ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
MESSAGES FOR DAVE WARD PT2 NOW YOU'VE SLEPT ON IT!
-
bigdanny
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 21 Feb 2007, 16:47
i think we should have carried on. these bastards have now got the upper hand. as far as i'm concerned leighton and crozier are gonna do what they want now. managers attitudes aint changed where i am in fact they are worse. giving it the billy big bollocks thinking theyve won. smacks of dodgy dealing to me. where was bob gibson in these meetings? why the confidentiality cause? stitched again methinks.
postie brentwood
-
rhino49
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 21:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: At home with my feet up
Second impression............
I was, as I posted yesterday, lost for words when I heard of the suspension of IA. Now that I’ve had time to look round I’ve found a few.
We are only suspending the IA and if my fingers and toes haven’t lied to me, the date by which we are promised a resolution to the dispute will arrive in time for the CWU to notify of further action if required without having to re-ballot the members.
Allan Leighton and Adam Crozier have had a taste of trying to outmanoeuvre a determined workforce with a determined union behind them and despite their claims of support and progress during the IA have had to admit (at least to themselves) that Royal Mail underestimated the commitment of it’s employees and their belief in their company as a public service.
This dispute was never “just about the moneyâ€
We are only suspending the IA and if my fingers and toes haven’t lied to me, the date by which we are promised a resolution to the dispute will arrive in time for the CWU to notify of further action if required without having to re-ballot the members.
Allan Leighton and Adam Crozier have had a taste of trying to outmanoeuvre a determined workforce with a determined union behind them and despite their claims of support and progress during the IA have had to admit (at least to themselves) that Royal Mail underestimated the commitment of it’s employees and their belief in their company as a public service.
This dispute was never “just about the moneyâ€
Last edited by rhino49 on 10 Aug 2007, 21:19, edited 1 time in total.
We wish to serve - but we will not be servile
-
fingers
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 10 Aug 2007, 19:20
dave ward
i think after we striked we deserve better than what we have,royal mail has gave us nothing and we have gave them everything . now because of this two week with out stiike action all them mail will be cleared up and we will be back to square one .
dave ward should have striked when harry potter books came out , this stike action is too soft get tough or get out
royal mail must be laughting at us
dave ward should have striked when harry potter books came out , this stike action is too soft get tough or get out
royal mail must be laughting at us
-
mailman71
- Posts: 500
- Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 08:03
i dont think royal mail will be laughing at us far from it, the 1 day all out strikes maybe did'nt hit them hard but the rolling action did only 2 weeks of that and big bad al came to the meeting for the first time.
as regards the early starts the union will need all their diplomatic skill on that one but lets see what they come up with
as regards the early starts the union will need all their diplomatic skill on that one but lets see what they come up with
-
BB brother
- Posts: 193
- Joined: 19 May 2007, 01:41
Cant see how d ward could have done a better job so far !
This was a ministerial backed attempt to give the union a kick in the b#llocks and take it out of the equation as far as the future was concerned.
They thought the membership would fold after a couple of one dayers. then, with a consderably weakened union in thier pockets, full speed ahead with a buisness plan that suits no one except the treasury.
The PEC have so far played a canny game,lets hope they close the deal!
.
This was a ministerial backed attempt to give the union a kick in the b#llocks and take it out of the equation as far as the future was concerned.
They thought the membership would fold after a couple of one dayers. then, with a consderably weakened union in thier pockets, full speed ahead with a buisness plan that suits no one except the treasury.
The PEC have so far played a canny game,lets hope they close the deal!
.
-
Loyalblue
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 34
- Joined: 08 Aug 2007, 07:45
- Location: South East
-
BB brother
- Posts: 193
- Joined: 19 May 2007, 01:41
Would anyone who sees this as a bad move rather we had a situation where senior management still refused to even come to the table !
Youve got to look at the long game chaps !
We,ve got their attention now, no need to squeeze any harder yet.
Youve got to look at the long game chaps !
We,ve got their attention now, no need to squeeze any harder yet.
Last edited by BB brother on 10 Aug 2007, 21:27, edited 1 time in total.
-
Big Daz
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
- Gender: Male
-
rhino49
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 21:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: At home with my feet up
Absolutely - let's hope this situation has made all the people who "leave it to someone else" realise that they can have a say by using their vote and can never justify a complaint if they couldn't be bothered to use it. Every aspect of our democratic system has to be understood if it is to be used to effect change. Learn about the issues, the candidates and the options if you are to use a vote to make things happen. Every one of us has at times felt alone but we never were - we had thousands of other people out there who voted the same way - Big Daz said "it's important that we get a vote". When we do, just remember how important it is that you use it.Big Daz wrote:One very important thing is that we get a vote on whatver aggrement they come up with and if so lets hope the outcome of the vote has a convincing majority!
