ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

BA and union talks stopped by protesters

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
Tman
Posts: 4134
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Re: BA and union talks stopped by protesters

Post by Tman »

Don't be so obtuse. Better weather means duffel coats are replaced by donkey jackets, and if it's really warm, then Anarchy t-shirts are the norm.
Been the same now for many years; those clothes and sharing a bus is the closest any of them get to anything even resembling a "worker". :left:
Good C-T theory too. Willie and Unite told the SWP the when and where of this meeting, and arranged for the door to be left open...all it need now is a motive.. :wink:
borders
Posts: 1303
Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 09:10

Re: BA and union talks stopped by protesters

Post by borders »

using a word such as obtuse , is one reason why many on here have a big problem with the manner and content of your posts . you are out of order...
"why should it just be the bankers, politicians and the idle rich who get all the best things ? we demand a standard of living for our members that enables them to share in the fine wines and times that the likes of Cameron and his Eton buddies take for granted " - the late great Bob Crow RIP.
brothermagrew
Posts: 3015
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 16:38
Gender: Male
Location: Shares a border with England to the south.

Re: BA and union talks stopped by protesters

Post by brothermagrew »

borders wrote:using a word such as obtuse , is one reason why many on here have a big problem with the manner and content of your posts . you are out of order...
Well in the land of the blueshirts dictionary I think he has just called you stupid :no no naughty, naughty :no no Mr Tman.
"Today’s workplace has become heartless and soulless. Employees are seen as units of labour, automatons, functionaries, objects for achieving designated tasks, and as costs to be minimised."
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: BA and union talks stopped by protesters

Post by fishtank »

brothermagrew wrote:
borders wrote:using a word such as obtuse , is one reason why many on here have a big problem with the manner and content of your posts . you are out of order...
Well in the land of the blueshirts dictionary I think he has just called you stupid :no no naughty, naughty :no no Mr Tman.

Completely out of character for Tman......... :cuppa
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
andy2007
Posts: 3971
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 10:16
Gender: Male
Location: Earth

Re: BA and union talks stopped by protesters

Post by andy2007 »

borders wrote:using a word such as obtuse , is one reason why many on here have a big problem with the manner and content of your posts . you are out of order...
Why? :confused
What's wrong with the word obtuse?
I don't agree with his opinion, but there's nothing wrong with making efficient use of language. :hmmmm
Don't knock Insanity
it's just another outlook on Reality!
andy2007
Posts: 3971
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 10:16
Gender: Male
Location: Earth

Re: BA and union talks stopped by protesters

Post by andy2007 »

LJR wrote:
andy2007 wrote:It's beginning to sound like there was an Agent Provocateur at work here. :hmmmm Particularly as they knew exactly where to go, and there was no security to stop them. The plot thickens..... :hmmmm
Seen the news? So called perks! This thing could have gone away if the strikers got the same perks as the strike breakers that Walsh took away in the first place! Walsh is there to smash the Union. We as workers get LIED to every day of our working week and thats just RM, please dont buy into it. Our own Government have had a hand in killing well over 250.000 people as well as our brave service people on a LIE so its not new! Ask where the CCTV that catches a small group of pick pockets was when 200 people ran away from 100s of police officers that did not notice whilst this was going on? Ask why the staff of the hotel couldnt get help with 100s of police officers around the corner? Sorry but how thick do they think we are?
That's exactly why it's such a big problem that the talks were prevented. The longer this goes on, the longer the brave Trade Unionists will have to suffer. Particularly as some of them have to commute over large distances, which means flying (hence the need for the perks in the first place). And of course the fact that they're now loosing money from the Strikes, whilst their collegues who cross the Picket Lines, loose nothing. :evil/mad

They probably wouldn't have negotiated a settlement anyway. But that's not the point. There's always a possibility of a breakthrough. But that chance was taken away from them, by those protesters. They should have waited until the talks were concluded, before making their move. That way, they would have still been able to protest, but wouldn't have prevented the albeit slight, chance of a successful resolution. :hmmmm
Don't knock Insanity
it's just another outlook on Reality!
Lounge Lizard
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 9458
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54

