ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Unions 'unlikely' to gain injunctions against BA and Royal

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
Geezer
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1347
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 21:01

Unions 'unlikely' to gain injunctions against BA and Royal

Post by Geezer »

http://www.peoplemanagement.co.uk/pm/ar ... expert.htm


Court orders would be a ‘better weapon’ than strikes

Lucy Phillips

Publication date: 3 November 2009
Source:
PM Online

The High Court is 'unlikely' to grant the orders, 'because of the precedent it would set for public policy'.


Trade unions at British Airways and Royal Mail will probably fail to obtain injunctions preventing planned changes to jobs, an employment lawyer has predicted.

Unite is trying to obtain a court order to stop BA’s proposed alterations to the working arrangements of cabin crews. The union is also threatening to ballot for strike action.

The Communication Workers' Union is seeking an injunction to prevent Royal Mail from using temporary staff to offset the impact of nationwide strikes by its members, who face changes to their jobs, pay and conditions.

David von Hagen, an employment partner at Winckworth Sherwood, said the High Court was unlikely to grant the orders because of the precedent it would set for public policy.

“The justice system at times has to take into account the wider public context. It would be a bold judgment to uphold an action by a union to prevent an employer from drafting in temporary workers for an essential public service,” he said, referring to the Royal Mail dispute.

In the BA case, von Hagen said a court order was “not the normal remedy” because injunctions were only a short-term preventive measure, while the dispute was about terms and conditions.

But von Hagen added that a successful injunction in both cases would be a “better weapon” for the unions because public sympathy for the strikes had dwindled.

“A court order can confirm legitimacy or illegitimacy. Holding a strike can’t. If the unions were successful in obtaining an injunction, it would be a real public relations coup, because to the outside world it would portray the employer as trying to do something unlawful,” he said.

Von Hagen, who agreed with business leaders that fears of another “winter of discontent” had been overstated, predicted some unrest in the public sector, but said the unions were no longer strong enough for such resolute action.

“You may have spasmodic strikes, but it will not be like the three-day week or the miners’ strikes. That won’t happen in a privatised and outsourced service economy,” he said.
smokerjim
Posts: 1921
Joined: 13 Jun 2007, 22:27
Gender: Male
Location: In a corner, thinking "I've picked a bad week to give up smoking..."

Re: Unions 'unlikely' to gain injunctions against BA and Royal

Post by smokerjim »

Justice is blind - until business and profits and management's draconian practice's are under threat.....nice to know where you stand ( in it up to the neck :roll: )
I don't suppose your mouth bleeds every 28 days, does it?

Mail delivery; those that can, do, those that can't, MANAGE!