No more just over 1/3rd of the members vote yes, just under a 3rd of the members vote no and a third dont bother to vote at all!
We wish to serve - but we will not be servile
-
BB brother
- Posts: 193
- Joined: 19 May 2007, 01:41
Re: dave ward
fingers wrote:i think after we striked we deserve better than what we have,royal mail has gave us nothing and we have gave them everything . now because of this two week with out stiike action all them mail will be cleared up and we will be back to square one .
dave ward should have striked when harry potter books came out , this stike action is too soft get tough or get out
royal mail must be laughting at us
Im sorry but i cant take any more of this garbage !
Can you imagine what headlines the sun would spew up if we did something like this, wed be worse than the childcatcher !!
Do me a favour fingers mate, never become a Rep !!
-
jacee
- Posts: 70
- Joined: 26 Jul 2007, 14:58
Re: dave ward
They would certainly be laughing at your spelling.fingers wrote:i think after we striked we deserve better than what we have,royal mail has gave us nothing and we have gave them everything . now because of this two week with out stiike action all them mail will be cleared up and we will be back to square one .
dave ward should have striked when harry potter books came out , this stike action is too soft get tough or get out
royal mail must be laughting at us
-
F0zziebear
- MYSTERY MAN
- Posts: 637
- Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 23:45
re: The end game
The end game is probably a workforce of about 100,000
A revised USO so meet this
Standardised hours, with a more sntadardised pay structure
Outsource almost all of the support services - payroll, people processes
Retain a small (500) HQ staff
Let areas run an almost autonomous profit and loss account
Approx. 40,000 more redundancies over approx. 3-5 yrs max.
2 competitor E2E delivery companies covering most of the urban and peri-urban areas.
How to prevent this happening:
Competitors decide that investing at least £100M with at least a 5 yr wait before returning profits is not attractive enough, and investing in the Far East/India will provide better returns, therefore creating an almost 100% RM delivery of mail in the UK
The government changing it's liberalisation of the postal market and it's view of what is core public service
New senior mgmt who have a different view
Changing pricing structures to allow RM to increase prices by anything upto 60% (bring inline with European players)
These are slightly drunken views from slightly afar, though the privatisation of BT is a good sign of where things are going.
Wish you all luck in the future
F0zz
A revised USO so meet this
Standardised hours, with a more sntadardised pay structure
Outsource almost all of the support services - payroll, people processes
Retain a small (500) HQ staff
Let areas run an almost autonomous profit and loss account
Approx. 40,000 more redundancies over approx. 3-5 yrs max.
2 competitor E2E delivery companies covering most of the urban and peri-urban areas.
How to prevent this happening:
Competitors decide that investing at least £100M with at least a 5 yr wait before returning profits is not attractive enough, and investing in the Far East/India will provide better returns, therefore creating an almost 100% RM delivery of mail in the UK
The government changing it's liberalisation of the postal market and it's view of what is core public service
New senior mgmt who have a different view
Changing pricing structures to allow RM to increase prices by anything upto 60% (bring inline with European players)
These are slightly drunken views from slightly afar, though the privatisation of BT is a good sign of where things are going.
Wish you all luck in the future
F0zz
-
evilc
- MDEC
- Posts: 721
- Joined: 05 May 2007, 17:20
- Location: near the moors
-
moon71
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 284
- Joined: 07 Aug 2007, 21:47
Ok fella's, apparently the I/A's off. Not im my union, im a member of the provisional CWU an the fight never stops, i'm baiting strike breakers an screws daily, tying them up in conduct codes, plying on the pressure, refusing to work next to strike breakers (they stink an should be hosed down hourly in the yard), being difficult, argueing constantly an as a result the sick levels rocketing. It's great. Maybe if you look over your shoulder to the strike breakers that said this'll never work, you'll be as angry as me. F*k 'em, f*k 'em all, Never forgive neverforget.
The fellas were all sittin for breakfast friday an sid scab sat down, "hello lads, im happy its all over now, lets be friends" "f*k off you prick" was my response, "whilst your scabbing whos with your wife".
The fellas were all sittin for breakfast friday an sid scab sat down, "hello lads, im happy its all over now, lets be friends" "f*k off you prick" was my response, "whilst your scabbing whos with your wife".
-
baldrick
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 5038
- Joined: 13 Sep 2007, 23:37
- Gender: Male
Agree with you there. The strike breakers have put themselves out on a limb for the price of 4 days pay.
Wonder if they think it was worth it to become pariahs, now.
They will no doubt be happy to take any improvements that might come out of an agreement.
Treat them with the contempt they deserve. Hope they leave and go to a non-unionised workplace
and see how they are treated there.
Wonder if they think it was worth it to become pariahs, now.
They will no doubt be happy to take any improvements that might come out of an agreement.
Treat them with the contempt they deserve. Hope they leave and go to a non-unionised workplace
and see how they are treated there.