ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Reasons to vote yes!

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
LouBarlow
Posts: 4666
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56

Re: Reasons to vote yes!

Post by LouBarlow »

smokerjim wrote:As a 35hr man, and the PT with greatest seniority in my DO, my rep & assistant rep has said I've got the most to gain, as I'd probably get a hallowed FT contract ( that has been my Holy Grail - FT & Permanant )
No chance. They were just selling the agreement to you. RM will not take on any more full-timers.

The only reason I can see for voting YES is if you want an extra weeks pay (i.e. the first lump sum payment) and don't give a damn about the future.
traww
Posts: 69
Joined: 24 Feb 2008, 10:43

Re: Reasons to vote yes!

Post by traww »

Reasons to vote yes?

erm none!
Please sir can I have more?
Stormproof
Posts: 6116
Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
Gender: Female

Re: Reasons to vote yes!

Post by Stormproof »

What a load of rubbish! :cuppa
So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets


Illegitimi non carborundum
donut
Posts: 351
Joined: 16 Sep 2007, 09:55

Re: Reasons to vote yes!

Post by donut »

Ricky Bruch wrote:Was considering this very thing this morning.

Conclusion was to vote yes on the basis that I truly feel our gallant bullies will not offer us a single penny more whether we strike or not.

Because of the time taken to reach this agreement I very much doubt there would be as many willing to walk out & strike again & if it was a poor showing this would play into the hands of our gallant masters who may even reduce their current offers.

To strike would lead to a public backlash thanks to those wonderful weasels in the media painting such an unbiased wonderful picture of this massive bonus & pay rise we are to receive.

We take it on the chin, do the job as they now want us to do & then sit back & watch it go tits up because they will be greedy as always & cut hours in the offices too far back, the machines will not be as marvellous as predicted, they will get money hungry with over subscriptions to D2D`s & leave themselves wide open to mass cut off`s because there will not be enough Royal Mail hours in the day to do the job correctly.

Play them at their own game for once & stop with the knee jerk reactions we normally resort to, once the public become aware of the systematic failures happening because all this modernisation was not needed & just a typical Crozier blinkered money in my own pocket venture heads will be called upon to roll both in the company & government.

Loose the battle win the war.

:no no
motherhubbard
Posts: 1001
Joined: 08 Feb 2010, 17:13
Gender: Female
Location: in the cupboard

Re: Reasons to vote yes!

Post by motherhubbard »

Ricky Bruch wrote:Was considering this very thing this morning.

Conclusion was to vote yes on the basis that I truly feel our gallant bullies will not offer us a single penny more whether we strike or not.

Because of the time taken to reach this agreement I very much doubt there would be as many willing to walk out & strike again & if it was a poor showing this would play into the hands of our gallant masters who may even reduce their current offers.

To strike would lead to a public backlash thanks to those wonderful weasels in the media painting such an unbiased wonderful picture of this massive bonus & pay rise we are to receive.

We take it on the chin, do the job as they now want us to do & then sit back & watch it go tits up because they will be greedy as always & cut hours in the offices too far back, the machines will not be as marvellous as predicted, they will get money hungry with over subscriptions to D2D`s & leave themselves wide open to mass cut off`s because there will not be enough Royal Mail hours in the day to do the job correctly.

Play them at their own game for once & stop with the knee jerk reactions we normally resort to, once the public become aware of the systematic failures happening because all this modernisation was not needed & just a typical Crozier blinkered money in my own pocket venture heads will be called upon to roll both in the company & government.

Loose the battle win the war.
I think he is right and I will vote yes as well.
D2D into workload is a good thing and it will help weaker offices who have to prep their D2D in their own time.
Banning private cars and taking weight off our backs is also a good thing.
I don't think there will be another strike.
If it goes "tits up" as he says it will be their fault.
I won't be leaving the union.
Never let the hand you hold, hold you down.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32640
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Reasons to vote yes!

