ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Scheduled Attendance being removed

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
wandle
Posts: 944
Joined: 25 Feb 2011, 17:17
Gender: Male

Re: Scheduled Attendance being removed

Post by wandle »

clashcityrocker wrote:
fishtank wrote:As the company sheds 24,000 jobs the idea of S.A becomes more and more unsustainable.
S.A. was always morally questionable...now it's also embarrassingly outdated.
Unless you currently do it in which case the union must protect your earnings. :cuppa

Personally, I think more emphasis should be made on raising basic pay so that people don't need to do overtime or SA.

Shouldn't every trade union in this country be striving towards full employment (and a fair wage) for all those who wish to have a job ? Idealogically, is it not better to have more RM people in full-time jobs, than have some people living on three-quarters of a wage whilst others in the same office earn both Basic Pay AND guaranteed overtime every week ? :hmmmm
Viewfindergeneral
Posts: 267
Joined: 15 Dec 2008, 12:05
Gender: Male

Re: Scheduled Attendance being removed

Post by Viewfindergeneral »

wandle wrote:

Personally, I think more emphasis should be made on raising basic pay so that people don't need to do overtime or SA.

Shouldn't every trade union in this country be striving towards full employment (and a fair wage) for all those who wish to have a job ? Idealogically, is it not better to have more RM people in full-time jobs, than have some people living on three-quarters of a wage whilst others in the same office earn both Basic Pay AND guaranteed overtime every week ? :hmmmm
Well that sums up what happens in my office nicely. And to rub salt into the wound, those lucky enough to be paid "overtime" for supposedly "working" 48 hours a week in fact don't even "work" a total of 40 hours a week.
youwot!!!!!
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 582
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 14:45
Gender: Male
Location: oop north

Re: Scheduled Attendance being removed

Post by youwot!!!!! »

clashcityrocker wrote:
fishtank wrote:As the company sheds 24,000 jobs the idea of S.A becomes more and more unsustainable.
S.A. was always morally questionable...now it's also embarrassingly outdated.
Unless you currently do it in which case the union must protect your earnings. :cuppa

the union is committed to making as many full time jobs as possible and if that means that s/a goes then the union won't fight to hard to protect your earnings.
every one is right about the 4 weeks notice period and this works both ways as you have to gice the 4 weeks notice if you don't want to do the s/a any more.
s/a is only compulsary IF YOU HAVE SIGNED FOR IT.if you have been working the s/a without signing for it and you don't want to do it any more then you do't need to give 4 weeks notice but again it works both ways if you haven't signed for it.
who the hell invests £2 billion into a servic and makes it worse?????????????
you really couldn't make it up!!!!!!!!!!!
Bahia Feliz
Posts: 1169
Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 21:04
Gender: Male

Re: Scheduled Attendance being removed

Post by Bahia Feliz »

clashcityrocker wrote:Thanks for that really informative description of Scheduled Attendance.
The point I was making (perhaps a little too facetiously I grant you) is that in a time when we are struggling to maintain full time jobs, overtime in any shape or form is impossible to defend.
One full timers scheduled attendance is keeping a colleague on a part time contract.
We currently have approx 40 hours of SA in our office. That is a full time job of work.
Would you defend those people's "right " to o/t or would you rather see that work redistributed so 4 p/t staff could be made f/t or 2 people could be taken off the dole and give a p/t contract?
An office may have 10 lots of 4 hour s/a's doing collections i.e 15.00 to 19.00 so how can they cancel them and convert it to one full time job clashcityrocker you dimwit!
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Scheduled Attendance being removed

Post by fishtank »

The Dinton Hermit wrote: An office may have 10 lots of 4 hour s/a's doing collections i.e 15.00 to 19.00 so how can they cancel them and convert it to one full time job clashcityrocker you dimwit!
Never heard of hybrids in your part of the world?
It's an especially good way to maintain full-time work when indoor work is allegedly falling...like now.
Dimwits... :left:
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
baldrick
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 5038
Joined: 13 Sep 2007, 23:37
Gender: Male

Re: Scheduled Attendance being removed

Post by baldrick »

youwot!!!!! wrote: every one is right about the 4 weeks notice period and this works both ways as you have to gice the 4 weeks notice if you don't want to do the s/a any more.
s/a is only compulsary IF YOU HAVE SIGNED FOR IT.if you have been working the s/a without signing for it and you don't want to do it any more then you do't need to give 4 weeks notice but again it works both ways if you haven't signed for it.
Well that's right in theory - but in practice how can RM make you do SA even if you originally signed a SA contract, if you no longer want to?
I didn't give any notice when I stopped doing SA. I just stopped doing it. There isn't anything RM can do, is there? Except perhaps banning you from doing SA or OT, but if you don't want to do it, that won't matter.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16688
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Scheduled Attendance being removed

