What you have to realise POSTMAN is our revision hasn't just crept up on us...this isn't plan A.POSTMAN wrote:But Fish,you guys still voted it in! Have i missed something.
Now let's say for instance my place,now we know all the walks ect,if something was put out that the whole office knew was f****d we wouldn't vote it in.
The next question i guess is where to next after that...
Plan A was a 0700 start...a 4.30 delivery...ridiculous walks and 3 part-timers made up to full-time and the part-timers without a saturday off..
Plan (roughly g or h) is a 4.10 delivery,hopefully more reasonable walks,11 part-timers made up,EVERYONE in the office with 1 in 4 sats off(apart from the wallingtons who didn't want it) and an agreement to substantive contracts for all after the 6 week bedding in period.
That has taken 6 months of hard work.
What lets it down and what will in my opinion lead to the failure of the revision is the IWT based on the model weeks 11-17...it is too harsh but if we had changed model weeks we would have lost much that we had gained elsewhere.
We cannot change the IWT only what's put into it and that was checked a dozen times so like you say...then what?