LTB 1069/09 - David Cameron - Reducing the burden and impact of health and safety [The Tory Threat]
To view this download, please click here
No. 1069/09
Ref EX10
Date: 7 December 2009
To: All Branches
Dear Colleagues
David Cameron - Reducing the burden and impact of health and safety [The Tory Threat]
Tory Leader David Cameron has delivered a speech attacking Health and Safety at Work in which he said there were too many regulations and a volume of bureaucratic gold plated rules imported from Brussels in what he called the UK's over-the-top health and safety culture. One in a long line of similar Tory speeches over recent years, he and the Tory Party want to sweep away health and safety laws and regulations at every opportunity, bringing back common sense, discretion and personal responsibility so he says!
Cameron's latest speech gives a real insight into the Conservatives health and safety thinking. There is no coherent strategy and no developed proposals.
Kenneth Clark's proposals, announced at the Tory Conference in October, to allow companies to self-regulate and opt-out of HSE Inspection, simply by obtaining an independent audit, is not mentioned after the recent condemnation the idea received by the Chair of the HSE.
The speech seems to consist of little more than a medley of already discredited Daily Mail 'bonkers-conkers' type headlines and has very little substance or accuracy.
Cameron's advisers and speech writers are clearly out of touch. He says there is too much health and safety regulation. In fact there were more than twice as many health and safety regulations and laws 35 years ago than there are now and today's safety laws are simpler and easier to understand.
Cameron and a Tory Government would seem happy to perpetuate a UK safety culture which is dangerously dysfunctional, blighted by under-resourced regulators with a fainthearted enforcement policy and where workers are actively discouraged from raising safety concerns. A system that gives a nod and a wink to employers that can put workers at risk with virtual impunity.
The speech also faces both ways! On closer reading, there is an acceptance from Cameron that the health and safety regime is overall both robust and effective! and ironically he even praises trade unions!, saying "trade unions remain a bulwark against most abuse happening".
When it comes to the next General Election workers will decide the result and they need to think carefully about the Tory threat to their wellbeing at work. David Cameron has never done a hard days work in his life. Brought up into an illustrious family and with a £30 million fortune in the bank, he lives on a different planet and can never even begin to imagine the types of workplaces in which 250,000 UK workers were injured last year - something he and his Tory colleagues has never, ever mentioned.
Yours Sincerely
Dave Joyce
National Health, Safety and Environment Officer
Attached Find a copy of David Cameron's Speech plus Press Releases from the TUC and STUC
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Cons - Reducing the burden and impact of health and safety
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72618
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Cons - Reducing the burden and impact of health and safety
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
mailman71
- Posts: 500
- Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 08:03
Re: Cons - Reducing the burden and impact of health and safety
heaven help the working class if cameron and his muppets get in.
-
THEPITBULL
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 08 Dec 2009, 15:30
- Gender: Male
Re: Cons - Reducing the burden and impact of health and safety
What a joke.....
Do you not realise that the health and saftey rules are set by LLOYDS OF LONDON ?
Neither the tories or labour have any say in what the HSE do or say and both have to allow the rules that Lloyds of Londin have set. These are made ny the HSC and implemented by the HSE, Just try and remember of you pay insurance you are already payong for the HSE to do the jobs.......
A little note 99.9% of health and safety is common sense.......
THEPITBULL
and yes I used to work for the HSE
Do you not realise that the health and saftey rules are set by LLOYDS OF LONDON ?
Neither the tories or labour have any say in what the HSE do or say and both have to allow the rules that Lloyds of Londin have set. These are made ny the HSC and implemented by the HSE, Just try and remember of you pay insurance you are already payong for the HSE to do the jobs.......
A little note 99.9% of health and safety is common sense.......
THEPITBULL
and yes I used to work for the HSE
-
brothermagrew
- Posts: 3015
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 16:38
- Gender: Male
- Location: Shares a border with England to the south.
Re: Cons - Reducing the burden and impact of health and safety
THEPITBULL wrote:What a joke.....
Do you not realise that the health and saftey rules are set by LLOYDS OF LONDON ?
Neither the tories or labour have any say in what the HSE do or say and both have to allow the rules that Lloyds of Londin have set. These are made ny the HSC and implemented by the HSE, Just try and remember of you pay insurance you are already payong for the HSE to do the jobs.......
A little note 99.9% of health and safety is common sense.......
THEPITBULL
and yes I used to work for the HSE
Do tell, then kindly please explain how someone who claims to have worked for the HSE hasn't yet realised that the HSC & HSE have merged.
1.To improve governance arrangements, the Health and Safety Commission and the current three person Health and Safety Executive have agreed to merge into a new unitary body, bringing together their powers and functions, and retaining the name Health and Safety Executive. In doing so, they are committed to maintaining the current legal position whereby only duly authorised officials make individual enforcement decisions.
"Today’s workplace has become heartless and soulless. Employees are seen as units of labour, automatons, functionaries, objects for achieving designated tasks, and as costs to be minimised."
-
norbert
- Posts: 3027
- Joined: 15 Jan 2008, 01:46
Re: Cons - Reducing the burden and impact of health and safety
back to 80's & 90's "accidents will happen" - if the scaffolding collapses on a building site & someone is hurt , don't call a ambulance as it's traceable , keep your mouth shut or you'll / we'll all get sacked .mailman71 wrote:heaven help the working class if cameron and his muppets get in.
New Labour are a terrible government , all this third way - we are so clever nonsense that has collapsed under the weight of it's own contradictions so there's the " we are c**ts but they are complete tw*** " choice " " and all these turkeys voting for christmas
Strangely enough "Sunny Jim " Callaghan said that about Thatcher years ago .