Tamsky wrote:RM Policy has been issued called Retention of vehicles overnight. Ask DOM to print it off the intranet and post it up.
There is already a copy of it on here....http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... 6&p=294715" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I don't know if it's been updated though...this one is dated 22 September 2009 (Version 10).
countyboy wrote:Does this not have tax implications ?..Pre RM in my other life I had company cars for years...You get nailed for tax as a beneift in kind as soon as there is any aspect of personal use which I imagine would include driving to and from work,,
No it's been checked out.
As long as the vehicle is used primarily for travelling to and from work it's not considered a perk.
As far as using one...fine as long as you have clearly defined guidelines on damage/theft liability i don't see a problem.
It's better than wrecking your own car to go to work.
Sounds good to me...It will come in really handy for taking crap to the tip on a Sunday !! (Oops,,sorry Mr Taxman )
I am not aware of any current reason for people taking vehicles home and the CDV rules for the new understanding is not a perk but because RM will not in some cases have sufficient parking space at the DO - and that is position taken by RM on taking vehicles home. It will not/should not be a free for all for exactly the same reason someone pointed out - cost.
slave wrote:The people that take vans home are probably the same people that used to run around and use their own cars on delivery!!
I say no, in my office a lot of people said no, not got vans yet though.
Not a chance I'm having the hassle of providing work with a parking space, the issue of security - lets see how many vans get broken into before RM stops vans at home!!
What about going on leave or sick - sounds like a lot of messing about...?
That's probably the most retarded sentence i've read on here and that's saying something. If you are allowed to take the van home then it's insured, it's not a company car as we're not taxed so it will be the same as a pool car system.
If you don't want to because of parking etc then fair enough, but don't make stupid statements like 'the people that take them home run around delivery'
countyboy wrote:Does this not have tax implications ?..Pre RM in my other life I had company cars for years...You get nailed for tax as a beneift in kind as soon as there is any aspect of personal use which I imagine would include driving to and from work,,
No it's been checked out.
As long as the vehicle is used primarily for travelling to and from work it's not considered a perk.
As far as using one...fine as long as you have clearly defined guidelines on damage/theft liability i don't see a problem.
It's better than wrecking your own car to go to work.
However, if the driver covers no private mileage in the van, he or she will not have to pay company van tax. The taxman does not count driving the van between home and work as private mileage. So if you take the van home at night and do no other mileage, you do not have to pay company van tax.
However, if the driver covers no private mileage in the van, he or she will not have to pay company van tax. The taxman does not count driving the van between home and work as private mileage. So if you take the van home at night and do no other mileage, you do not have to pay company van tax.
Thats pretty clear. So RM van clogs up my drive serving no useful purpose other than me keeping it safe for the company....Errr...let me think about that for a nano second...No Thanks !!!
Last edited by TrueBlueTerrier on 26 Sep 2010, 08:18, edited 2 times in total.
Reason:Will people please leave in the [quote] and [/quote] tags in quoted posts otherwise it corrupts your post and makes it harder to read
What worries me is if the wife has to ride in the back to tell me how to drive, when to turn, how to avoid pedestrians, what speed I should be doing - you know just your average vehicle journey..............................
slave wrote:The people that take vans home are probably the same people that used to run around and use their own cars on delivery!!
I say no, in my office a lot of people said no, not got vans yet though.
Not a chance I'm having the hassle of providing work with a parking space, the issue of security - lets see how many vans get broken into before RM stops vans at home!!
What about going on leave or sick - sounds like a lot of messing about...?
That's probably the most retarded sentence i've read on here and that's saying something. If you are allowed to take the van home then it's insured, it's not a company car as we're not taxed so it will be the same as a pool car system.
If you don't want to because of parking etc then fair enough, but don't make stupid statements like 'the people that take them home run around delivery'
And your reply is about as retarded as it gets too - you're obviously rather blinkered in your view of RM, one of the people that makes this job s**t.
So then, why is it stupid, come on gobby, why is it stupid to suggest people that run round now and use cars now would want vans to take home - all so they can continue running round and stick with that stupid idea of finishing early that has dropped us all right in the brown stuff... Why not drive back to the office in RM time, hand over keys, 739s blah etc all in works time and then leave the van at the office? Not rocket science is it?
I can't understand why anyone would see it as a benefit - it's purely for RM's benefit otherwise they would NOT have suggested it!!!!