ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Banning Smoke Breaks

A forum for our Mail Centre, Processing and Distribution colleagues.
gerardy
Posts: 315
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 12:14
Gender: Male

Re: Banning Smoke Breaks

Post by gerardy »

all of these withdrawal of breaks, even the grace breaks are just amunition for RM to try and achieve 100BSI.
if all breaks are removed easier to manipulate figures for the unrealistic IWT
paving the wayback for bullying and harassment
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Banning Smoke Breaks

Post by fishtank »

gerardy wrote:all of these withdrawal of breaks, even the grace breaks are just amunition for RM to try and achieve 100BSI.
if all breaks are removed easier to manipulate figures for the unrealistic IWT
paving the wayback for bullying and harassment
Very true.
It's a very dangerous game moving into the area of actually banning particular activities.
Should we ban eating and drinking outside of designated meal breaks?
Should we ban the use of mobile phones entirely?
Should we ban talking?
Should we ban toilet breaks outside of designated meal breaks? or like some companies already do...actually allocate a specific amount of time for toilet breaks?...i think Sky give you 3mins.
Should this not be a management thread. :cuppa
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
Stampy
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 285
Joined: 09 Mar 2010, 15:00
Gender: Male

Re: Banning Smoke Breaks

Post by Stampy »

Speaking of Mobile Phones...

Seems amazing after having workmen in over the past few weekends - hardly ANYBODY in our MC can get a signal on their phone IN work, step outside in the car park - Signal comes back...

Methinks they've done something to stop the signal....... :roll:
And after a while, you can work on points for style,
Like the club tie, and the firm handshake,
A certain look in the eye and an easy smile.

You have to be trusted by the people that you lie to,
So that when they turn their backs on you,
You'll get the chance to put the knife in.
noggin1969
Posts: 1321
Joined: 13 Oct 2009, 17:28
Gender: Male

Re: Banning Smoke Breaks

Post by noggin1969 »

Seems amazing after having workmen in over the past few weekends - hardly ANYBODY in our MC can get a signal on their phone IN work, step outside in the car park - Signal comes back...
Last edited by noggin1969 on 06 Feb 2024, 17:35, edited 1 time in total.
Judgee
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 2260
Joined: 23 Oct 2007, 15:18

Re: Banning Smoke Breaks

Post by Judgee »

The non-smokers go out for a break with the smokers in my office... so what's the problem? :d'oh!
Union what Union? Do we have a union?
Throbnob
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 8
Joined: 22 Oct 2009, 14:59
Gender: Male

Re: Banning Smoke Breaks

Post by Throbnob »

Judgee wrote:The non-smokers go out for a break with the smokers in my office... so what's the problem? :d'oh!
A few years ago I had a line manager who invited the non-smokers in her section to disappear for the odd few minutes when they felt like it, as did smokers. "Just don't take the piss" she said. Spot on, and she remains the only manager I've known who confronted the problem head-on. 95% of posties (right figure? Discuss) can be trusted on this. It's the scrag end of 5% that are the problem.

I know and work with several smokers; they take breaks, but as they are serious grafters I have no problem. If they quit smoking, didn't take these breaks, and only met the "performance standard", they'd do less work. So let them have a fag now and then.

Then we have the piss-takers. We have one guy on lates here who spends *at least* an hour each shift sat in his car smoking. Work it out:

- shift is 8 hours; allowing for official breaks, 7 hours
- so 1 hour smoking is 1/7th of his working day
- working year is 52 weeks less 6 (holiday) less 2 (sick: they're all the same) so 44 weeks
- 1/7th of this is a bit more than 6 weeks

SIX WEEKS

This guy is effectively getting six weeks paid leave more than the rest of us. It's wrong.

Isn't it?
hubbahubba
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1045
Joined: 24 Jun 2009, 22:02
Gender: Female

Re: Banning Smoke Breaks

Post by hubbahubba »

Throbnob wrote:
Judgee wrote:The non-smokers go out for a break with the smokers in my office... so what's the problem? :d'oh!
A few years ago I had a line manager who invited the non-smokers in her section to disappear for the odd few minutes when they felt like it, as did smokers. "Just don't take the piss" she said. Spot on, and she remains the only manager I've known who confronted the problem head-on. 95% of posties (right figure? Discuss) can be trusted on this. It's the scrag end of 5% that are the problem.

