shimmyrule wrote:fishtank wrote:shimmyrule wrote
“The incident was entirely Mr Kennedy’s fault as he refused to respond to polite and formal requests to leave of his own accord,” the BNP Media Unit statement said.
The clue is in the first line shimmyrule "the BNP Media Unit statement said"
Fascists know a bit about propaganda.
Was it published in the Völkischer Beobachter .
where else do expect a first hand account of what happened ? The fookin Sun NEWSPAPER
He was asked to leave-repeatedly, he never, he went- forcibly, just as you or i would if we were asked to leave a nightclub, or move if required by the police at a demo, sensationalist gutterpress journalism, some of you really should know better
Sensationalist gutterpress journalism shimmyrule?
He works for the Times.
His account is obvously slightly different.
Kennedy detailed his version of events in a front page article for his newspaper: "Although I had been invited, one prominent BNP politician had taken exception to an article in Saturday's edition of the Times. After he lost his temper with me I was quickly shoved and lifted out of the building, hit in the back and had my face squashed.
And i think the pictures back him up.
He was not in a nightclub he was in his place of work where he had been invited.
If the BNP had an issue they could have called the police and had him removed but Nick had a point to prove didn't he?
In an email Griffin told members the rule change was not an indication that the party was "going soft". He added: "That we're not going soft was shown to millions of viewers who will have seen the report of us ejecting a lying Times journalist from the press conference," he said.
"That's not the actions of a snivelling PC party, but of an organisation that has had enough of being lied about."