Post by POSTMAN »

Thank you for your 'yes' comments,please keep them coming.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
Funked!
Posts: 184
Joined: 08 Oct 2007, 18:35

Re: Reasons to vote yes!

Post by Funked! »

I have voted NO in the poll.

I can imagine some in the office i work in (Drivers, Firm deliveries) thinking they will be better off as they will receive the £20.60p. BUT, they are basing their thinking on 'no change to their duties', if there is one thing we all must realize they will & do change.
johnnyp
Posts: 5239
Joined: 27 Jan 2007, 16:00
Gender: Male
Location: SE ENGLAND

Re: Reasons to vote yes!

Post by johnnyp »

I thought this Thread was about peple who will vote yes :whistle
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Reasons to vote yes!

Post by dvbuk55 »

Funked! wrote:I have voted NO in the poll.

I can imagine some in the office i work in (Drivers, Firm deliveries) thinking they will be better off as they will receive the £20.60p. BUT, they are basing their thinking on 'no change to their duties', if there is one thing we all must realize they will & do change.
Absolutely. The first 200 quid is based "on the roll out of non-sequenced revision" which will include the park and loop - and believe me the first thing that disappears is the firms deliveries - they are done by the park and loop driver. Tee Hee.

Oh and I will consider voting yes just to be different ;liar
Just_My_Opinion
Posts: 139
Joined: 10 Mar 2010, 16:23
Gender: Female

Re: Reasons to vote yes!

Post by Just_My_Opinion »

Vote yes? Vote no? Don't vote at all?

Does it really matter?

Royal Mail own us and have now shown that the CWU does not have any power whatsoever to influence Royal Mail.

What Royal Mail wants it will have. In November Royal Mail wanted a halt to the strikes so there was no disruption at Christmas and they got it. In March they probably would of wanted a deal where the workers in essence will be getting a pay cut and working harder and they've got it.

The Union are just brushed to the side. Useless, ineffective, incapable and irrelevant.

We the workers now have to learn to work as Royal Mail want us to cause the Union can do absolutely nothing about it.

This agreement has proved this.

So as I say, vote yes, vote no or don't vote at all. It'll be the same result one way or another.
Last edited by Just_My_Opinion on 11 Mar 2010, 16:35, edited 1 time in total.
flaminmoses
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 819
Joined: 05 Jul 2009, 14:17
Gender: Male

Re: Reasons to vote yes!

Post by flaminmoses »

gotta vote no.
royal mail must be laughing at us right now.
we can get more on the door to door deal if we stick together.
thats daylight robbery for starters

keeping saturadys a family friendly day is a must as well.


oh and no strikes!!!!!

they can f**k right off
opgpat
Posts: 878
Joined: 08 Oct 2007, 21:56

Re: Reasons to vote yes!

Post by opgpat »

I'll vote Yes then, that makes 3 so far, what a great deal this must be. :crazy:

If we vote NO the press will have a major head-scratch and at that point they will have to do some research instead of re-printing CWU/RM media briefs. The truth will come out with a NO vote, it will be the onlty way to explain the result. Why would we say NO to '2 1/2 grand and 40quid a week more pay'?!?!? :hmmmm :hmmmm :hmmmm
ziggy
Posts: 114
Joined: 10 Jul 2007, 14:26
Gender: Male
Location: Back o Beyond

Re: Reasons to vote yes!

Post by ziggy »

I`ll be voting no. . . but I think the overall vote will be yes :cry I don`t want to be blinkered to that possibility .

There are lots of people who do stand to gain a decent pay rise from this and most of them will vote yes .
Then there`s those who will be swayed by the not so lumpy lump sums who will vote yes
Lastly there will be people concerned about the implications of a no vote , i.e strikes , I think they will vote yes as well .

So if this does all go through, the only defence left for me is to do the job exactly as RM dictate and hope that their badly thought out work plans and future greed for taking on more and more D2D will give them enough rope to hang themselves with .
Ziggy
slave
Posts: 433
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 21:39
Location: North West

Re: Reasons to vote yes!

