ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
CWU expenditure
-
wranglered
- Posts: 365
- Joined: 29 Jan 2007, 16:40
- Location: Lincolnshire
Re: CWU expenditure
Fair comment, but then again this would also fall under health and safety at work, so arguaby this should be their remit.
Having said that, if my experience of local and area health and safety reps is anything to go by, we would be wasting our time and money here as well.....
There are stories here that will never be told becuase you just wouldn't believe them!
Having said that, if my experience of local and area health and safety reps is anything to go by, we would be wasting our time and money here as well.....
There are stories here that will never be told becuase you just wouldn't believe them!
-
andy2007
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 10:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: Earth
Re: CWU expenditure
I realise that (I've heard a few myself). But I'm very lucky, in that my Area Reps (and local ones too) are excellent. And surely there must be some other areas, who can say the same.
As Environmental issues are considered to be so newsworthy these days (personally I'm glad of that). A few good examples hitting the headlines, would hopefully kick-start a more concerted campaign nationally. Don't forget: RM have tried to play the Environmental card, many times. Remember these?
http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... ectric+van" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... ectric+van" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
But wouldn't it be better. If we (the Union) were able to come up with a properly structured approach. Which could decimate the REAL Carbon Footprint of RM. By banning the use of private cars?
They're not all little runabouts. There's Jeeps, and Performance Cars, being used too.
As Environmental issues are considered to be so newsworthy these days (personally I'm glad of that). A few good examples hitting the headlines, would hopefully kick-start a more concerted campaign nationally. Don't forget: RM have tried to play the Environmental card, many times. Remember these?
http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... ectric+van" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... ectric+van" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
But wouldn't it be better. If we (the Union) were able to come up with a properly structured approach. Which could decimate the REAL Carbon Footprint of RM. By banning the use of private cars?
They're not all little runabouts. There's Jeeps, and Performance Cars, being used too.
Don't knock Insanity
it's just another outlook on Reality!
it's just another outlook on Reality!
-
Big Daz
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU expenditure
Andy
As far as i know the status of envitromental reps/activity in the CWU is this,
CWU support enviromental reps and like other unions want them to be granted the same legal rights as Safety reps, which include release paid for by the employer not the union!!!
The Enviroment comes under Dave Joyce as his department if you all recall is called the Health,Safety and Enviroment Department and has been for a few years now.
Being involved in Enviromental issues is certainly nothing new for the CWU, they are simply increasing activity levels in this area which the recent and very first ever CWU and the Enviroment raising awarness course is part of.
The next step is for HQ to decide how enviromental issues are going to be looked after, do we create stand alone enviromental reps or add it on the existing safety rep role?
If stand alone then how do we structure them local area regional divisonal etc etc
To the best of my knowledge HQ have not decided those question's answer yet.
Also in the absence of paid leave rights how are the CWU going to progress enviomental activity? voluntay or unpaid union leave?
As far as i know the status of envitromental reps/activity in the CWU is this,
CWU support enviromental reps and like other unions want them to be granted the same legal rights as Safety reps, which include release paid for by the employer not the union!!!
The Enviroment comes under Dave Joyce as his department if you all recall is called the Health,Safety and Enviroment Department and has been for a few years now.
Being involved in Enviromental issues is certainly nothing new for the CWU, they are simply increasing activity levels in this area which the recent and very first ever CWU and the Enviroment raising awarness course is part of.
The next step is for HQ to decide how enviromental issues are going to be looked after, do we create stand alone enviromental reps or add it on the existing safety rep role?
If stand alone then how do we structure them local area regional divisonal etc etc
To the best of my knowledge HQ have not decided those question's answer yet.
Also in the absence of paid leave rights how are the CWU going to progress enviomental activity? voluntay or unpaid union leave?
-
Big Daz
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU expenditure
What is it you wish them to do they are not doing? Why not check out the rule book before passing judgement?wranglered wrote: ...and how many of these extra positions do anything or are actually available for members everyday needs?
....in my branch, the one that sponsors Noel McClean, NONE OF THEM....
Are you aware that the only release I get as political officer is to attend BC meetings?
Everything else that is required I do in my own time on my own PC using my own electric, own paper, own ink. Unlike yourself Ive never had a CWU laptop
I have my credentials on display on the CWU notice board in my D.O, will have to get the detail of the role as per CWU rules on display not that anybody ever looks at anything on the notice board despite all the hours of TLC I put into it.
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU expenditure
I think that CWU expenditure has everything to do with saving money and nothing to do with saving the environment nor any of the other nonsense issues that cost us money without a shred of use to improve the working conditions of postmen and women across the land. We apparently have money to waste on these issues and not enough money to see that the ballots are in order.
-
Big Daz
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU expenditure
Extra resource HAS been drafted in to help process all the ballot requests.
-
Tman
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57
Re: CWU expenditure
You old cynic dvbuk55.dvbuk55 wrote:I think that CWU expenditure has everything to do with saving money and nothing to do with saving the environment nor any of the other nonsense issues that cost us money without a shred of use to improve the working conditions of postmen and women across the land. We apparently have money to waste on these issues and not enough money to see that the ballots are in order.
