baldrick wrote:You mean you can't afford a chauffeur?
You know how it is ,Iwas down one D2D this week ,I had to let him go
baldrick wrote:You mean you can't afford a chauffeur?
Must remember too pay the cleaner £6500 should do i will get it from the small change and its a bit rich coming from you NT do tell us all what your function is (AGENT PROVOCATEUR) or is it something more juicy than the humble postie?.Night Tonic wrote:I don't support theirs OR yours:) As for poor postmen, who are you trying to kid.k979aaa wrote:If you are told the price for which you could sell your services you would be as bankrupt financially as morally ignorant too the cause and effect of royalmail's policies which you so vehemently support!.Night Tonic wrote:Correction. It wasn't the public service that made a profit. Business mail yes but public no.
This is NT talking about his RM Pension, and how much it will mean to him when he retiresPostby Night Tonic » Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:03,pm
Rhetoric? This pension will matter greatly in 18 months time when I retire. If you're retired, then you will know I stand to lose far more than you. Rhetoric no, realistic yes.
Postby Night Tonic » Thu Dec 18, 2008 9:40,pm
Everyone can opt-out and the option has been there for years. I just happened to stumble across one before I joined RM and as I won't be working no I won't be contributing back into a pension I didn't pay into in the first place . Given the sheer volume of pensions wiped out over the years, i don't see why everyone else should carry the can on the RM pension either if as some seem to believe, the deficit was due to the pension holiday. How right T-man is. Same old replies.
Is that rhetoric or reality NTNight Tonic wrote:Common or not amongst the sheep hell bent on running off the cliff?
Apparently there are rumours that up to 8 PPS may revolt - 1 did at the start and resigned from his position. IIRC it was Pat McFaddens PPS.Shrek wrote:Did anyone here 5 live at 2pmish. A pps for the Government (Business I think) tried not to disagree with policy of part privatisation but did say that she thought their could be a lot better options. Just caught the end of it but she did say she would not like to think she could vote against the Government.
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:Apparently there are rumours that up to 8 PPS may revolt - 1 did at the start and resigned from his position. IIRC it was Pat McFaddens PPS.Shrek wrote:Did anyone here 5 live at 2pmish. A pps for the Government (Business I think) tried not to disagree with policy of part privatisation but did say that she thought their could be a lot better options. Just caught the end of it but she did say she would not like to think she could vote against the Government.
time traveling according to another threadrockytony67 wrote:This is NT talking about his RM Pension, and how much it will mean to him when he retiresPostby Night Tonic » Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:03,pm
Rhetoric? This pension will matter greatly in 18 months time when I retire. If you're retired, then you will know I stand to lose far more than you. Rhetoric no, realistic yes.![]()
Postby Night Tonic » Thu Dec 18, 2008 9:40,pm
Everyone can opt-out and the option has been there for years. I just happened to stumble across one before I joined RM and as I won't be working no I won't be contributing back into a pension I didn't pay into in the first place . Given the sheer volume of pensions wiped out over the years, i don't see why everyone else should carry the can on the RM pension either if as some seem to believe, the deficit was due to the pension holiday. How right T-man is. Same old replies.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Come on people, if you don't know what he's up to by now, you never will