ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

cars on delivery

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72682
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

phil36500 wrote:No cars on delivery again for "SOME"of us in our office. Manager had to drop us out , didn't have clue where he was going. Got their backs up a bit they have now started saying that when it is light we have to come back to the office to pick up another walk .What do you think about that then?
Thats summer lapsing and were on strike already? - DO Job right and finish is ok
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Spedley
Posts: 1209
Joined: 16 Jul 2007, 17:32
Location: Warwickshire

Post by Spedley »

IWW Fellow Worker wrote:
Spedley wrote:... and wear Royal Mail boots and shoes, don't pay for the wear and tear on your own footware.
Walk around all gardens and don't take short cuts.
Don't walk and read at the same time.
Do the job properly - the RIGHT way- and don't give give Royal Mail anything.
There! Now you're talking.
I don't think I will ever get my point accross. :(
Carnoustie
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 793
Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 22:00

Post by Carnoustie »

Spedley wrote:... and wear Royal Mail boots and shoes, don't pay for the wear and tear on your own footware.
Walk around all gardens and don't take short cuts.
Don't walk and read at the same time.
Do the job properly - the hard way - and don't give give Royal Mail anything.
Spedley, what the heck do you mean about not ever getting your point across ?

First, you try to say that using your car doesn't save Royal Mail money or threaten the job of the person who would otherwise be needed to take you out to your starting point. Several people have posted sound arguments that prove that morally and logically, your actions are threatening yours and your colleagues livelihoods, and exposing you to risk of being held personally liable for any theft of mail from your vehicle.

Then you make this other post about shoes, short-cuts etc etc, which seems totally at odds with your initial post !

Now that can make me draw one of only 2 conclusions.

Either

1. you have realised that using your car is detrimental to yours and everybody else's interests, and are now advocating that we all stop doing these other things that may, in the longer term, also give Royal Mail scope to cut even more duties, OR

2. you are trying to justify using your car by saying that unless we stop doing these other things, not using your car won't make a difference.

Well, if your 'point' is as per the second conclusion, to my mind, that puts you in the same category of absurdity as the postman I know who has claimed 'one or two people are not going to make any difference' when asked why he gave a lift in his car to one of the strike-breakers, just before he himself went and stood on the picket-line :crazy:

Your position, like his, is untenable. That's why you don't seem able to get your point across :d'oh!



Editor's note:

untenable
Adjective
1. (of theories etc) incapable of being defended or justified
Spedley
Posts: 1209
Joined: 16 Jul 2007, 17:32
Location: Warwickshire

Post by Spedley »

It was meant to be ironic. Not in a nasty way but to emphasise that doing a job the hardway just to keep it is not a real job.

Justifying any job on the basis of how slow and inefficient you can make it is just plain daft.

irony
Noun
1. form of speech in which the real meaning is concealed or contradicted by the words used
phil36500
Posts: 44
Joined: 05 Jul 2007, 14:05

Post by phil36500 »

Spedley wrote:It was irony. Not in a nasty way but to emphasise that doing a job the hardway just to keep it is not a real job.

Justifying any job on the basis of how slow and inefficient you can make it is just plain daft.

irony
Noun
1. form of speech in which the real meaning is concealed or contradicted by the words used
The thing is though not everyone works at the same speed, i've been on my walk for 3 years now and the majority i work to my time but when i'm off on leave and someone younger covers me they finish alot earlier, now what if the manager says well if he can do it in 3 hrs why can't you?
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Post by DGP1 »

Spedley wrote:It was meant to be ironic. Not in a nasty way but to emphasise that doing a job the hardway just to keep it is not a real job.

Justifying any job on the basis of how slow and inefficient you can make it is just plain daft.

irony
Noun
1. form of speech in which the real meaning is concealed or contradicted by the words used
Image Ironic is when they give you extra work because you finish early or whenever you get sacked because you had post stolen from your car :arrrghhh
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72682
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Spedley wrote:Justifying any job on the basis of how slow and inefficient you can make it is just plain daft.
We are not trying to justify the job based on that. What we are trying to point out to Royal Mail is that we are not under worked and overpaid as we take great pride in our job and want to do it to the benefit of everyone including ourselves. When you work to the rules as RM have laid down it helps point out the absurdity of their position.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Carnoustie
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 793
Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 22:00

Post by Carnoustie »

Spedley wrote:It was meant to be ironic. Not in a nasty way but to emphasise that doing a job the hardway just to keep it is not a real job.