You'll be saying next that the CWU shouldn't get involved in the plight of the Costa Rican tree frog farmers, ( or whatever the latest hot topic is) and should concentrate on what happens in the UK and RM.
Now there's a thought....
-
axeman
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: 12 Jun 2007, 17:57
Re: CWU expenditure
Very astute of you tman youv'e hit the nail right on the head just why doesn't royal fail follow your joined up thinking and concentrate on it's 'uk.market' instead of 'going global' 
-
wranglered
- Posts: 365
- Joined: 29 Jan 2007, 16:40
- Location: Lincolnshire
Re: CWU expenditure
Big Daz wrote:What is it you wish them to do they are not doing? Why not check out the rule book before passing judgement?wranglered wrote: ...and how many of these extra positions do anything or are actually available for members everyday needs?
....in my branch, the one that sponsors Noel McClean, NONE OF THEM....
Are you aware that the only release I get as political officer is to attend BC meetings?
Everything else that is required I do in my own time on my own PC using my own electric, own paper, own ink. Unlike yourself Ive never had a CWU laptop.
I have my credentials on display on the CWU notice board in my D.O, will have to get the detail of the role as per CWU rules on display not that anybody ever looks at anything on the notice board despite all the hours of TLC I put into it.
1. That is my experience. They do nothing of any value. It is also my opinion and I am entitled to express it.
2. I know the rule books inside out. I also know that yours and my branch ignore them completely when they see fit.
3. You never attend BC meetings...you told me that yourself. The only time you bother to show at any kind of union meeting is if one of the royalty from Head Office attends.
4. I have seen expense claims from you when I viewed the accounts so don't tell everyone you do it at your own expense....
5. I have a laptop that will be returned to the CWU when the CWU see fit to honour my legitimate expense claims that are now unpaid for over a year. That is business, something you and your buddies know nothing about, except how to use members subscriptions on jollies to HQ and Alvescot.
6. So who released you to go on the Enviromental Reps course? More importantly, who paid for it?
-
mailsort6
- Posts: 356
- Joined: 11 Aug 2007, 13:22
Re: CWU expenditure
I relate with what you are trying to say, the only reason why some reps or officals do nothing of value is because the IR reps are doing it all and they are not suppose to. It is up to the political officer, legal/medical officer, ULR, etc to promote their roles. I have seen reps not knowing what their remits are and some reps and officals are not even trained because they are not sent on courses, therefore they are just left in limbo, however, this is not the same within all branches and its about time there was more communciation between the different reps, instead of some reps thinking that they are more important than others.wranglered wrote:Big Daz wrote:What is it you wish them to do they are not doing? Why not check out the rule book before passing judgement?wranglered wrote: ...and how many of these extra positions do anything or are actually available for members everyday needs?
....in my branch, the one that sponsors Noel McClean, NONE OF THEM....
Are you aware that the only release I get as political officer is to attend BC meetings?
Everything else that is required I do in my own time on my own PC using my own electric, own paper, own ink. Unlike yourself Ive never had a CWU laptop.
I have my credentials on display on the CWU notice board in my D.O, will have to get the detail of the role as per CWU rules on display not that anybody ever looks at anything on the notice board despite all the hours of TLC I put into it.
1. That is my experience. They do nothing of any value. It is also my opinion and I am entitled to express it.
2. I know the rule books inside out. I also know that yours and my branch ignore them completely when they see fit.
3. You never attend BC meetings...you told me that yourself. The only time you bother to show at any kind of union meeting is if one of the royalty from Head Office attends.
4. I have seen expense claims from you when I viewed the accounts so don't tell everyone you do it at your own expense....
5. I have a laptop that will be returned to the CWU when the CWU see fit to honour my legitimate expense claims that are now unpaid for over a year. That is business, something you and your buddies know nothing about, except how to use members subscriptions on jollies to HQ and Alvescot.
6. So who released you to go on the Enviromental Reps course? More importantly, who paid for it?
-
Big Daz
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU expenditure
Mr W please retract comment three as it is incorrect.
I have had a lot of trouble getting release and I certainly havent told you I cant be bothered to attend meetings.
If you think that when a union meeting falls on Annual leave the rep officer should still attend then please by all means let us know that is your view and bring forth some arguments to support it.
Who released me for alvescot, lets see now Yep it was my DOM!!
Safety reps had their wages paid by RML/BT for the course that is the aggrement struck up between CWU and RML/BT.
Jollies to alvescot? Nothing jolly about being in a classroom enviroment between 9 am and 6pm its bloddy hard work when your used to a 6 hour day delivery postie job. But its worth it for the knowledge I gained which I will put to good use as and when enviromental reps come into existence in the CWU and Im fortunate enough to take on such a role.
As yet Ive not had the oppurtunity to show that my being on the course was worthwhile, why ? Because we havent got enviromental reps yet!!!! And yes im rather puzzled by that considering how long ago the course was announced and emails to the postal departmnet about how these reps will fit in the structure in terms of RML were met with dont know what your talking about.
Oh and Alvercsot is massivley cutting down its expenditure their electric bill has already dropped big time through the introduction of energy effiency measures, solar panels, on site allotment (which reduces food costs)!!!
