ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

17/07/07

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
frankie

Post by frankie »

WTL session today: 1) Harry Potter..yawn!!!!! 2) Dum thanked strikers for behaving on picket line ( patronising tw*t, as if we give a sh*t what he thinks) 3) not allowed to blank the strike breakers...don't hold your breath too long on that one, dumb(not a spelling error).4) mentioned how much bonus he received, ( after we asked) £1,500. Obviously not a very good Dom, according to a notice doing the rounds, doms in line for £3,000-£4,000.... :funneh oops, methinks he must have dropped a b****ck! :Very Happy :dance :Very Happy :dance
edwarddaffin
Posts: 18
Joined: 10 Jul 2007, 16:43
Location: Tewkesbury

Post by edwarddaffin »

frankie wrote:WTL session today: 1) Harry Potter..yawn!!!!! 2) Dum thanked strikers for behaving on picket line ( patronising tw*t, as if we give a sh*t what he thinks) 3) not allowed to blank the strike breakers...don't hold your breath too long on that one, dumb(not a spelling error).4) mentioned how much bonus he received, ( after we asked) £1,500. Obviously not a very good Dom, according to a notice doing the rounds, doms in line for £3,000-£4,000.... :funneh oops, methinks he must have dropped a b****ck! :Very Happy :dance :Very Happy :dance
I think you should be in our WTL&L you ask the right Qs :Applause
Carnoustie
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 793
Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 22:00

Post by Carnoustie »

Think about it seriously. How can you PROVE that someone harrassed someone else by not talking to them ? I'd like to see a test case... Getting someone who overhears a racist, sexist or threatening remark to act as a witness is one thing, but just how ridiculous a concept is asking someone to testify that they heard somebody not saying anything :crazy:

If any manager warns about this in my next WTLL session, I'd have to say something like

So, when I sign in tomorrow, you'll have no problem with me taking about 20 minutes to seek out each and every one of my 79 colleagues and saying 'hello'? Because, as I see it, that is the only way I can see of avoiding any misunderstandings building up about me supposedly ignoring someone and thus sparking an allegation of harrassment. Of course, if every one of us has to do the same thing, for the very same reason, that's 26 hours of productivity lost. You'd best build-in another three full-time duties to your budget to cover the hours, or put me down for a bit of docket this weekend, cause money's a bit tight at the moment. Can't think why ....
cappamore
Posts: 40
Joined: 01 Jun 2007, 08:57

Re: 17/07/07

Post by cappamore »

iow1 wrote:
edwarddaffin wrote:Did any of the unions reps on this site feel intimidated by their manager in this mornings WTL&L session?
our rep had to make a rare appearance at wtl today. screw has said we can not talk about the strikes at all in our office!!! not past or present. if he hears about bitching or if we choose not to talk to the strike breakers then it will be harrasment and we will be taken down the conduct code and sacked.
our rep looked totally hacked off. i was expecting her to tell him to feck off.
Harrassment is unwanted attention. if you choose not to talk to a scab then you're not paying them any attention, are you? Ergo it's not harrassment.
Carnoustie
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 793
Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 22:00

Re: 17/07/07

Post by Carnoustie »

cappamore wrote:
iow1 wrote:
edwarddaffin wrote:Did any of the unions reps on this site feel intimidated by their manager in this mornings WTL&L session?
our rep had to make a rare appearance at wtl today. screw has said we can not talk about the strikes at all in our office!!! not past or present. if he hears about bitching or if we choose not to talk to the strike breakers then it will be harrasment and we will be taken down the conduct code and sacked.
our rep looked totally hacked off. i was expecting her to tell him to feck off.
Harrassment is unwanted attention. if you choose not to talk to a scab then you're not paying them any attention, are you? Ergo it's not harrassment.
BRILLIANT !
cruisey
Posts: 389
Joined: 24 May 2007, 20:11
Location: BIRMINGHAM

Post by cruisey »

Being a rep in the current climate can be a pain. Banned from briefing on site etc. My DUM is looking for any excuse to conduct me. What reps have to do is play it by the book and wait for the golden opportunity where the DUM/LM breach RM standards. Believe me it will happen sometime.
To brief the members I've got to do newsletters for them all. It's the only way.
Roll on the next strike :Applause