IB monitoring social networking sites

[stokes11eg]

[Godric]

the IB can go and sook ma banger for all i care, a right shower of retarded f*ckwits you will ever come across

[norbert]

the IB can go and sook ma banger for all i care, a right shower of retarded f*ckwits you will ever come across

seriously the orders appear to have come from very on high in RM . IB staff might have views on the matter .

[mandy11]

Was this site created for people to say what they think, or as a honey trap, so that Big Brother can read what's on your mind. Well if you want to read my mind then hear this.---- YOU ARE LOOKING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION-----INSTEAD OF INVESTIGATING HARD WORKING PEOPLE WHO COLLAPSE AT THE END OF THE DAY THROUGH OVERWORK AND HAVE LITTLE FINANCIAL GAIN TO SHOW FOR IT-----TRY INVESTIGATING THOSE PEOPLE WHO DRIVE AROUND IN BENTLEYS AND JAGUARS----YOU MIGHT FIND IT MORE REWARDING AND A LOT MORE INTERESTING.-----AND DON'T BE SURPRISED IF POSTMEN ON THIS SITE FEEL ANGRY, AS MOST PEOPLE WOULD BE ANGRY AT HALF OF WHAT WE HAVE TO PUT UP WITH!

[Stormproof]

Was this site created for people to say what they think, or as a honey trap, so that Big Brother can read what's on your mind. Well if you want to read my mind then hear this.---- YOU ARE LOOKING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION-----INSTEAD OF INVESTIGATING HARD WORKING PEOPLE WHO COLLAPSE AT THE END OF THE DAY THROUGH OVERWORK AND HAVE LITTLE FINANCIAL GAIN TO SHOW FOR IT-----TRY INVESTIGATING THOSE PEOPLE WHO DRIVE AROUND IN BENTLEYS AND JAGUARS----YOU MIGHT FIND IT MORE REWARDING AND A LOT MORE INTERESTING.-----AND DON'T BE SURPRISED IF POSTMEN ON THIS SITE FEEL ANGRY, AS MOST PEOPLE WOULD BE ANGRY AT HALF OF WHAT WE HAVE TO PUT UP WITH!

[chunk]

I should think the IB have enough to do with the current levels of fraud and theft than worry about a load of disaffected staff posting on here.
Read these sites all day long just to find out that posties ain't happy? Sounds more like the Conspiracy Theorist's inherent and universal belief that Big Brother's watching you....

during the 2007 stike i was posting on a local newspapers online comments section and was informed by a manager
that hey had been watching certain posts with interest.
but as my post included only my first name and they couldn't prove it was me anyhow.
i told them to stick it.
the gchq quip was meant as
after all we are not terrorists.

[norbert]

Yes-and D.G.P and his sidekick D.V are NOT poster perverts. I love my boss.

[stokes11eg]

so that's what they mean when they say getting it up.

[BELIAL]

GCHQ e-mail, "you'd be surprised what we do"


I love Fidel Crozier and his beard.
Maggies farm

[smokerjim]

after all we are not terrorists.

Not according to Manchester Evening News jounalist Angela Epstein!!!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b0 ... pisode_39/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Just listen to her after 17:10 - unbelievable!

[jaja]

the IB can go and sook ma banger for all i care, a right shower of retarded f*ckwits you will ever come across

seriously the orders appear to have come from very on high in RM . IB staff might have views on the matter .

I think IB are more interested in losses and theft !!

[sonofuberman]

the IB can go and sook ma banger for all i care, a right shower of retarded f*ckwits you will ever come across

seriously the orders appear to have come from very on high in RM . IB staff might have views on the matter .

I think IB are more interested in losses and theft !!

I think they'll have enough to do trying to find the missing items of mail, once these 30,000 emergency p/t staff have been hired. Or does the 30,000 include a few IB recruits to chase some of the lost letters.

[smokerjim]

I play loads of games on one of these sites & consequently accept loads of people as friends to help advance me.......however nobody except real friends ( ie those I have met and spoken to ) know I am a postman - and I plan on keeping it that way.

[smokerjim]

I play loads of games on one of these sites & consequently accept loads of people as friends to help advance me.......however nobody except real friends ( ie those I have met and spoken to ) know I am a postman - and I plan on keeping it that way.

but woudnt Royal Mail know your name and the fact that you are a postman ???

I'll conceed the point, however as I make no public mention of RM or even my employment status on site, they would have no cause to pull me up on it, in fact as I have not discussed my opinions on RM anywhere other than here, or on the street to customers / face to face with friends they would have3 a sod of a job to accuse me of bringing RM into disrepute ( and even if they do, I would be asking how they got that information with legal methods.....I'm quite certain "In The Back" at Private Eye magazine might be interested in some of RMs dirty tricks )

[norbert]

I play loads of games on one of these sites & consequently accept loads of people as friends to help advance me.......however nobody except real friends ( ie those I have met and spoken to ) know I am a postman - and I plan on keeping it that way.

but woudnt Royal Mail know your name and the fact that you are a postman ???

I'll conceed the point, however as I make no public mention of RM or even my employment status on site, they would have no cause to pull me up on it, in fact as I have not discussed my opinions on RM anywhere other than here, or on the street to customers / face to face with friends they would have3 a sod of a job to accuse me of bringing RM into disrepute ( and even if they do, I would be asking how they got that information with legal methods.....I'm quite certain "In The Back" at Private Eye magazine might be interested in some of RMs dirty tricks )

Private Eye normally would be but unfortunately there's too much middle class & public schoolboy " satire " about RM & strikes in that magazine instead of giving the likes of Crozier , Bryden & Higson the same treatment they give to other " Captains of Industry " & senior high profile managerial figures .

The pretexts that RM are using are flimsy for " inflammatory " - read agit - prop , it's what unions do FFS , for " personal attacks " on high profile key staff read vitriolic criticisms of apparent competence . Also the question has to begged - are the anti RM views any different to what the CWU have publicly said or what the Liberal Papers or Private Eye have occasionally published in the public domain ?

It's no coincidence that RM have hired a US union busting firm and there will be more than the usual dirty tricks .