Justifying any job on the basis of how slow and inefficient you can make it is just plain daft.

irony
Noun
1. form of speech in which the real meaning is concealed or contradicted by the words used
I'll tell you what I think is plain daft.

Imagine for a moment Spedley, that you were running your own business. You're paying one of your employees eight hours wages per day, five days a week, to do a certain number of tasks. He regularly demonstrates an ability to complete all his tasks well within that time, and goes home early every day. You're not interested really if he's spending his own money to get the job done more quickly - hell, it's coming out of his pocket, you're laughing. Quite literally. But, sooner or later, you're going to get round to thinking one of two things, namely

"if he gets all his work done with time to spare, I'll whack a bigger workload onto his job", or
"when he leaves, there's no way I'm advertising his job as a full-time post. If the tasks can be completed within part-time hours, which he's demonstrated to me that they can, a part-time job is all I'll offer"
mylegshurt
Posts: 194
Joined: 18 Jul 2007, 13:06

Post by mylegshurt »

that is spot on mate. if they want to be pedantic ,so be it. ill shut every gate, not cross any lawns,not step over any walls,not enter any garden that has a dog in it, f**k me i just dropped me fag, hang on.right where were we.right,ill not read the address of any customer whilst i am walking[health and safety] ill park my car[bike] at the begining of round as do as 318 specifies. the likes of i f****d up the FA, and mr no clue cause im in canada havnt got a clue. They have stepped off of sanity beach and burst everyones rubber ring tooboot.l
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Post by DGP1 »

I'll tell you what I think is plain daft.

Imagine for a moment Spedley, that you were running your own business. You're paying one of your employees eight hours wages per day, five days a week, to do a certain number of tasks. He regularly demonstrates an ability to complete all his tasks well within that time, and goes home early every day. You're not interested really if he's spending his own money to get the job done more quickly - hell, it's coming out of his pocket, you're laughing. Quite literally. But, sooner or later, you're going to get round to thinking one of two things, namely

"if he gets all his work done with time to spare, I'll whack a bigger workload onto his job", or
"when he leaves, there's no way I'm advertising his job as a full-time post. If the tasks can be completed within part-time hours, which he's demonstrated to me that they can, a part-time job is all I'll offer"

:Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
drb
Posts: 1044
Joined: 30 Jan 2007, 21:44
Gender: Male

Post by drb »

How very true Carmoustie.The trouble is Royal Mail encouraged us to "crack on". Mr Leighton's letter in 2003 sais "finish early".
We bought that rubbish.Now look.
The Sarge
Posts: 122
Joined: 30 Jul 2007, 19:57
Location: Where the action is

CARNOUSTIE ROCKS!

Post by The Sarge »

If you want the corrosive effect of cars on delivery try these for size:
1. We have at least 2 (young) lads in the DO who are on van duties but PREFER to take their cars on delivery, as they can get finished earlier and don't have to take parcels. The Gaffers love this as it 'frees up a van' to get them out of some hole they have dug for themselves. MADNESS.

2. On other van duties when the duty holder is off they put a 'car user' on the shift and take the van away (again to sort out some sort of mess). Any protestations from the incumbent Postie are met with "well you usually use your car" from the Gaffers.

DON'T ANYBODY TELL ME THAT CAR USE ON DELIVERY IS 'OK'.

Image
[/quote]
side_door
Posts: 72
Joined: 10 May 2007, 18:07
Location: Nottingham

Post by side_door »

ill park my car[bike] at the begining of round as do as 318 specifies
I do not have a 318 and am not likely ever to get one. However, I am interested in this observation. Can you point me to some RM documentation which states that the bike should be left at the start of the walk. I have loads of dead walking on mine and have to use the bike to collect bags from the pouch box. Successive managers have for at least 5 years refused to even consider putting in a pouch box.
Delivery Postman (AG)
Nottingham
coppertop
Posts: 229
Joined: 27 May 2007, 17:17

Cars

Post by coppertop »

As I have said in an earlier post our previous union rep (he moved up the chain of command and well deserved it was to) refused to disscuss with our dum the use of cars on delivery as it was against RM's enviromental policies. This should be put to all dum's Royal Mail support all things enviromentally friendly they like to be seen to be GREEN (IN MORE WAY'S THAN ONE). :lfo :lfo :cfo :nana The use of cars on delivery is not good period.