ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Sacked for not risking my life

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Just_My_Opinion
Posts: 139
Joined: 10 Mar 2010, 16:23
Gender: Female

Re: Sacked for not risking my life

Post by Just_My_Opinion »

gone wrote:Can royal mail sack sum one on the grounds of abandonment of duty cos they had to leave the floor to take an insulin injection for diabetes?? And is the union going to stand by and let this happen without a fight??... We need help in our office as the union reps r best friends with the Dom n go drinking with him, n don't want to upset him, so we the union members suffer

I know a local man who worked in a factory. Some people hid his insulin as they thought it's be funny. Obviously it wasn't. However he panicked and left the premises to get home to get his insulin. He was sacked as a result as his employer stated there was a nurse on site who could of provided the insulin. He stated he needed his insulin and was very worried and the only thing going through his head was getting his insulin which he knew was at home.

He successfully pursued a case against his employer and 2 years later he received compensation of £35,000.
opgpat
Posts: 878
Joined: 08 Oct 2007, 21:56

Re: Sacked for not risking my life

Post by opgpat »

rambo79 wrote:If you left your point of duty without permission the line manager is within their rights to challenge u and if they deem it necessary award a conduct penalty, your diabetes is a secondary factor, the point is u took it upon yourself just to leave your place of work. If i was your line manager I would succesfully argue that the fact that u have this condition and left the floor without informing someone put u at greater risk, what If u had collapsed? Managers have a duty of care and u would lose any appeal. And I'd stake my life u already have a penalty on your record!
What a disgraceful answer. What an excuse for a human being.

This is why we need Union representation in the workplace, it says it ALL.
Himaggen
Posts: 993
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 23:40

Re: Sacked for not risking my life

Post by Himaggen »

opgpat wrote:
rambo79 wrote:If you left your point of duty without permission the line manager is within their rights to challenge u and if they deem it necessary award a conduct penalty, your diabetes is a secondary factor, the point is u took it upon yourself just to leave your place of work. If i was your line manager I would succesfully argue that the fact that u have this condition and left the floor without informing someone put u at greater risk, what If u had collapsed? Managers have a duty of care and u would lose any appeal. And I'd stake my life u already have a penalty on your record!
What a disgraceful answer. What an excuse for a human being.

This is why we need Union representation in the workplace, it says it ALL.
Actually there's nothing disgraceful in that answer at all, it is in fact a correct response to the question raised. Having the medical condition should not preclude you from following basic rules, if you need to leave the point of duty you should have informed the appropriate person before doing so.

You may be able to provide information which could be used to justify why you failed to inform your supervisor, however with the information you have thus far provided, rambo79's response was correct.
bandit650
Posts: 880
Joined: 14 Aug 2007, 15:42
Gender: Female

Re: Sacked for not risking my life

Post by bandit650 »

Your right about letting some one know but if they are anything like our managers you would be lucky to find one to let know but i also think that it was very unkind of you to say i bet you have a penalty on your records,he/she might but that should not be used against a member of staff when in trouble,we all know they take it all in but don't you think they have enough to worry over!if a manager is worth anything then they will just give them as ticking off and forget about it.
stokes11eg
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3077
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 12:51
Gender: Female

Re: Sacked for not risking my life

Post by stokes11eg »

:sad:
if you have to take insulin daily at about the same time, surely you Manager should be aware of this fact---? cannot see how
he can penalise you for this.how are things coming along by the way? Is he still trying to get rid of you?
number one
Posts: 1324
Joined: 19 Aug 2009, 21:20
Gender: Male

