not what you say but how you say it.[/quote]
please m8 not this old chestnut
a debate should be where you try to changed the others perception though reasoning.not infantile jibes.
can you go back over all your posts and read how many times youve said this in an attempt to stifle debate.
tman if what used to take one bag now takes two(forget weight most of us posties couldnt give a four x.we stuff the bag to bursting)
then clearly the amont of mail addressed and unaddressed cant be less.its nothing to do with packets either cos most of us stuff them in our panniers.
mail "volumes "are a smoke screen used by the companies to prove they need to make cuts.just like many governments in the past before, they change the measuring stick this way and that to prove anything.long and the short of it is they made a profit, the best in many years and thats after pumping millions extra into the pension fund,paying lots of solictors fees and compensation.
but thats just my opinion m8 take it or leave it

