I stand by what i said...it's still true. There are a lot of post men/women out there who don't want to strike purely for financial reasons, but fear backlash if they were to go to work. I also stand by the fact that there are many post men/ women who believe that revision was a good thing as it spread the workload equally among staff.chunk wrote:Does damcka still stand by this quote!I recently chatted to a number of staff in my local area, and questioned them about their strike action (which is over revision), to which 4 out of 5 said they felt the revison was "the right thing to do", "it had made their delivery easier", but "the CWU didn't agree, so that why we're out".that makes sense.......what the hell sort of business is this?
Your "Phd" obviously wasn't in maths as your 80 percent of happy workers doesn't really tally with the 75 percent that voted to strike.
stop union bashing as Ive read your posts. We are a democracy i'm a worker and the union work for me !
not the other way round.
This might not be the case in other offices, but i can only comment on the offices/ MC's I have be involved with. Thats why i remained philosphical when apportioning blame/ responsibilty.
As for academic qualifications/ expertise.... you were "obviously" wrong in your assumption of what I specialised in. The reason for the disjointed sentences in my last post, was purely down to lack of time/ sleep etc. I didnt realise i was subject to an examination..If its too much to act like an adult here then...........
Working Practices (From my experience, your experience may differ......)
There have been a lot of changes to the business and working practices, and in many ways RM has been slow to catch up with modern ways of working. I dont blame any staff member who finds it difficult to change what has been culturally acceptable to them and the business since time in memorial, but change is what must happen...
eg. Drivers in MC's: Should come in and carry out work to help the operation when not driving or loading/ unloading their vehicle. I can honestly say I have never seen this happen in any MC.
eg 2. Enquiry Office staff should carry out other duties in DO when the enquiry office is not a) Open or, b) busy. Again, never seen this happen.
I could go on....
In a supermarket if a shelf stacker was asked to work in the warehouse or checkout there would be no issue.
On a building site, If a labourer was asked to work with the Roofer, and then next day the plumber. Again, no issue....
In a production line environment, If a member of staff was asked to move to the opposite end of the line. No Issue...
In a distribution environment, if a driver was asked to change his/ her route to help out. No problem!
In an admin environment staff can be moved to a differnet department without any issue.
In retail, if asked to tidy the shop/ store etc. No issue
I cant think of any example (in my time) of this type of behaviour in Royal Mail.
Pay (For the person who mentioned it.)
IMO post men/ women are paid VERY well for the tasks they carry out. The forum member has mentioned pay being "nowhere near the national average wage". The average house in the UK cost 160K, and this is after the US housing crash causing the global recession we currently find ourselves in, who here owns a house worth £160k+, especially the further North one lives.......
RM staff are paid on average 15-20% more than competitors in a similar industries. This is a statistic of whih i'm sure someone will take exception to, but the recruitment websites speak for themselves....
The work carried out by RM staff, is essentially, unskilled. Why should this sort of work be financially rewarded in the same as eg. an accountant, architect, Dr, Nurse, tradesman?
Should UK be made a communist country? should we all be paide the same and not strive for better lives for oursleves and families? Should achievement not be rewarded?
Profits/ Turnover/ Volumes & Competition etc
I believe that an operating profit of 58 million, from a business with such a huge turnover and workforce, isn't the kind of financial golden goose that some think. Competition, the internet and declining traffic in 2009 will wipe out this profit next year, hence the need to adapt, change and move the business forward, not sideways.
and finally....
All of this is my opinion, based on my experiences in mail centres, RDCs, Delivery units. I have not set out to attack anyone in this thread, nor do i intend to. It is also not my intention to be abrasive and cause argument. As i have said, its about my experience, shared with you, from a formerly "outside" perspective.
I fully hope that the CWU and RM reach an agreement that benefits both the business and the staff.
Apologies if my spelling, grammar or command of the english language has offended anyone who read.....