Re: Sacked for not risking my life

Post by number one »

rambo79 wrote:If you left your point of duty without permission the line manager is within their rights to challenge u and if they deem it necessary award a conduct penalty, your diabetes is a secondary factor, the point is u took it upon yourself just to leave your place of work. If i was your line manager I would succesfully argue that the fact that u have this condition and left the floor without informing someone put u at greater risk, what If u had collapsed? Managers have a duty of care and u would lose any appeal. And I'd stake my life u already have a penalty on your record!
so does this mean you have to put your hand up and ask to go to the toilet!!!
Last edited by TrueBlueTerrier on 30 Mar 2010, 17:48, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: Poster please be polite and debate the issues not the poster you are replying to.
rambo79
Posts: 7
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 22:07
Gender: Female

Re: Sacked for not risking my life

Post by rambo79 »

U don't need to put your hand up but u must inform your line manager when u wish to leave the floor and anyone who tells u differently is incorrect. Under the h & s at work act Your employer has a 'duty of care' to look after, as far as possible, your health, safety and welfare while you are at work.

Many a conduct penalty had been awarded for failure to inform if u r leaving the floor. Do so at your own peril!
stokes11eg
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3077
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 12:51
Gender: Female

Re: Sacked for not risking my life

Post by stokes11eg »

:crazy: Yes, but if no Manager is around, (and in my office the only time you don't see them is when you need them!)
and if it's a difference between taking insulin to prevent a hypo or wasting time looking for someone to excuse you, then act first, ask questions later. I know my mum, who I look after can slip from being O'k into hypo within seconds.
number one
Posts: 1324
Joined: 19 Aug 2009, 21:20
Gender: Male

Re: Sacked for not risking my life

Post by number one »

rambo79 wrote:U don't need to put your hand up but u must inform your line manager when u wish to leave the floor and anyone who tells u differently is incorrect. Under the h & s at work act Your employer has a 'duty of care' to look after, as far as possible, your health, safety and welfare while you are at work.

Many a conduct penalty had been awarded for failure to inform if u r leaving the floor. Do so at your own peril!
haha try and conduct code my for leaving to goto the loo if you dare!! I would tie you in so many knots it really wouldn't be worth it!!
rambo79
Posts: 7
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 22:07
Gender: Female

Re: Sacked for not risking my life

Post by rambo79 »

As I said, do so if u wish, many many conduct penalties are awarded for leaving without informing your manager. Ultimatley all u will do is get yourself dismissed, ask any CWU rep that knows their stuff and they'll tell u the same thing.
rambo79
Posts: 7
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 22:07
Gender: Female

Re: Sacked for not risking my life

Post by rambo79 »

bandit650 wrote:Your right about letting some one know but if they are anything like our managers you would be lucky to find one to let know but i also think that it was very unkind of you to say i bet you have a penalty on your records,he/she might but that should not be used against a member of staff when in trouble,we all know they take it all in but don't you think they have enough to worry over!if a manager is worth anything then they will just give them as ticking off and forget about it.

Sorry, what I meant by hving a previous penalty was that it would be far to severe to be dismissed simply fr leaving the floor once without telling someone. As usual it's probably half of the story.
numan
Posts: 208
Joined: 27 Sep 2007, 23:34
Gender: Male

Re: Sacked for not risking my life

Post by numan »

rambo79 wrote:If you left your point of duty without permission the line manager is within their rights to challenge u and if they deem it necessary award a conduct penalty, your diabetes is a secondary factor, the point is u took it upon yourself just to leave your place of work. If i was your line manager I would succesfully argue that the fact that u have this condition and left the floor without informing someone put u at greater risk, what If u had collapsed? Managers have a duty of care and u would lose any appeal. And I'd stake my life u already have a penalty on your record!