Lets hope HQ follow suit!!!
Have you retained your membership is that info not available for RMC?
I have had a lot of trouble getting release and I certainly havent told you I cant be bothered to attend meetings.
If you think that when a union meeting falls on Annual leave the rep officer should still attend then please by all means let us know that is your view and bring forth some arguments to support it.
Who released me for alvescot, lets see now Yep it was my DOM!!
Safety reps had their wages paid by RML/BT for the course that is the aggrement struck up between CWU and RML/BT.
Jollies to alvescot? Nothing jolly about being in a classroom enviroment between 9 am and 6pm its bloddy hard work when your used to a 6 hour day delivery postie job. But its worth it for the knowledge I gained which I will put to good use as and when enviromental reps come into existence in the CWU and Im fortunate enough to take on such a role.
As yet Ive not had the oppurtunity to show that my being on the course was worthwhile, why ? Because we havent got enviromental reps yet!!!! And yes im rather puzzled by that considering how long ago the course was announced and emails to the postal departmnet about how these reps will fit in the structure in terms of RML were met with dont know what your talking about.
Oh and Alvercsot is massivley cutting down its expenditure their electric bill has already dropped big time through the introduction of energy effiency measures, solar panels, on site allotment (which reduces food costs)!!!
Lets hope HQ follow suit!!!
Have you retained your membership is that info not available for RMC?
-
wranglered
- Posts: 365
- Joined: 29 Jan 2007, 16:40
- Location: Lincolnshire
Re: CWU expenditure
spot on!!!!!mailsort6 wrote:I relate with what you are trying to say, the only reason why some reps or officals do nothing of value is because the IR reps are doing it all and they are not suppose to. It is up to the political officer, legal/medical officer, ULR, etc to promote their roles. I have seen reps not knowing what their remits are and some reps and officals are not even trained because they are not sent on courses, therefore they are just left in limbo, however, this is not the same within all branches and its about time there was more communciation between the different reps, instead of some reps thinking that they are more important than others.wranglered wrote:Big Daz wrote:What is it you wish them to do they are not doing? Why not check out the rule book before passing judgement?wranglered wrote: ...and how many of these extra positions do anything or are actually available for members everyday needs?
....in my branch, the one that sponsors Noel McClean, NONE OF THEM....
Are you aware that the only release I get as political officer is to attend BC meetings?
Everything else that is required I do in my own time on my own PC using my own electric, own paper, own ink. Unlike yourself Ive never had a CWU laptop.
I have my credentials on display on the CWU notice board in my D.O, will have to get the detail of the role as per CWU rules on display not that anybody ever looks at anything on the notice board despite all the hours of TLC I put into it.
1. That is my experience. They do nothing of any value. It is also my opinion and I am entitled to express it.
2. I know the rule books inside out. I also know that yours and my branch ignore them completely when they see fit.
3. You never attend BC meetings...you told me that yourself. The only time you bother to show at any kind of union meeting is if one of the royalty from Head Office attends.
4. I have seen expense claims from you when I viewed the accounts so don't tell everyone you do it at your own expense....
5. I have a laptop that will be returned to the CWU when the CWU see fit to honour my legitimate expense claims that are now unpaid for over a year. That is business, something you and your buddies know nothing about, except how to use members subscriptions on jollies to HQ and Alvescot.
6. So who released you to go on the Enviromental Reps course? More importantly, who paid for it?
-
andy2007
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 10:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: Earth
BC Meetings
Could everyone please now drop the subject of who does/does not attend BC meetings and why! No-one outside of Big Daz, and Wranglered's area. Knows who's right, and whos wrong. And as it was a serious accusation. This is NOT the place to be discussing it.
Both sides have given their side of the story, and this must be an end to it.
Both sides have given their side of the story, and this must be an end to it.
Don't knock Insanity
it's just another outlook on Reality!
it's just another outlook on Reality!
-
Big Daz
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU expenditure
For the record this year there has been ocassions where my DOM has not released me for BC meetings. It got to the point where the branch secretary wrote to my DOM and the cluster manager asking them to follow the IR framework/ACAS guidelines and making it clear if they did not stop cancelling/refusing release then the matter would be taken to a tribunal.
At one point i was told I was not reconised even though the IR framework is blatantly clear that the structure of the CWU is a matter for the CWU and not RML.
Since then I have had release succesfully on two occasions, hoping to have a days CWU release next week to attend a case meeting with a mbr who was sacked under stage 3 sick leave and I will be submitting release form for a Branch committee meeting next month and one for a letter section meeting which willbe the first one since Dw visted as untill today I had not been the local rep due to not putting back in for the role.
At one point i was told I was not reconised even though the IR framework is blatantly clear that the structure of the CWU is a matter for the CWU and not RML.
Since then I have had release succesfully on two occasions, hoping to have a days CWU release next week to attend a case meeting with a mbr who was sacked under stage 3 sick leave and I will be submitting release form for a Branch committee meeting next month and one for a letter section meeting which willbe the first one since Dw visted as untill today I had not been the local rep due to not putting back in for the role.