What is a non walk sequencing revision? I thought it was delivery methods, we've had both walk sequencing an cdvans, originally we were told that meant we got all 3 bonuses now everyone (RM managers, union officials) are getting evasive, and we've only got the 600 so far. Tafishtank wrote:Lump Sums
The payment of £1,000 (pro rata for part time employees) consisting of 3 lump sums will be paid as follows.
£200 will be paid to everyone in the delivery unit on deployment of their first non walk sequencing revision.
£600 will be paid to everyone in the delivery unit on deployment of the walk sequencing revision.
£200 will be paid to everyone in the delivery unit when the Walk Sequencing revision has been implemented, and objectives achieved in line with the local agreement and no later than the end of the 6 week bedding in period.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
LTB 699/10 - Lump Sum Trigger Points
-
goinpostal
- Posts: 395
- Joined: 05 Jun 2007, 00:09
- Gender: Female
Re: LTB 699/10 - Lump Sum Trigger Points
Join Labour, defend Corbyn from the Right, and fight for socialist policies
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 699/10 - Lump Sum Trigger Points
I seems that this agreement is a journeygoinpostal wrote:
What is a non walk sequencing revision? I thought it was delivery methods, we've had both walk sequencing an cdvans, originally we were told that meant we got all 3 bonuses now everyone (RM managers, union officials) are getting evasive, and we've only got the 600 so far. Ta
That is when you will get the final £200 for a non-sequenced revision....probably...maybe...not.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
goinpostal
- Posts: 395
- Joined: 05 Jun 2007, 00:09
- Gender: Female
Re: LTB 699/10 - Lump Sum Trigger Points
But cd vans etc isn't the same as walk sequencing, that is the other revision.
Why else would an agreement put the "second" revision before the first walk seqencing one?
Seems to me what my manager is saying is unfortunately right - that the union has agreed an interpretation of this without telling us. Unless there was an ltb i missed?
Why else would an agreement put the "second" revision before the first walk seqencing one?
Seems to me what my manager is saying is unfortunately right - that the union has agreed an interpretation of this without telling us. Unless there was an ltb i missed?
Join Labour, defend Corbyn from the Right, and fight for socialist policies