Night Tonic wrote:POSTMAN wrote:Night Tonic wrote:Every thread on here seems to be the same one, rephrased with the usual bods hoping that if they say NO enough, it might rub off. Those that do want to vote YES don't bother posting after a while or won't come on here anyway, which leaves a minority pinning its hopes on polls that are totally meaningless.

You read em all

Indeed, but with the same cynicism as CWU HQ I should think. This site once had CWU logos all over it. Wonder why they disappeared soon after and a hastily written footnote that the site was not affiliated with the CWU?
This gets your goat don't it as this is about the 3rd time you have posted this,and i've never had the time to answer you until now.And also for anyone esle who is interested.
You are referring to the site in it's early days,yes the 'vote yes' banners were there,because that is at the time what i wanted to happen,people to vote yes for the strikes that is.
It was the portal then,but it seems you have not visited the front page over the years or you would be aware that the site has changed it's format a few times.
The reason being that i felt it was wrong what i did,my personal views should not dictate what is on the front page.
Yes tbf i am biased with what goes on there,but much of it is because i do not have the time (or the writing talent)at the moment to put up what i would want up there.
This will hopefuly change in the summer when i will have more time to spend on here.
There is a lot of 'no' vote talk on here and you will be aware that i posted a topic
http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... 42&t=25012" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; which i stated in it...
EDIT:Forgot to mention,i will try and use the comments as an article for the front page.
Both sides of the fence will get their air time.
But i have not had the time to finish it off.
The footnote thing has been there for a couple of years and teebs will vouch it was not hastily written.The reason being because it is true and also i was geting a lot of email from people who thought we were an official RM site.
I don't drag militants of the street to come on here,what is on here is being said in many RM canteens around the country.
If we followed the rules strictly then most would be banned at times,regardless of what side of the fence they are.But would be nice if the adults on here actually started to behave like one!!
Not worried about CWU HQ,but it was nice of them to give us a 'near' plug when Wardy mentioned that the agreement was online a week before it was officially released on 'a website' when reps questioned why they only had 2 days to read it before the Bournemouth briefing.
Or a DIV rep 'lifting' stuff off the site for his own gain but then criticising the site when pulled up over his vote yes flyer.
Seems you're bored with it though Nighty,might be time for a change for you mate.