real here. these are the sort of things royal mail want to hear! once the agreement is signed sealed and delivered we can attack the actions of our union. for now we must support the PEOPLE WE ELECTED!dongash wrote:we have backed the union 100%, hindsight is a clever thing..... but the members knew not to trust the two clowns who play at running royal mail so why didn't our labour loving union leadership? :cfo :lfo :cfo :lfo :cfo :lfo
-
royalwud
- Posts: 117
- Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 22:36
- Location: Nottingham
-
leader
- Posts: 36
- Joined: 20 May 2007, 12:17
-
madelin4
- Posts: 1220
- Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 16:56