Re: BA and union talks stopped by protesters

Post by Lounge Lizard »

It's interesting how perks are an ever increasingly important issue in industrial disputes. :shock:
I can forsee us having a good mandate for a fully justified strike in the future and the CWU then telling Royal Mail that we will go back to work immediately if they give us back our fifty stamps at Christmas. :crazy: :nana :crazy:
Tman
Posts: 4134
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Re: BA and union talks stopped by protesters

Post by Tman »

borders wrote:using a word such as obtuse , is one reason why many on here have a big problem with the manner and content of your posts . you are out of order...
I hope you're not playing the old "I'm hurt by your comments" game? :silenced

Actually, should you reread the thread, you might see that I'm gently mocking the SWP rather than borders, so alternatively I could have written-
"don't be daft, better weather means etc etc" which hopefully you'd see was irony towards the SWP than an insult towards borders?

{Well, unless you'd then moan because you felt you'd been called "daft"....which probably meant that the obtuse cap fitted rather well in the first place........... :chuckle
LJR
Posts: 113
Joined: 28 Aug 2007, 16:26
Gender: Male

Re: BA and union talks stopped by protesters

Post by LJR »

andy2007 wrote:
LJR wrote:
andy2007 wrote:It's beginning to sound like there was an Agent Provocateur at work here. :hmmmm Particularly as they knew exactly where to go, and there was no security to stop them. The plot thickens..... :hmmmm
Seen the news? So called perks! This thing could have gone away if the strikers got the same perks as the strike breakers that Walsh took away in the first place! Walsh is there to smash the Union. We as workers get LIED to every day of our working week and thats just RM, please dont buy into it. Our own Government have had a hand in killing well over 250.000 people as well as our brave service people on a LIE so its not new! Ask where the CCTV that catches a small group of pick pockets was when 200 people ran away from 100s of police officers that did not notice whilst this was going on? Ask why the staff of the hotel couldnt get help with 100s of police officers around the corner? Sorry but how thick do they think we are?
That's exactly why it's such a big problem that the talks were prevented. The longer this goes on, the longer the brave Trade Unionists will have to suffer. Particularly as some of them have to commute over large distances, which means flying (hence the need for the perks in the first place). And of course the fact that they're now loosing money from the Strikes, whilst their collegues who cross the Picket Lines, loose nothing. :evil/mad

They probably wouldn't have negotiated a settlement anyway. But that's not the point. There's always a possibility of a breakthrough. But that chance was taken away from them, by those protesters. They should have waited until the talks were concluded, before making their move. That way, they would have still been able to protest, but wouldn't have prevented the albeit slight, chance of a successful resolution. :hmmmm
Well we look at things differently then. It would seem to be widely known that the cuts are agreed by the big wigs both BA and Unite the only sticking point would be the perks that that strike breakers get and Trade Unionist don’t. Unite said after that SWP? Farce give our members the perks back that you give to strike breakers and we will call the strikes off. These perks are a nothing to BA its the spare seats or jump seats that staff use, the same as our redi / keepsafe perks we enjoy ect at RM. ( How would you feel if the strike breakers got our perks and because you went out you didn’t get them? It seems a lot to us as postmen but these seats are EMPTY.
I agree fools went there to cause trouble but my point is IT SHOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED! HOW DID IT? It is not possible. If you don’t agree that’s fair enough but don’t brush over the issue and just say some loons spoilt this with out wondering and questioning why. At the end of the day it was the SWP not UNITE that did this? and Walsh wasted the chance to end this strike for the good of his firm, customers, shareholders and workers over bullsh*t and we all need to wonder why!
CONDEMNATION.
borders
Posts: 1303
Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 09:10

