ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

RM bosses got £10m bonuses for 'efficiency drive'

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
Stormproof
Posts: 6116
Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
Gender: Female

RM bosses got £10m bonuses for 'efficiency drive'

Post by Stormproof »

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ho ... 01011.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Royal Mail bosses got £10m bonuses for 'efficiency drive'

The measures that have angered workers into strike vote brought executives multimillion pound rewards

By Brian Brady, Whitehall Editor

Sunday, 11 October 2009

Royal Mail bosses have split more than £10m in "performance-related bonus" payments for pushing through the efficiency measures that have helped to push the organisation towards a national strike, it emerged yesterday.

A total of 13 current and former executives at the Government-owned company have been rewarded for hitting a series of targets to modernise key elements of the business, including Royal Mail and the Postal Service.

Chief executive Adam Crozier has been awarded a total of £2.4m in performance bonuses since arriving at the company in 2003. The figure boosted his £3.6m salary over the period by two-thirds – but it does not include a series of further perks that have added millions to his pay package during his time at the troubled company.

A Labour MP condemned the executives yesterday for taking so much money out of a struggling company – and complained that they were "rewarding themselves for failure".

Details of the hefty rewards for the tiny group of executives at the Royal Mail Group emerged as more than 140,000 postal workers this week prepare to take strike action over job security and working conditions.

The Royal Mail caused uproar last year when it revealed that Mr Crozier received a package worth more than £3m – about 180 times a typical postman's salary – at a time when he was pushing to close 2,500 post offices.

An investigation by The Independent on Sunday has revealed that Mr Crozier is not the only beneficiary of the company's success in forcing through changes deemed "absolutely essential" by senior managers. Since 2002/3, Royal Mail Group has paid its executive board members – who typically number between four and six at a time – a total of more than £22m in salaries alone. But the executives received £10.7m in performance-related bonuses.

The bonus bill has risen from £616,000, shared between seven executives and the former non-executive chairman Allan Leighton in 2002/3, to £1.03m split by just four individuals last year.

Royal Mail made an operating profit of £321m in the year to 31 March, but it was the first time in 20 years that all four parts of the business had been profitable.

Geraldine Smith, the Labour MP leading the campaign against any privatisation of the service, said: "At a time when they are telling us how perilous the Royal Mail's position is, they should not be taking millions of pounds out of the company. Anyone can make people redundant or cancel the second delivery."

A Communication Workers Union (CWU) spokeswoman said: "It's a disgrace that managers who are running down the business take unwarranted reward when they impose change on a low-paid workforce. These managers are failing to address the problems that postal workers face and failing to modernise the business effectively."

A Royal Mail spokeswoman said: "Pay for Royal Mail executives is set out completely transparently every year in the annual report, including for the year ended 31 March 2009, when Royal Mail more than doubled its profits in spite of the sharp drop in the market and tough economic conditions."

What the Royal Mail board members got

2002-03

Allan Leighton, former non-executive chairman

Salary £129,000

Bonus £889,000


Adam Crozier, chief executive

Salary £3,612,000

Bonus £2,467,000


Alan Cook, director

Salary £1,046,000

Bonus £473,000


Ian Duncan, director

Salary £925,000

Bonus £429,000


Mark Higson, director

Salary £848,000

Bonus £313,000


Former directors

David Burden

Salary £821,000

Bonus £428,000


Ian Griffiths

Salary £1,000,000

Bonus £262,000


Tony McCarthy

Salary £1,369,000

Bonus £641,000


David Mills

Salary £818,000

Bonus £322,000


Marisa Cassoni

Salary £963,000

Bonus £340,000


Elmar Toime

Salary £541,000

Bonus £178,000


Jerry Cope

Salary £318,000

Bonus £113,000


John Roberts

Salary £561,000

Bonus £185,000


2008-09

Adam Crozier

Salary £633,000

Bonus £453,000


Alan Cook

Salary £282,000

Bonus £166,000


Ian Duncan

Salary £325,000

Bonus £186,000


Mark Higson

Salary £428,000

Bonus £231,000
So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets


Illegitimi non carborundum
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32729
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: RM bosses got £10m bonuses for 'efficiency drive'

Post by POSTMAN »

It's a lovely Sunday Morning,and i've just been cheered up even more!
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
postghost
Posts: 433
Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 21:19

Re: RM bosses got £10m bonuses for 'efficiency drive'

Post by postghost »

POSTMAN wrote:It's a lovely Sunday Morning,and i've just been cheered up even more!
Amen.

