Which according to your DOM would be what??whippet wrote:I was given a full explanation of what I should've done
deliver everything you take out??
You seem happy with the outcome whippet, well done for standing up for yourself.
Which according to your DOM would be what??whippet wrote:I was given a full explanation of what I should've done
belle smith wrote:Which according to your DOM would be what??whippet wrote:I was given a full explanation of what I should've done
deliver everything you take out??
You seem happy with the outcome whippet, well done for standing up for yourself.
I had a DOM that told me that leaflet was out of date, funny thing is when i e-mailed askadam@royalmail they said all the information on the leafet was still valid!whippet wrote:also the DOM said that the leaflet I printed out from the link you gave me is about 5 or 6 yrs old, but that doesn't matter now.
When any manager tells you something like this ask to see the procedure/agreement that supercedes it.whippet wrote:also the DOM said that the leaflet I printed out from the link you gave me is about 5 or 6 yrs old,
I had seen a simular statement 'there is a clear expectation that all mail taken out will be deliverd' and thought it was from my temp contract but was mistaken.belle smith wrote: Evidence for that George?
I know thats what managers say....but they would wouldn't they.
The only documentation that i have seen that comes close to that is related to the SDD agreement, their is an agreement for managing O/T and cutting off which says in it that "there is a clear expectation that all mail taken out will be deliverd."
As far as i'm now concerned the can expect all they want.
They do try bless them.fishtank wrote:When any manager tells you something like this ask to see the procedure/agreement that supercedes it.whippet wrote:also the DOM said that the leaflet I printed out from the link you gave me is about 5 or 6 yrs old,
Just because a document has been around for a while doesn't mean it doesn't still stand.
The Way Forward Agreement is 11 years old and still holds the field for many of the working practices that are around today.
No appoligies necassery.George door to dawes wrote:I had seen a simular statement 'there is a clear expectation that all mail taken out will be deliverd' and thought it was from my temp contract but was mistaken.belle smith wrote: Evidence for that George?
I know thats what managers say....but they would wouldn't they.
The only documentation that i have seen that comes close to that is related to the SDD agreement, their is an agreement for managing O/T and cutting off which says in it that "there is a clear expectation that all mail taken out will be deliverd."
As far as i'm now concerned the can expect all they want.Sorry!
Admiting your mistakes and apologising is what makes us different from the RM management!belle smith wrote:No appoligies necassery.George door to dawes wrote:I had seen a simular statement 'there is a clear expectation that all mail taken out will be deliverd' and thought it was from my temp contract but was mistaken.belle smith wrote: Evidence for that George?
I know thats what managers say....but they would wouldn't they.
The only documentation that i have seen that comes close to that is related to the SDD agreement, their is an agreement for managing O/T and cutting off which says in it that "there is a clear expectation that all mail taken out will be deliverd."
As far as i'm now concerned the can expect all they want.Sorry!
George door to dawes wrote:Admiting your mistakes and apologising is what makes us different from the RM management!