Although who could take any party seriously when it uses a word like "bankster"?
I wonder if the Far Left and Far Right have a competition to see who can use the worst cliche or the most purple prose...
Not it wasn't but when people like yourself come on here to start a thread to call the BNP fascists and call on people to fight them on the streets perhaps there needs to be a bit of redress?clashcityrocker wrote: If anyone wanted to read the s**t on the BNP website they could do so of their own free will.
I didn't think RMC was set up to promulgate racist crap.
And yes they are fascists.
This is total nonsense. You are basically saying - abandon all principles because they will rock the Capitalist boat.pcb wrote:opgpat: Sounds great! fasicsts always telling workers we will insist on British jobs for British workers. Reality capitalism will not allow it.
So how are you going to trade? 2.5 million Brits work in Europe are they going to be sent back as countires start to retaliate?
Bankers withdraw from Britain set up somewhere else.
Free enterprise means no restrictions so thats British jobs for British workers gone then! How do businesses make money every year? by cutting operational costs!
Corporate law concieved in USA and I would like to see the BNP try and get them to change it!
Living in cockoo land.
USA in hock to China in the tune of billions
Where is the BNP going to get its money from because financial monopolies would be laughing their socks off!
But well done for trying.
Sorry RMC as an entity (if it can beclashcityrocker wrote:If anyone wanted to read the s**t on the BNP website they could do so of their own free will.opgpat wrote: Here are some excerpts from the BNP (who are not fascists)
I didn't think RMC was set up to promulgate racist crap.
And yes they are fascists.
Surely there is a difference between answering questions on the party you support and using RMC to air the views of the party you actively campaign for.TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
Sorry RMC as an entity (if it can be) must and will remain apolitical and as such we cannot stop people politely answering questions on their own political views or of the party they support.
clashcityrocker wrote:Surely there is a difference between answering questions on the party you support and using RMC to air the views of the party you actively campaign for.TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
Sorry RMC as an entity (if it can be) must and will remain apolitical and as such we cannot stop people politely answering questions on their own political views or of the party they support.
If not, then why was one member asked to leave when they tried to get their BNP mates to come on RMC to "wind us up".
Asking him to leave doesn't look like an apolitical decision.
Hello mother can you see meshimmyrule wrote:just used the foe application the now, crikey the forum has 3 members on it now
Absolutely right, millions of volunteers selflessly fought and died to protect the freedoms from fear and dictatorship that we enjoy in Europe today. Tyranny and dictatorship should never be accepted yet some so-called liberal minded people seem to think that denying others their legally accepted and expressed political beliefs is OK when infact that act of political intolerance is a prime example of the fascistic practice they claim to oppose. Hypocritical.TrueBlueTerrier wrote: In World War 2 this country fought 2 totalitarian states partly on the stance of defending Democracies. Being a democracy means that everyone has a right to hold their own views and to air them.
well thats one thing you cant complain about, you have certainly had the opportunity to air your political beliefs !!!opgpat wrote:Absolutely right, millions of volunteers selflessly fought and died to protect the freedoms from fear and dictatorship that we enjoy in Europe today. Tyranny and dictatorship should never be accepted yet some so-called liberal minded people seem to think that denying others their legally accepted and expressed political beliefs is OK when infact that act of political intolerance is a prime example of the fascistic practice they claim to oppose. Hypocritical.TrueBlueTerrier wrote: In World War 2 this country fought 2 totalitarian states partly on the stance of defending Democracies. Being a democracy means that everyone has a right to hold their own views and to air them.
clashcityrocker wrote:This really is a myth that democracy allows free speech.
Free speech is only allowed as long as it is lawful - even at Speaker's Corner.
Was the BNP constitution lawful? Was the very foundation on which that party stood lawful? No.
I understand the argument that the only solution to the abuse of freedom is more freedom. I just don't buy it.
No freedoms for the enemies of Freedom.