ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

appealls

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
La Poste
Posts: 369
Joined: 21 Sep 2009, 12:46
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere or other.

Re: appealls

Post by La Poste »

Jimmy Carr`s laugh wrote:also bear in mind its managers from other offices who do them , usually DOMs I think,
Not necessarily, RM has a few dedicated appeal managers. If Sharon knew the appeal managers name someone who she is friendly with at work could find out through RM people finder if this manager only does appeals.
She should also have the managers name and contact details on her appeal bundle of papers that she received before the appeal. She could phone the appeal manager direct to find out what position they hold.
No I'm not being paranoid, they really are out to get me.
patrickstar
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 133
Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 07:30

Re: appealls

Post by patrickstar »

i have a dedicated appeals manager,that is all she does but it is still taking the 90 days allowed!!!
please dont be in any rush and be patient that is what i am being told
La Poste
Posts: 369
Joined: 21 Sep 2009, 12:46
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere or other.

Re: appealls

Post by La Poste »

patrickstar wrote:i have a dedicated appeals manager,that is all she does but it is still taking the 90 days allowed!!!
please dont be in any rush and be patient that is what i am being told
OK. I didn't realise there was a 90 day limit, thanks for that mate.
Funny how the 90 day time limit at RM coincides with a 90 day time limit for filing an ET claim.
Coincidence maybe?
No I'm not being paranoid, they really are out to get me.
patrickstar
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 133
Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 07:30

Re: appealls

Post by patrickstar »

definately no coincidence!!

A postitive return from the ET on an acceptence always gently reminds the appeals manager that we mean business!!
La Poste
Posts: 369
Joined: 21 Sep 2009, 12:46
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere or other.

Re: appealls

Post by La Poste »

patrickstar wrote:A postitive return from the ET on an acceptence always gently reminds the appeals manager that we mean business!!
That's exactly the advice the union gives.
No I'm not being paranoid, they really are out to get me.
hantsman
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 876
Joined: 14 Jul 2009, 09:33
Gender: Male

Re: appealls

Post by hantsman »

patrickstar wrote:my appeal was heard in early november 2009 and i still havnt heard my outcome!!!
tribunal locked and ready to go,just in case!!!
Can I ask if you are still being paid?
fmrPOSTIE
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 674
Joined: 29 Oct 2008, 20:52
Gender: Male

Re: appealls

Post by fmrPOSTIE »

Of course she is not being paid!!!! She's been sacked for god sake.
hantsman
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 876
Joined: 14 Jul 2009, 09:33
Gender: Male

Re: appealls

Post by hantsman »

fmrPOSTIE wrote:Of course she is not being paid!!!! She's been sacked for god sake.


Suggest you put your reading glasses on!
La Poste
Posts: 369
Joined: 21 Sep 2009, 12:46
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere or other.

Re: appealls

Post by La Poste »

hantsman wrote:Suggest you put your reading glasses on!
Why?
What fact has he missed?
No I'm not being paranoid, they really are out to get me.
La Poste
Posts: 369
Joined: 21 Sep 2009, 12:46
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere or other.

Re: appealls

Post by La Poste »

La Poste wrote:
hantsman wrote:Suggest you put your reading glasses on!
Why?
What fact has he missed?
Jimmy Carr`s laugh wrote: He was asking if he (patrickstar) was still being paid :d'oh!
That will be the fact I was missing then. :d'oh!
No I'm not being paranoid, they really are out to get me.
hantsman
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 876
Joined: 14 Jul 2009, 09:33
Gender: Male

Re: appealls

Post by hantsman »

La Poste wrote:
La Poste wrote:
hantsman wrote:Suggest you put your reading glasses on!
Why?
What fact has he missed?
Jimmy Carr`s laugh wrote: He was asking if he (patrickstar) was still being paid :d'oh!
That will be the fact I was missing then. :d'oh!
No worries La Poste :wink: as you know I like the facts or as near to them as I can get.

If patrickstar is being paid and no dis-respect to him then RM managers should be taken to task for not sorting appeals out quickly. I cant believe its 90 days maxium for an appeal.
365+ :shock:
patrickstar
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 133
Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 07:30

Re: appealls

Post by patrickstar »

hi guys
sorry for not getting back to you.I cannot go into too much detail because obviously i am subject to confidentiality.I was just transferred from my office to another but am awaiting my appeal.My case was complicated by the fact there is more than one person involved .That said i am still waiting and tomorrow will be 90 days since i had my appeal heard
sharonbar
Posts: 142
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 14:39
Gender: Female

Re: appealls

Post by sharonbar »

hi patric star well i see you have joined my discussion you must still be at work if your in another office where as im dismissed an im still waiting on my answer so i do think there is a difference between you and i as you are working but hopefully we shall both get answers soon we hope good luck any way
sharonbar
Posts: 142
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 14:39
Gender: Female

Re: appealls

Post by sharonbar »

still waiting folks totally givin up on the idea now :wave
hantsman
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 876
Joined: 14 Jul 2009, 09:33
Gender: Male

Re: appealls

Post by hantsman »

sharonbar wrote:still waiting folks totally givin up on the idea now :wave

Sometimes thats what I think RM want sharon, dont give up!