I don't call it anything. Like TBT (above) I put "--" around "competition" to emphasise it's thier word not mine.It now costs RM less to deliver a letter, than it did before Competition. But the quality of service now, is a sad joke, compared to what it was, just 10 years ago. You call that progress?!?!?
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
The Union and 'Modernisation'
-
Tman
- Posts: 4149
- Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57
Re: The Union and 'Modernisation'
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72775
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Re: The Union and 'Modernisation'
Not me Pickaname did but you did seem to miss it in your reply perhaps Andy did the same. However, I would be interested to know what "Modernisation" has meant in a Mail Centre - from both posties and technical staff as all I have heard is that various machines and techniques have changed but have heard no personal views.Tman wrote:I don't call it anything. Like TBT (above) I put "--" around "competition" to emphasise it's thier word not mine.It now costs RM less to deliver a letter, than it did before Competition. But the quality of service now, is a sad joke, compared to what it was, just 10 years ago. You call that progress?!?!?
One thing I am certain is that at my DO we see more Crash Sorting when MC is under pressure. The last missort run from the MC seems to be growing and the Mech Bundles have a higher % of missorts than I can ever remember. Not what I would personally call progress.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
k979aaa
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
- Gender: Male
- Location: THE NORTH
Re: The Union and 'Modernisation'
Yes quality and precision went out with time and cost and what did we gain? an 8 billion pound pension deficit and a bullying management culture!. HOW BADLY CAN A COMPANY BE RUN TO RACK AND RUIN!.TrueBlueTerrier wrote:Not me Pickaname did but you did seem to miss it in your reply perhaps Andy did the same. However, I would be interested to know what "Modernisation" has meant in a Mail Centre - from both posties and technical staff as all I have heard is that various machines and techniques have changed but have heard no personal views.Tman wrote:I don't call it anything. Like TBT (above) I put "--" around "competition" to emphasise it's thier word not mine.It now costs RM less to deliver a letter, than it did before Competition. But the quality of service now, is a sad joke, compared to what it was, just 10 years ago. You call that progress?!?!?
One thing I am certain is that at my DO we see more Crash Sorting when MC is under pressure. The last missort run from the MC seems to be growing and the Mech Bundles have a higher % of missorts than I can ever remember. Not what I would personally call progress.
-
borders
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 09:10
Re: The Union and 'Modernisation'
i have worked in the same MC for 13 years now , i can honestly say in that time , all that has happened is that the management has added extra boxes on the LSMs with some new software and we have had the toilets re-decorated , paid for with our first-line fix money. the air-conditioning does not work and we have holes in the roof. the rain is caught by an ingenious method of using plastic sheeting, funnels and black bins. can anyone tell me if we are fully up on this modernisation lark ??
Last edited by borders on 05 Jul 2009, 22:34, edited 1 time in total.
"why should it just be the bankers, politicians and the idle rich who get all the best things ? we demand a standard of living for our members that enables them to share in the fine wines and times that the likes of Cameron and his Eton buddies take for granted " - the late great Bob Crow RIP.
-
pinstripe
- Posts: 2474
- Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
- Gender: Male
- Location: 2 left turns from reality
Re: The Union and 'Modernisation'
Mandy says "modernisation", RM say "modernisation" and the CWU say "modernisation". All 3 have different interpretations of what this means.
For Mandy it means, bringing us into line by reducing costs only, for RM it means buying a couple of all singing all dancing machines that won't work or be up to the job, and reducing the workforce, for the CWU it means new machines coupled with a SWW, minimal job losses, protection and a greater input into the decision making process for those who actually know the job.
For us, the frontline staff, it means nothing except more work on already stretched duties.
IMO, it should mean a more efficient way of delivering mail, not necessarily quicker, not cheaper but just efficient.
This "modernisation" bogey-man has been doing the rounds for years, but in my DO, except for the introduction of a dozen PDA's for drivers and scrapping the bikes, a postman from the 1960's wouldn't notice any change.
For Mandy it means, bringing us into line by reducing costs only, for RM it means buying a couple of all singing all dancing machines that won't work or be up to the job, and reducing the workforce, for the CWU it means new machines coupled with a SWW, minimal job losses, protection and a greater input into the decision making process for those who actually know the job.
For us, the frontline staff, it means nothing except more work on already stretched duties.
IMO, it should mean a more efficient way of delivering mail, not necessarily quicker, not cheaper but just efficient.
This "modernisation" bogey-man has been doing the rounds for years, but in my DO, except for the introduction of a dozen PDA's for drivers and scrapping the bikes, a postman from the 1960's wouldn't notice any change.
-
lekker
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 364
- Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 21:26
- Gender: Male
Re: The Union and 'Modernisation'
oh I think he wouldpinstripe wrote:Mandy says "modernisation", RM say "modernisation" and the CWU say "modernisation". All 3 have different interpretations of what this means.
For Mandy it means, bringing us into line by reducing costs only, for RM it means buying a couple of all singing all dancing machines that won't work or be up to the job, and reducing the workforce, for the CWU it means new machines coupled with a SWW, minimal job losses, protection and a greater input into the decision making process for those who actually know the job.
For us, the frontline staff, it means nothing except more work on already stretched duties.
IMO, it should mean a more efficient way of delivering mail, not necessarily quicker, not cheaper but just efficient.
This "modernisation" bogey-man has been doing the rounds for years, but in my DO, except for the introduction of a dozen PDA's for drivers and scrapping the bikes, a postman from the 1960's wouldn't notice any change.
-
Cliff Clavin
- Posts: 184
- Joined: 25 Aug 2008, 21:29
- Gender: Male
Re: The Union and 'Modernisation'
Any chance of a transferpinstripe wrote: but in my DO, except for the introduction of a dozen PDA's for drivers and scrapping the bikes, a postman from the 1960's wouldn't notice any change.
-
BELIAL
- Posts: 6758
- Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
- Gender: Female
- Location: Nowhere
Re: The Union and 'Modernisation'
You sussed it thenpinstripe wrote:Mandy says "modernisation", RM say "modernisation" and the CWU say "modernisation". All 3 have different interpretations of what this means.
For Mandy it means, bringing us into line by reducing costs only, for RM it means buying a couple of all singing all dancing machines that won't work or be up to the job, and reducing the workforce, for the CWU it means new machines coupled with a SWW, minimal job losses, protection and a greater input into the decision making process for those who actually know the job.
For us, the frontline staff, it means nothing except more work on already stretched duties.
IMO, it should mean a more efficient way of delivering mail, not necessarily quicker, not cheaper but just efficient.
This "modernisation" bogey-man has been doing the rounds for years, but in my DO, except for the introduction of a dozen PDA's for drivers and scrapping the bikes, a postman from the 1960's wouldn't notice any change.
Bye