ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!
-
realmichael
- Posts: 151
- Joined: 21 Feb 2010, 13:11
- Gender: Male
- Location: between a rock and a hard place
Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!
Just as the savage must wrestle with Nature to satisfy his wants, to maintain and reproduce life, so must civilised man, and he must do so in all social formations and under all possible modes of production. With his development this realm of physical necessity expands as a result of his wants; but, at the same time, the forces of production which satisfy these wants also increase. Freedom in this field can only consist in socialised man, the associated producers, rationally regulating their interchange with Nature, bringing it under their common control, instead of being ruled by it as by the blind forces of Nature; and achieving this with the least expenditure of energy and under conditions most favourable to, and worthy of, their human nature. But it nonetheless still remains a realm of necessity. Beyond it begins that development of human energy which is an end in itself, the true realm of freedom, which, however, can blossom forth only with this realm of necessity as its basis. The shortening of the working-day is its basic prerequisite. 
"Workers of the world unite; you have nothing to lose but your chains."
"Without doubt, machinery has greatly increased the number of well-to-do idlers."
"An ounce of action is worth a ton of theory"
"Without doubt, machinery has greatly increased the number of well-to-do idlers."
"An ounce of action is worth a ton of theory"
-
delighted
- Posts: 36
- Joined: 19 Mar 2010, 16:36
- Gender: Male
- Location: sunny lancaster
Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!
The present system means joyless drudgery,semi-starvation,rags and premature death;and they vote for it and uphold it.Let them have what they vote for!Let them drudge and let them starve!! 
-
Big Daz
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
- Gender: Male
Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!
bexhil palace wrote:I believe the South East branches have a meeting in London this coming friday.
Should be very interesting to say the least
And the Eastern region
-
cantbelieveit's...
- Posts: 136
- Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 17:23
- Gender: Male
Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!
South East Wales Amal have recommended a NO vote

-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!
cantbelieveit's... wrote:South East Wales Amal have recommended a NO vote
![]()
![]()
![]()
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
mcboing boing
- Posts: 66
- Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 11:57
- Gender: Male
Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!
cantbelieveit's... wrote:South East Wales Amal have recommended a NO vote
![]()
![]()
![]()
-
Stammerking
- Posts: 208
- Joined: 09 Dec 2007, 20:58
-
lovejoy
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59
Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!
Same as they did in 2007 and their members voted YES overwhemingly!cantbelieveit's... wrote:South East Wales Amal have recommended a NO vote
![]()
![]()
![]()
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!
lovejoy wrote:Same as they did in 2007 and their members voted YES overwhemingly!cantbelieveit's... wrote:South East Wales Amal have recommended a NO vote
![]()
![]()
![]()
Well.....I would imagine since their recommendation was spot on in 2007 their members may pay more attention to them this time.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share