ARMANI!!

pistol · Post by **pistol** » 21 Aug 2007, 23:32

Who thinks this bloke is just a Pr*t on a wind up?? (someone had to do it

)

L Tommo · Post by **L Tommo** » 21 Aug 2007, 23:33

Pistol mate... Wheres the choice of COMPLEAT AND UTTER BASTARD????

pistol · Post by **pistol** » 21 Aug 2007, 23:38

Can't add that as it won't let me..and postman would have a word i'm sure..however your'e opinion is well met mukka..

L Tommo · Post by **L Tommo** » 21 Aug 2007, 23:46

Ok pistol geez... Just put OTHER... AND i think everybody will know what that is ment for!!!

bigsharkboy · Post by **bigsharkboy** » 22 Aug 2007, 22:51

hey give the guy a break eh

nah hes a management toady feck off back to hellmail and grow yer self a backbone yah spineless litttle shite

armani · Post by **armani** » 22 Aug 2007, 22:51

It only winds you up because you are sooo union orientated.

If you stood back, didn't get involved with things that didn't involve you (on a work/business level) and done the job asked of you (more pointed to POL NOT RM) then there wouldn't be such harsh comments made.

All i would have received to my questions were answers relating to the questions.

But so many folk get caught up in all the action and take a side that whenever someone mentions anything against the grain they are branded some obscenity.

But as has been said we all have opinions and usually they are biased towards one corner or the other.

I'd imagine I'd get the same response if this had been a forum used by people that enjoyed working for the company and I'd asked why don't you guys go out on strike

bigsharkboy · Post by **bigsharkboy** » 22 Aug 2007, 22:53

armani wrote:
I'd imagine I'd get the same response if this had been a forum used by people that enjoyed working for the company and I'd asked why don't you guys go out on strike

well feck off to hellmail and ask ya questions there

IWW Fellow Worker · Post by **IWW Fellow Worker** » 22 Aug 2007, 23:16

armani wrote:you are sooo union orientated.

That's most likely because during my time working for Royal Mail, the union (i.e the membership) have got us from a 44 to a 40 hour week, a six to a five day week, boot issue instead of having to buy our own, from a thirty to a forty minute meal relief, real progress in H&S and increases in annual leave. There is much more which could have been done and as far as unions go, I'm more inclined towards the IWW than the CWU, but don't lose sight of the fact that any union is the membership and acting together has brought us benefits which soft arses like you and your management friends would never have given us.

pistol · Post by **pistol** » 22 Aug 2007, 23:52

armani wrote:It only winds you up because you are sooo union orientated.

If you stood back, didn't get involved with things that didn't involve you (on a work/business level) and done the job asked of you (more pointed to POL NOT RM) then there wouldn't be such harsh comments made.

All i would have received to my questions were answers relating to the questions.

But so many folk get caught up in all the action and take a side that whenever someone mentions anything against the grain they are branded some obscenity.

But as has been said we all have opinions and usually they are biased towards one corner or the other.

I'd imagine I'd get the same response if this had been a forum used by people that enjoyed working for the company and I'd asked why don't you guys go out on strike

10 out of 10 so far...popular bloke aint ya!!!

Post by **dvbuk55** » 23 Aug 2007, 13:11

IWW Fellow Worker wrote:
armani wrote:you are sooo union orientated.
That's most likely because during my time working for Royal Mail, the union (i.e the membership) have got us from a 44 to a 40 hour week, a six to a five day week, boot issue instead of having to buy our own, from a thirty to a forty minute meal relief, real progress in H&S and increases in annual leave. There is much more which could have been done and as far as unions go, I'm more inclined towards the IWW than the CWU, but don't lose sight of the fact that any union is the membership and acting together has brought us benefits which soft arses like you and your management friends would never have given us.

In the 70s a colleague of mine once summed up the strength of collective bargaining when he said "When they had it (meaning the owners or managers) they wouldn't give it to us because we weren't organised - now we're organsied they haven't got it but we certainly are going to make them pay now". As you have pointed out it isn't always about direct money payment but in improved conditions - a shorter working week with the same pay is an improvement, more holidays with pay is an improvement - one of the cries by my then union was "retiring earlier with digniity" - that never came about and by the look of things it is going to take a strong will to maintain the pension fund at its current level.

Post by **POSTMAN** » 23 Aug 2007, 13:45

Despite it's faults at times as we all know,i could NOT imagine being in this job if there was no Union.
I'm not a mass militant and i dont eat and sleep them,but i thank f**k for them

axeman · Post by **axeman** » 23 Aug 2007, 14:38

just imagine if we had no union

the likes of :lfo :cfo would have a field day. just imagine gordys response to us would be like 'f**k off pesants go screw yourselves pay rise what again you had one 5 yrs ago !!!!!' but it's not far off that at the mo anyway

L Tommo · Post by **L Tommo** » 23 Aug 2007, 17:53

armani wrote:It only winds you up because you are sooo union orientated.

If you stood back, didn't get involved with things that didn't involve you (on a work/business level) and done the job asked of you (more pointed to POL NOT RM) then there wouldn't be such harsh comments made.

All i would have received to my questions were answers relating to the questions.

But so many folk get caught up in all the action and take a side that whenever someone mentions anything against the grain they are branded some obscenity.

But as has been said we all have opinions and usually they are biased towards one corner or the other.

I'd imagine I'd get the same response if this had been a forum used by people that enjoyed working for the company and I'd asked why don't you guys go out on strike

LOOK.... uve had your 15 mins of fame and limelight.. Uve got a place on this site. Made a few FRIENDS

NOW go and play in your side of the playground or it might seem as bullying if i start giving you all i feel about things like you.. But this is just your game plan me thinks... Antagonise. whined up and watch people make statements of anger just to make a small sad point for yourself and then can go running back to who ever you can telling of the bad wicked militant people on here that only want blood and to bring down the state... rumourmongaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!! thats all you are and a not very good one at that...

night night sonny!!

DirtyHarry · Post by **DirtyHarry** » 30 Aug 2007, 21:17

POSTMAN wrote:Despite it's faults at times as we all know,i could NOT imagine being in this job if there was no Union.
I'm not a mass militant and i dont eat and sleep them,but i thank f**k for them

Same here, mate.

DirtyHarry · Post by **DirtyHarry** » 30 Aug 2007, 21:23

pistol wrote:Who thinks this bloke is just a Pr*t on a wind up?? (someone had to do it )

He's also a prize prawn.

ROYALMAILCHAT

ARMANI!!

Prize pr*t or stand up guy??

ARMANI!!

Re: ARMANI!!