Just hope this helps sway public opinion.
rhino49
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1644
Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 21:50
Gender: Male
Location: At home with my feet up

Power to the Posties

Post by rhino49 »

This seems to be reflected throughout industry and finance at the moment - the more you take off the people who actually make your business work, and the more you reduce the expenditure on their welfare and working conditions - the more reward you get. The savings that are made DON'T go into the company to improve it's stability - they go into the pockets of the decision makers - it's like them having their own little printing press for money and it is morally wrong.

We must now put ourselves in the position where we become the decision makers and set an example to our friends and colleagues in British industry that will change this reprehensible culture of wealth at the expense of humanity.

POWER TO THE POSTIES
We wish to serve - but we will not be servile
UNION IVOR
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 137
Joined: 14 May 2007, 04:57
Gender: Male
Location: london

Re: RM bosses got £10m bonuses for 'efficiency drive'

Post by UNION IVOR »

The working man always gets kicked in the teeth :cfo :mfo
krussel
Posts: 5299
Joined: 26 Jan 2009, 18:03
Gender: Male
Location: Out on the streets.

Re: RM bosses got £10m bonuses for 'efficiency drive'

Post by krussel »

And why are we so surprised :arrrghhh :arrrghhh
Rows of houses all bearing down on me........I can feel their blue hands touching me.......All these things in all positions.........All these things will one day take control..........
piranha
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 496
Joined: 01 Aug 2007, 09:30
Gender: Male

Re: RM bosses got £10m bonuses for 'efficiency drive'

Post by piranha »

So thats's almost 20% of Royal Mails total profit and justifiable because???????

:cfo :evil/mad :mfo
baldrick
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 5038
Joined: 13 Sep 2007, 23:37
Gender: Male

Re: RM bosses got £10m bonuses for 'efficiency drive'

Post by baldrick »

Because they're worth it! :crazy: ;liar ;liar ;liar


I hope the Telegraph doesn't think I mean this.
chunk
Posts: 957
Joined: 29 Jul 2009, 20:21
Gender: Male

Re: RM bosses got £10m bonuses for 'efficiency drive'

Post by chunk »

[quote="piranha"]So thats's almost 20% of Royal Mails total profit and justifiable because???????


I cant help help wondering how many bicycles etc you can provide with 10 million to invest?
As this week mine had a slow puncture and a loose saddle :Boo hoo! .

Or how many full time cycle mechanics would it pay?
between 500-700 depending on wages. :shock: :crazy:
I'm a postman-and i know where you live.....
UNION IVOR
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 137
Joined: 14 May 2007, 04:57
Gender: Male
Location: london

Re: RM bosses got £10m bonuses for 'efficiency drive'

Post by UNION IVOR »

i think the workers have spoken so rm must listen .
ask the goverament to get involved is a joke with the exspence scandal,
i dont trust any of them.
they are corrupt
:cfo :mfo :evil/mad
ade@cambs
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 280
Joined: 18 May 2007, 20:03
Gender: Male
Location: Cambridge

Re: RM bosses got £10m bonuses for 'efficiency drive'

Post by ade@cambs »

Yet at every management level they still refuse to admit that there is a bonus culture, talking of which will we get our £100 and stamps this year !!
I see dead people http://www.wtfwt.co.uk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
stephen500
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1458
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 04:04

Re: RM bosses got £10m bonuses for 'efficiency drive'

Post by stephen500 »

ade@cambs wrote:Yet at every management level they still refuse to admit that there is a bonus culture, talking of which will we get our £100 and stamps this year !!
They probally hope we will strike at Christmas as we will lose our £100 bonus!
goinpostal
Posts: 395
Joined: 05 Jun 2007, 00:09
Gender: Female

Re: RM bosses got £10m bonuses for 'efficiency drive'

Post by goinpostal »

And they say we're 25 per cent overpaid! :so there
Join Labour, defend Corbyn from the Right, and fight for socialist policies
pickaname
Posts: 1467
Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 20:24

Re: RM bosses got £10m bonuses for 'efficiency drive'

Post by pickaname »

Those figures are for 2002/03 are they not?
chunk
Posts: 957
Joined: 29 Jul 2009, 20:21
Gender: Male

Re: RM bosses got £10m bonuses for 'efficiency drive'

Post by chunk »

pickaname wrote:Those figures are for 2002/03 are they not?
if you read them there is a comparison between then and now. :neutral:
I'm a postman-and i know where you live.....