we had lots of options mgmnt dont want to accomodate them they dont know how to i kid you not they havn,t a cluePOSTMAN wrote:You should have a number of options to vote on if you are going through a revision.This would be down to you lot getting your heads together.guvenor wrote:were not entitled to more sats off it was a con. pt in our office voted against sats to suit own needs they all think their being made ftdingo wrote:It will depend when your second wave of sequence mail arrives and is up for negotiation. In additon the agreement states that the vast majoirity will be finished by 2:30 , most by 2 . Royal Mail during the talks with the union stated that 92% of staff will be finished before 1430.
Plus you are entitiled to the new attendance patterns which will give you less Saturdays.![]()
they also split the ft vote down the middle with long or short deliveries and are going to put this in regardless
we have to remain on 1 in 6 sats off with longer deliveries on later starts in cdvs with said ptrs
well done cwu and acas you have done ayrshire proud round of applause.
so you can quote all you want dingo, give me the ammo to fight this
Then those options get voted on by the CWU members in your office.
RM don't tell you what you are having,the figures and you lot working your bollox off with them do.
they only see longer deliveries end off
oh, and they don,t want to upset ptrs
we asked for all options to be presented to us mgmnt offered us 3 options of which 2 options would have been no benefit to ft working and the option preferred lost ft jobs
i thought methods were to be put in place regardless of how many jobs hrs etc it had to be workable to the individual
mail now failing daily trays being left at frames once again
before we move to revision which will be total chaos with no support from disilussioned and overworked posties