http://www.campaignlive.co.uk/news/1101 ... -campaign/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
BSkyB has successfully petitioned the Adverting Standards Authority (ASA) to ban a direct mail campaign by rival Virgin Media, because it was not obviously identifiable as marketing communication.
In June Virgin Media sent out jiffy bags bearing the text, "satellite TV upgrade pack".
The pack boasted it contained everything a consumer needed, including free service and repairs.
Vertical small print on the right-hand side of the envelope revealed the package contained "promotional material from Virgin Media".
The ASA decided the disclaimer was likely to be overlooked by consumers because it was considerably smaller than the main text and was located under a series of reference numbers at a 90 degree angle on the right hand side of the envelope.
The ASA concluded the direct mail campaign did not clearly state it was marketing communication sent with commercial intent, meaning it breached the advertising watchdog's code.
An additional complaint about Virgin Media claiming "a better TV experience" was rejected by the ASA despite an objection from Sky, which said the statement could misleadingly imply Virgin Media's picture quality was better than its own.
The advertising watchdog said the campaign must not be repeated and now insists all future Virgin campaigns must clearly state they are marketing communications.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Sky and Virgin clash over unbranded direct mail campaign
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72626
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Sky and Virgin clash over unbranded direct mail campaign
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
POSTMAN
- SITE ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 32737
- Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Sky and Virgin clash over unbranded direct mail campaign
Sky don't have 'small print' then?
Tit for tat?
Tit for tat?
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
-
RedBagMan
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: 01 Aug 2010, 17:53
- Gender: Male
- Location: Behind the lens
Re: Sky and Virgin clash over unbranded direct mail campaign
Do people not have eyes ???
They'll be arguing the toss about PPI next ...
They'll be arguing the toss about PPI next ...
"We're under model" - oh no we're not - stick your lapse elsewhere ...
-
Lounge Lizard
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 9458
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54
Re: Sky and Virgin clash over unbranded direct mail campaign
Berdie rapped again.
He should have stuck to record shops instead of becoming a jack of all trades, master of none. 
-
pinstripe
- Posts: 2469
- Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
- Gender: Male
- Location: 2 left turns from reality
Re: Sky and Virgin clash over unbranded direct mail campaign
Do you mean like 'your' Sky Box belongs to them, but you have to pay to have it repaired?POSTMAN wrote:Sky don't have 'small print' then?
Tit for tat?
-
DGP1
- Posts: 15551
- Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
- Gender: Male
- Location: Terminus
Re: Sky and Virgin clash over unbranded direct mail campaign
The Sky box belongs to you, the card belongs to Sky but without the card the box doesn't workpinstripe wrote:Do you mean like 'your' Sky Box belongs to them, but you have to pay to have it repaired?POSTMAN wrote:Sky don't have 'small print' then?
Tit for tat?
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
-
arnold cheshire
- Posts: 5309
- Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
- Gender: Male
- Location: england
Re: Sky and Virgin clash over unbranded direct mail campaign
your sky box is yourspinstripe wrote:Do you mean like 'your' Sky Box belongs to them, but you have to pay to have it repaired?POSTMAN wrote:Sky don't have 'small print' then?
Tit for tat?