It doesn’t matter if he is the real Mr Barker or not, since he doesn’t say anything useful, which may indicate that it is indeed he!
My point is that this is a public forum and offensive language does not show us in a good light, no matter who it is directed at.
There are many arguments in our favour, amongst them:
1. Who says we should make a profit, and what about the social need of the service we offer? Is the National Health Service profitable?
2. If you accept that Crown Offices should be run on purely commercial lines, then how is ‘Income’ attributed, and is it done so appropriately – the obvious example being the difference in Travel Money Margins, and the ‘Income’ attributed to the Branch. There are other questionable items in this regard.
3. Further, if we are not to be credited fully for our ‘Social Role’ then why do we continue servicing the needs of the ‘Financially Less Sophisticated’, and less able in society?
4. Why should we pay the price for mismanagement? We all see daily huge waste, caused by poor direction.
5. Ms Vennells cites wide disparity in Throughputs across Crown Offices, and implies this is our problem, when clearly Senior Management has failed to keep this under control.
I’m sure there are others who can think of much more, and that, I suggest, is where we should be focusing our efforts.