IloveMYredTROLLEY! wrote:I could understand posties zig-zagging on a rural route, but for most of us, surely it is far more efficient (and safer, in theory) to deliver along one side of the road before doing the other side?
A few weeks back I did a bit of o/t on a new round, which had a bonkers sequence, according to the frame layout... Delivering in blocks of ~20 before doubling back after crossing over the road, all the pointless "dead walking" drove me scatty, when the whole complex could have been done in one loop! Almost as good as frame layouts for blocks of flats that would have you walking randomly between different levels instead of the simple numerical order in which they are situated. I sware some layouts must be in operation from the drug-indused days from the 60s...
If you ever see a road on a frame that has the numbers going from say low odd to high odd then low evens to high evens then this needs to be backed - backed means you have to zig zag.
I do about 1/4 of my delivery by backing (zig zagging) a road. The reason is to cut out dead walking like ILMRT had to do above, and because its quicker and less tiring.
I think where backing helps is if you deliver on steep hills, or when if you did one side then the other, you have to spend more than 3 or 4 minutes walking back to the start. Of course it wont work on very busy roads and therefore any dead walking should be factored in to the delivery span plan.