Re: BA and union talks stopped by protesters

Post by borders »

andy2007 wrote:
borders wrote:using a word such as obtuse , is one reason why many on here have a big problem with the manner and content of your posts . you are out of order...
Why? :confused
What's wrong with the word obtuse?
I don't agree with his opinion, but there's nothing wrong with making efficient use of language. :hmmmm
dictionary -- obtuse-- mentally slow, not pointed, dull, stupid. now considering he does not know me from Adam do you honestly think that word is appropiate. i dont give a toss about his views ,he used obtuse to describe me rather than my comment. when you stoop so low to insult someone you dont even know on an internet forum for christs sake, kinda sums you up in my book...
"why should it just be the bankers, politicians and the idle rich who get all the best things ? we demand a standard of living for our members that enables them to share in the fine wines and times that the likes of Cameron and his Eton buddies take for granted " - the late great Bob Crow RIP.
Tman
Posts: 4134
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Re: BA and union talks stopped by protesters

Post by Tman »

,
he used obtuse to describe me rather than my comment. when you stoop so low to insult someone you dont even know on an internet forum for christs sake, kinda sums you up in my book...
Still banging the drum,eh?
I suppose if someone doesn't understand the nuances of "spoken" English even when it's been pointed out to them, then so many things must seem like "insults".
{Unless it's really just a way of deflecting and defending the SWP against criticism when there's no other rationale left... :wink: }
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: BA and union talks stopped by protesters

Post by fishtank »

Tman wrote:,
he used obtuse to describe me rather than my comment. when you stoop so low to insult someone you dont even know on an internet forum for christs sake, kinda sums you up in my book...
Still banging the drum,eh?
I suppose if someone doesn't understand the nuances of "spoken" English even when it's been pointed out to them, then so many things must seem like "insults".
{Unless it's really just a way of deflecting and defending the SWP against criticism when there's no other rationale left... :wink: }

Tman...almost every post you contribute to ends in a personal slanging match with someone.
Why?......... :nervous
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
motherhubbard
Posts: 1001
Joined: 08 Feb 2010, 17:13
Gender: Female
Location: in the cupboard

Re: BA and union talks stopped by protesters

Post by motherhubbard »

fishtank wrote: Tman...almost every post you contribute to ends in a personal slanging match with someone.
Why?......... :nervous
It may have something to do with self-loathing
Never let the hand you hold, hold you down.
Tman
Posts: 4134
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Re: BA and union talks stopped by protesters

Post by Tman »

Tman...almost every post you contribute to ends in a personal slanging match with someone.
Why?.......
Who knows? In this particular case the poster didn't understand the point even when pointed out to him/her, and as a consequence took it down the "oooh I'm so insulted" route. Sadly posters don't like criticism of thier particular sacred cow.. :wink:

Then again, RMC has been shown (in the 2007 yes vote, and again recently with another Yes vote; I won't even mention the ostrich-like denial of many to the "mail volumes ain't dropping threads!) to be a perfect example of so-called "group-think" and without wishing to sound too much like RMC's very own Wiki-man :wink: , it's obvious that many opinions on here have more to do with "wot he said" than any logical conclusion drawn by the individual, or any basis in fact.
Question any of those, and who knows what sort of response may be forthcoming... I mean, you may even get some reply about burger-flipping or the standby "your a manger" (sic) :chuckle
borders
Posts: 1303
Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 09:10

Re: BA and union talks stopped by protesters

Post by borders »

Tman wrote:Don't be so obtuse. Better weather means duffel coats are replaced by donkey jackets, and if it's really warm, then Anarchy t-shirts are the norm.
Been the same now for many years; those clothes and sharing a bus is the closest any of them get to anything even resembling a "worker". :left:
Good C-T theory too. Willie and Unite told the SWP the when and where of this meeting, and arranged for the door to be left open...all it need now is a motive.. :wink:
yeah i am going to bang the drum again. i understand the meaning of written English as you obviously do , hence all the other bollocks you have written to try and deflect what you meant. like i said before you used obtuse to describe me rather than my comment. when you stoop so low to insult someone you dont even know on an internet forum for christs sake, kinda sums you up in my book... seems a few other people agree too.. feel free to rubbish my comments [ hmmm you already do ] but less of the personel insults.
"why should it just be the bankers, politicians and the idle rich who get all the best things ? we demand a standard of living for our members that enables them to share in the fine wines and times that the likes of Cameron and his Eton buddies take for granted " - the late great Bob Crow RIP.