As a Londoner i will NOT vote yes just because i have my 4 day week back,i am unaware of any Londoner voting yes because of this.
There are not many of us if any who trust RM.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
London`s Position
-
POSTMAN
- SITE ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 32819
- Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
- Gender: Male
Re: London`s Position
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
-
belle smith
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 17:41
- Gender: Male
- Location: scotland
Re: London`s Position
apart from anything else i was under the impression that it was a minority of London offices that had 4 day weeks....anyway i don't dispute that you's are entiteld to them back, they were introduced under 2007 agreement and were removed under EA in breech of an agreement.POSTMAN wrote:As a Londoner i will NOT vote yes just because i have my 4 day week back,i am unaware of any Londoner voting yes because of this.
There are not many of us if any who trust RM.
-
POSTMAN
- SITE ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 32819
- Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
- Gender: Male
Re: London`s Position
Yep,dingo will have the figures,weren't many of us.belle smith wrote:apart from anything else i was under the impression that it was a minority of London offices that had 4 day weeks....anyway i don't dispute that you's are entiteld to them back, they were introduced under 2007 agreement and were removed under EA in breech of an agreement.POSTMAN wrote:As a Londoner i will NOT vote yes just because i have my 4 day week back,i am unaware of any Londoner voting yes because of this.
There are not many of us if any who trust RM.
Not happy with the anti London posts though.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
-
headscrewedon
- Posts: 290
- Joined: 30 Sep 2009, 20:40
- Gender: Female
Re: London`s Position
Ahhhhh.... now I see it ! Well done gb93, you've rumbled Dave & Billy's inspired-by-Balrick "cunning plan"gb93 wrote:OK then Big Daz i will just have to trust lovejoy that he will explain it fully as best he can without spin before the ballot closes.
If it ever opens this side of xmas
The union have played a blinder here. They let RM think that the CWU have agreed all those things on RM's pre-November wishlist, then never ever actually have the ballot of the membership. The deal never gets ratified, and Royal Mail can't resort to Executive Action because to do so would incur the wrath of the mighty Roger Poole.
NICE ONE !
-
belle smith
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 17:41
- Gender: Male
- Location: scotland
Re: London`s Position
It was me who commented on the 4 day weeks as a responce to dingos post, but anti London???POSTMAN wrote:Yep,dingo will have the figures,weren't many of us.belle smith wrote:apart from anything else i was under the impression that it was a minority of London offices that had 4 day weeks....anyway i don't dispute that you's are entiteld to them back, they were introduced under 2007 agreement and were removed under EA in breech of an agreement.POSTMAN wrote:As a Londoner i will NOT vote yes just because i have my 4 day week back,i am unaware of any Londoner voting yes because of this.
There are not many of us if any who trust RM.
Not happy with the anti London posts though.
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: London`s Position
POSTMAN wrote:
Not happy with the anti London posts though.
Not anti-London posts POSTMAN,anti management.
I believe management are taking us all for mugs and that's why they have stalled on the 4 day weeks.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
belle smith
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 17:41
- Gender: Male
- Location: scotland
Re: London`s Position
Postman the reason we are commenting on this is......it appears that it will have a significant bearing on how London branches will advise their members to vote.POSTMAN wrote:As a Londoner i will NOT vote yes just because i have my 4 day week back,i am unaware of any Londoner voting yes because of this.
There are not many of us if any who trust RM.