Post by clashcityrocker »

fishtank wrote:
The Dinton Hermit wrote: An office may have 10 lots of 4 hour s/a's doing collections i.e 15.00 to 19.00 so how can they cancel them and convert it to one full time job clashcityrocker you dimwit!
Never heard of hybrids in your part of the world?
It's an especially good way to maintain full-time work when indoor work is allegedly falling...like now.
Dimwits... :left:
His part of the world.....Aylesbury. :cuppa Probably grammar school educated.
Postman are you really going to allow that level of vindictive name calling to go unchallenged?
What sort of site are you now running?
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72725
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Scheduled Attendance being removed

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

The Dinton Hermit wrote:
clashcityrocker wrote:Thanks for that really informative description of Scheduled Attendance.
The point I was making (perhaps a little too facetiously I grant you) is that in a time when we are struggling to maintain full time jobs, overtime in any shape or form is impossible to defend.
One full timers scheduled attendance is keeping a colleague on a part time contract.
We currently have approx 40 hours of SA in our office. That is a full time job of work.
Would you defend those people's "right " to o/t or would you rather see that work redistributed so 4 p/t staff could be made f/t or 2 people could be taken off the dole and give a p/t contract?
An office may have 10 lots of 4 hour s/a's doing collections i.e 15.00 to 19.00 so how can they cancel them and convert it to one full time job clashcityrocker you dimwit!

4 hour days - in other words 20 hour weekly contracts - have we never heard of that in deliveries :hmmmm :hmmmm and a lot cheaper as well.....

I won't call you a dimwit though.....
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Lounge Lizard
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 9458
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54

Re: Scheduled Attendance being removed

Post by Lounge Lizard »

wandle wrote:
clashcityrocker wrote:
fishtank wrote:As the company sheds 24,000 jobs the idea of S.A becomes more and more unsustainable.
S.A. was always morally questionable...now it's also embarrassingly outdated.
Unless you currently do it in which case the union must protect your earnings. :cuppa

Personally, I think more emphasis should be made on raising basic pay so that people don't need to do overtime or SA.

Shouldn't every trade union in this country be striving towards full employment (and a fair wage) for all those who wish to have a job ? Idealogically, is it not better to have more RM people in full-time jobs, than have some people living on three-quarters of a wage whilst others in the same office earn both Basic Pay AND guaranteed overtime every week ? :hmmmm
"Personally, I think more emphasis should be made on raising basic pay" - maybe, but at £9.51 per hour, including 'Delivery Supplement', for what is basically an unskilled job I don't think the CWU, especially with the leadership it has, has much chance of getting us much of a rise. :sad:
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Scheduled Attendance being removed

Post by DGP1 »

Lounge Lizard wrote: "Personally, I think more emphasis should be made on raising basic pay" - maybe, but at £9.51 per hour, including 'Delivery Supplement', for what is basically an unskilled job I don't think the CWU, especially with the leadership it has, has much chance of getting us much of a rise. :sad:
Speak for yourself about unskilled, I have great skill in annoying the boss, dodging dogs/cats/various farmyard livestock, cutting off and generally being a pain in the arse :Very Happy
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
youwot!!!!!
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 582
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 14:45
Gender: Male
Location: oop north

Re: Scheduled Attendance being removed

Post by youwot!!!!! »

baldrick wrote:
youwot!!!!! wrote: every one is right about the 4 weeks notice period and this works both ways as you have to gice the 4 weeks notice if you don't want to do the s/a any more.
s/a is only compulsary IF YOU HAVE SIGNED FOR IT.if you have been working the s/a without signing for it and you don't want to do it any more then you do't need to give 4 weeks notice but again it works both ways if you haven't signed for it.
Well that's right in theory - but in practice how can RM make you do SA even if you originally signed a SA contract, if you no longer want to?
I didn't give any notice when I stopped doing SA. I just stopped doing it. There isn't anything RM can do, is there? Except perhaps banning you from doing SA or OT, but if you don't want to do it, that won't matter.
your spot on there mate.if you don't want o/t or s/a AT ALL then there is sod all they can do except B&H. :Very Happy
who the hell invests £2 billion into a servic and makes it worse?????????????
you really couldn't make it up!!!!!!!!!!!