Post by slave »

I'm still undecided, my initial reaction was rubbish deal, vote no. Having had time to sit back and think about it rationally I will say the following:

Longer Saturdays; not good, but as I've said elsewhere, for me this day was ruined long ago (when SDD was brought in!) so I finish at ~11am now, then perhaps another 2 hours later at 1pm is not a "major" difference. Be thankful you don't work in a supermarket where you could end up working all day Saturday!

D2D/shift payment; again not good but lets face it, this one has been coming for a very long time! I keep reading about 10xD2D - do poeple really believe they will get this amount every week? I don't often get 3 lots, I have less than 500 houses so whilst I might lose out it's not as much as some perhaps.
In theory the potential extra workload should be accounted for, we all know RM - if they fail to deliver then we do as per RM's insistance - work the hours we're paid to do - no more, no less!!! Let them hang themselves.

Bonuses; most due to us anyway, in particular the "shares payments". The other split £1000 (200, 600, 200) I wasn't expecting so this to me is extra, not much but better than nowt and some of the conditions I'm sure we've already met in our office anyway?

Workload; The union were well aware of issues surrounding workload, christ it was even on the TV with that marine chappy!If they have failed to agree on workloads this time then I feel they are incapable of doing so again if we vote no. The only thing we can do is do the job properly, don't take the piss and there's nothing to worry about, let them go overboard trying to pin s**t on you.
1 hour less a week (forgot to add that initially!) - not sure how that will be factored in to things but, 1 hour less for the same basic pay is good for me!

Pay increase; 2%, not earth shattering, not nothing, I'm satisfied with it. Admnittedly next years seems low and the 3% or whatever the year after is open to change (which it will be) - but why oh why are we negotiating something so far in advance anyway? How many other companies look at pay-deals a few years ahead?

I've already commented on what would happen with a no vote elsewhere - but to reiterate the possible outcomes;
  • They could get back round the table, do any of you believe that would happen? Do you honestly believe that if it did happen that the union would be capable of negotiating a deal you were happy with?? I don't have any faith left in them.
  • We could continue with our current agreement, which as we all know is rubbish anyway and it's what got us in this mess.
  • We go back out on strike long term, with less public support (how many fools have read and believed we are getting a superb deal that we are rejecting because we're greedy??), there would be less union support/more strike-breakers as some people are tired of fighting for it to be thrown away as it was last time. How much money have YOU lost to get this deal, how much more would YOU lose to get a better deal?
There, said my piece, still undecided, swaying heavily towards yes at the moment. When some further details emerge I will consider my choice again.

Some basic info about me; I'm a delivery man, been in the job ~15 years, have always gone out on strike and supported the union, never once crossed a picket-line. These days I have more commitments and going on strike is financially crippling (it was very hard at the end of 2009 with only minor strike action that we undertook) - would I go on strike this year if we reject the deal, regretably it might be a no. I threw away good money to support the union and in return I get this deal, I have no desire to throw away even more money making my life f***ing difficult just to get a revised deal (and revised is all it might be, there would be no new deal, just amendmants of the one that's on offer now, anyone that thinks RM will bow down and give you £40+/week for no D2D payements and £1000s in bonuses is quite frankly, deluded.)
Last edited by slave on 11 Mar 2010, 16:55, edited 1 time in total.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16383
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Reasons to vote yes!

Post by clashcityrocker »

I am as yet undecided but I do think D2D into workload is good for us. Unfortunately if you accept D2D into workload there is no longer a rationale to the separate payments.
So does the benefit of D2D into workload outweigh the disadvantage of losing money? I think it probably does.
The other really contentious issue is the longer Saturday. But will voting NO change the model for the business that RM (not the CWU) want to adopt? I don't think so.
"I'm voting NO because I've got a season ticket to the football" doesn't really make any sense unless you really believe RM will change the business plan.
I believe the PEC was divided in 2007 yet this time they have overwhelmingly (unanimously?) endorsed the deal.That tells me something and I don't subscribe to the view that they are all corrupt,stupid and out of touch.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.