If RM management were adhering to their responsibilities in the first place, they would be aware that diabetes is covered by DDA and therefore reasonable adjustments should be made for any employee diagnosed with the condition. These adjustments would undoubtedly include time allowed for extra breaks when required for insulin injections. Reprimanding such an employee for not asking permission would be taken an extremely dim view of if the case ever got to an ET, especially as them vacating their duty would be highly unlikely to put other workers at risk.
This is typical of the obtuse attitude of many RM managers, their distinct lack of understanding of Employment Law (many of them don't know it even exists) and their woeful ineptitude at performing their job.
rambo79
Posts: 7
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 22:07
Gender: Female

Re: Sacked for not risking my life

Post by rambo79 »

numan wrote:
rambo79 wrote:If you left your point of duty without permission the line manager is within their rights to challenge u and if they deem it necessary award a conduct penalty, your diabetes is a secondary factor, the point is u took it upon yourself just to leave your place of work. If i was your line manager I would succesfully argue that the fact that u have this condition and left the floor without informing someone put u at greater risk, what If u had collapsed? Managers have a duty of care and u would lose any appeal. And I'd stake my life u already have a penalty on your record!
If RM management were adhering to their responsibilities in the first place, they would be aware that diabetes is covered by DDA and therefore reasonable adjustments should be made for any employee diagnosed with the condition. These adjustments would undoubtedly include time allowed for extra breaks when required for insulin injections. Reprimanding such an employee for not asking permission would be viewed in a very dim light if the case ever got to an ET, especially as them vacating their duty would be highly unlikely to put other workers at risk.
This is typical of the obtuse attitude of many RM managers, their distinct lack of understanding of Employment Law (many of them don't know it even exists) and their woeful ineptitude at performing their job.







This condition may be covered under the dda and I'm sure everyone knows that reasonable adjustments hve to be made (state the obvious!) but what is unreasonable is to leave your work area without informing your manager. Individuals with this condition follow the same rules and regulations as everyone else.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72773
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Sacked for not risking my life

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

gone wrote:Can royal mail sack sum one on the grounds of abandonment of duty cos they had to leave the floor to take an insulin injection for diabetes?? And is the union going to stand by and let this happen without a fight??... We need help in our office as the union reps r best friends with the Dom n go drinking with him, n don't want to upset him, so we the union members suffer
rambo79 wrote:This condition may be covered under the dda and I'm sure everyone knows that reasonable adjustments hve to be made (state the obvious!) but what is unreasonable is to leave your work area without informing your manager. Individuals with this condition follow the same rules and regulations as everyone else.
Just a couple of things to add to this debate.

1. If a worker had to take insulin on a regular basis, as both by brother and father do, then they are taken at the same time every day. The reasonable adjustment would be for the employee to take time away from the floor at the same time every day/shift. If so then there is no need to request they leave the floor as the Manager would already know about the condition and the adjustments.

2. If their diabetes was controllable through diet but they carried insulin for emergencies then leaving the floor because of an onset of symptoms to take the insulin would IMO be acceptable as long as the individual informed someone as they left the floor. Even if they did not then as long as the business has been informed of the condition a reasonable person would allow someone to leave if they were preventing a possible medical emergency arising from their condition.

Of course this does impose 1 absolute responsibility on the employee - If you have a medical condition that may affect your employment. TELL YOUR EMPLOYER.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
numan
Posts: 208
Joined: 27 Sep 2007, 23:34
Gender: Male

Re: Sacked for not risking my life

Post by numan »

rambo79 wrote:[This condition may be covered under the dda and I'm sure everyone knows that reasonable adjustments hve to be made (state the obvious!) but what is unreasonable is to leave your work area without informing your manager. Individuals with this condition follow the same rules and regulations as everyone else.


That last sentence would be laughable, except as it's from somebody supposedly in a position of responsibility it is actually deplorable. The whole point of DDA is that individuals with disabilities are not bound by the exact same rules as everybody else. As long as the employee didn't openly abuse the situation they would be excused without having to inform a manager every single time. In any case, it wouldn't be too difficult to prove that in most offices workers are allowed to go to the toilet (within reason) without informing their managers. Most people would agree that injecting insulin is more important than going for a piss, end of case. It is no wonder that RM have such a notorious reputation and poor record at ETs with these flagrant displays of disregard for DDA.