I know and work with several smokers; they take breaks, but as they are serious grafters I have no problem. If they quit smoking, didn't take these breaks, and only met the "performance standard", they'd do less work. So let them have a fag now and then.

Then we have the piss-takers. We have one guy on lates here who spends *at least* an hour each shift sat in his car smoking. Work it out:

- shift is 8 hours; allowing for official breaks, 7 hours
- so 1 hour smoking is 1/7th of his working day
- working year is 52 weeks less 6 (holiday) less 2 (sick: they're all the same) so 44 weeks
- 1/7th of this is a bit more than 6 weeks

SIX WEEKS

This guy is effectively getting six weeks paid leave more than the rest of us. It's wrong.

Isn't it?
yes :cuppa
same as it ever was...
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Banning Smoke Breaks

Post by fishtank »

That's playground logic
You could apply that to anyone who isn't 100% "head down" getting on with their work for 100% of the day.
Can anyone hold their hand up and say they do that?
Is this a direction we want to go?
I thought we hated all that 100BSI s**t?
I'm not condoning piss-takers,smokers or otherwise but be careful what you wish for. :cuppa
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72597
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Banning Smoke Breaks

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

I have to say that even though I have contributed to this thread I still think this is a side issue and not really worth getting upset or angry about. Ok some do take the piss when going for a fag break, comfort break or just to refill their coffee/tea or talk to their mate. But there are many more important issues, daily, in every Delivery Office, Mail Centre and other Units that are not being addressed.

I think we have to repair the foundations of this job, business, union before we worry about what others are doing. If we did then Managers could really manage, instead of slavishly following instructions and watching their backs as they do now, and niggly little things like this would be dealt with swiftly and fairly.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Banning Smoke Breaks

Post by dvbuk55 »

DGP1 wrote:
bringon4dayweeks wrote:what about the ones that adore a female member of staff?
:hmmmm I adore all female members of staff............of course that's usually in my head while I'm prepping so that's ok then :wink:
I didn't know that females had members..............now you do learn something every day :shock:
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Banning Smoke Breaks

Post by DGP1 »

dvbuk55 wrote:
DGP1 wrote:
bringon4dayweeks wrote:what about the ones that adore a female member of staff?
:hmmmm I adore all female members of staff............of course that's usually in my head while I'm prepping so that's ok then :wink:
I didn't know that females had members..............now you do learn something every day :shock:
They do in the videos I watch :nervous
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
wandle
Posts: 944
Joined: 25 Feb 2011, 17:17
Gender: Male

Re: Banning Smoke Breaks

Post by wandle »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:I have to say that even though I have contributed to this thread I still think this is a side issue and not really worth getting upset or angry about. Ok some do take the piss when going for a fag break, comfort break or just to refill their coffee/tea or talk to their mate. But there are many more important issues, daily, in every Delivery Office, Mail Centre and other Units that are not being addressed.

I think we have to repair the foundations of this job, business, union before we worry about what others are doing. If we did then Managers could really manage :left:
You made me choke on my beer TBT. Most of the managers I've ever known can't even find a brewery, never mind manage a p!ss-up in one :whistle
Swinder
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 82
Joined: 12 May 2010, 17:25
Gender: Male

Re: Banning Smoke Breaks

Post by Swinder »

Wolves mail centre is heaven for smokers. On the late shift there are more managers in the smoking sheds than there are workers.

Used to smoke myself and occasionally took the piss with cigarette breaks. Since I have quit smoking I no longer have any small breaks, not even to grab a drink.
I have no issue with cigarette breaks as I understand the dependency people suffer from, what I do have an issue with is someone that can not go out on there own and must be accompanied by someone else and those whom appear to have scheduled in fixed times which conveniently coincide with certain tasks which need to be completed by certain times.