ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

a yes vote and you all are up s**t creek without one

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72713
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: a yes vote and you all are up s**t creek without one

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Tman wrote:Did you post that sentence or not?
Yes
Tman wrote: If you did, did you mean it in some way other than how it looks?
No
Tman wrote:Looks pretty unequivocal to me, and didn't appear to have it's meaning changed by anything subsequent to it.
The either your comprehension of the English Language is different to mine or you don't agree with the qualifiers in the later text.

For example

it looked as though some on the machines had to be octopuses
Other people have mentioned it to me as well, even MC posties
It would help both types of Unit understand the problems each other face

Hardly indicative of the "Them and Us" attitude you accused me of. My intention was to address that very same attitude you accused me of, and shown by some others who have apparently never worked outside of their own function.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Tman
Posts: 4143
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Re: a yes vote and you all are up s**t creek without one

Post by Tman »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
Tman wrote:Did you post that sentence or not?
Yes
Tman wrote: If you did, did you mean it in some way other than how it looks?
No
Tman wrote:Looks pretty unequivocal to me, and didn't appear to have it's meaning changed by anything subsequent to it.
The either your comprehension of the English Language is different to mine or you don't agree with the qualifiers in the later text.

Or it's a bad case of back-pedalling.... :no no
Not being nasty but TBH I cant wait till all MCs Posties have to work as Hard as DO Posties.
Is just a spiteful and over-generalised (if not bigoted) statement. Why would someone/ anyone even post something like this in the current climate of (alleged) RM divide and rule over the ballot? :sad:
marky
Posts: 402
Joined: 18 May 2007, 23:41
Gender: Male
Location: could be barred

Re: a yes vote and you all are up s**t creek without one

Post by marky »

everyone knows that delivery office workers work harder than all the rm staff
the crap deal is aimed at delivery posties thats why the mail centers will vote yes and as usual shaft those poor over worked delivery posties for a few quid more. greed plays a big part.
rmld.....
pcb
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 392
Joined: 21 May 2007, 11:32

Re: a yes vote and you all are up s**t creek without one

Post by pcb »

Yes I agree if I could go in early and use my car DOH! can't fit it through the doors and then I can work for 3 and half hours non stop! DOH! do 4 hours NON STOP now! and then I can go home before my time DOH can't do that got to get the clearance!
Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.
John Stuart Mill
not me
Posts: 2735
Joined: 10 Aug 2007, 15:07
Gender: Female
Location: Uranus

Re: a yes vote and you all are up s**t creek without one

Post by not me »

pcb wrote:Yes I agree if I could go in early and use my car DOH! can't fit it through the doors and then I can work for 3 and half hours non stop! DOH! do 4 hours NON STOP now! and then I can go home before my time DOH can't do that got to get the clearance!

and theres the issue
you have MC staff coming out with statements like DO staff need to work 8 hours and a deal on the table that basically leaves the MC's alone(for now) while shafting the DO's(even more)
pcb
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 392
Joined: 21 May 2007, 11:32

Re: a yes vote and you all are up s**t creek without one

Post by pcb »

Ever since I joined the CWU delivery have used their cars, gone in early and gone home early. The union told delivery time and time again that RM will one day stop the perks!
Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.
John Stuart Mill
not me
Posts: 2735
Joined: 10 Aug 2007, 15:07
Gender: Female
Location: Uranus

Re: a yes vote and you all are up s**t creek without one

Post by not me »

pcb wrote:Ever since I joined the CWU delivery have used their cars, gone in early and gone home early. The union told delivery time and time again that RM will one day stop the perks!

now add the word 'some'
seems you are quite keen to shaft the DO's,im sure you will be happy to accept the job cuts in the MC's since the DO's have been making the bulk of the cuts so far?
pcb
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 392
Joined: 21 May 2007, 11:32

Re: a yes vote and you all are up s**t creek without one

Post by pcb »

Amazing MCs were against the WFA 2000 and delivery were not. A DEMOCRATIC VOTE was taken and we excepted the deal. Shift allowance for early shift was taken out 2 years ago! For my area there was alot of DOs which did not come out last time around! MC was out every time! IF a new prduct comes on line we in the MCs don't get paid extra it goes into workolad to ensure full time jobs. Anyway do the MATHS at present 51.4 million is spent on D2D to those who do it under this deal it rises to 54 Million and ALL DELIVERY get it. By your reckoning you wnat to deprive those in delivery who don't at present get anything and should ensure full time jobs!
Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.
John Stuart Mill
not me
Posts: 2735
Joined: 10 Aug 2007, 15:07
Gender: Female
Location: Uranus

Re: a yes vote and you all are up s**t creek without one

Post by not me »

pcb wrote:Amazing MCs were against the WFA 2000 and delivery were not. A DEMOCRATIC VOTE was taken and we excepted the deal. Shift allowance for early shift was taken out 2 years ago! For my area there was alot of DOs which did not come out last time around! MC was out every time! IF a new prduct comes on line we in the MCs don't get paid extra it goes into workolad to ensure full time jobs. Anyway do the MATHS at present 51.4 million is spent on D2D to those who do it under this deal it rises to 54 Million and ALL DELIVERY get it. By your reckoning you wnat to deprive those in delivery who don't at present get anything and should ensure full time jobs!

so on the D2D issue alone the DO's should vote yes?
i dont want to deprive anyone of wages however where do you get that D2D's will ensure FT jobs?
thats not the business plan DO's are working towards
you realise right now many delivery staff struggle to do the D2D's they have,removing the ceiling just opens the floodgates for more pressure on staff with unachievable targets
pcb
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 392
Joined: 21 May 2007, 11:32

Re: a yes vote and you all are up s**t creek without one

Post by pcb »

D2D into workload!
Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.
John Stuart Mill
not me
Posts: 2735
Joined: 10 Aug 2007, 15:07
Gender: Female
Location: Uranus

Re: a yes vote and you all are up s**t creek without one

Post by not me »

pcb wrote:D2D into workload!

and who dictates what is an achievable workload?
we already have many offices with unachievable delivery spans
so adding uncapped D2D's does not bode well for it being combined with 'workload'