but i also dont expect to be payed for not working unless its a term and condition of employment
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Test case against royal mail
-
lover
- Posts: 108
- Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 23:16
- Gender: Female
Re: Test case against royal mail
thats my view.i dont do anything work related without pay...
but i also dont expect to be payed for not working unless its a term and condition of employment

but i also dont expect to be payed for not working unless its a term and condition of employment
-
marky
- Posts: 402
- Joined: 18 May 2007, 23:41
- Gender: Male
- Location: could be barred
Re: Test case against royal mail
no way will the union back you if it costs money, they need it all for bournemouth. 
rmld.....
-
andy2007
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 10:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: Earth
Re: Test case against royal mail
And what about the people, who without treatment. Would become too ill to go to work, and end up on Sick Leave?lover wrote:thats my view.i dont do anything work related without pay...
but i also dont expect to be payed for not working unless its a term and condition of employment![]()
It's a false economy for RM to penalise people for having no choice, but to go to appointments during work time.
Don't knock Insanity
it's just another outlook on Reality!
it's just another outlook on Reality!
-
97gaz
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 1023
- Joined: 17 Dec 2008, 10:15
- Gender: Male
Re: Test case against royal mail
Like everything else that goes on in RM, there is no consistency. Been a couple of years since I needed a hospital appointment but prior to that I seemed to be going 4-5 times a year. And when you are going to see consultants you don't have a choice when to go. They all seem to be in the mornings and one of mine is even on a Saturday Morning. However I have always been given paid time off for them. It has gone down on my absence record but does not count against sick leave. Maybe it's changed or possibly I had a good DOM but thats how it's worked for me.