ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Currans letter proves costly for some of her constituents

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72604
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Currans letter proves costly for some of her constituents

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news/di ... tuents.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

It's the postal equivalent of a reverse charge call.

Now residents in Glasgow's east end are finding that to hear about their local MSP's latest exploits by mail it is proving an expensive business.

In the past fortnight an administrative blunder has led to sections of Margaret Curran's Baillieston constituency receiving cards from Royal Mail telling them they are required to pay a surcharge on a letter awaiting them at the local sorting office, only for them to discover that, upon handing over the required £1.30, the item in question is a newsletter from their MSP about antisocial behaviour.

Labour insists Ms Curran's constituency office has had a single call from a constituent on the matter but refused to provide figures as to how many homes were affected by the glitch.

It is understood the error was confined to constituents living in several streets in the Mount Vernon area, as well as parts of nearby Springboig, and that it occurred because the mailshots had either no or insufficient stamps.

David McDonald, a SNP councillor in the area, said he had been approached by three constituents on the matter and claimed their reactions "ranged from anger to amazement".

One Mount Vernon resident, James Gibson, said when he went to collect his mail from the Shettleston sorting office several other people were there for the same thing.

The 53-year-old said: "When one chap opened it and saw what it was he just threw it in the bin. I'm paying for this woman to send me junk mail I don't want."

Mr Gibson also insisted he contacted Ms Curran's office and was told the matter was nothing to do with them. A Labour spokesman denied Mr Gibson had called.

Last night local MP John Mason, who defeated Ms Curran last summer during the notorious Glasgow East by-election and who will face the MSP again when she gives up her Holyrood seat to fight for the Westminster role, said: "We can laugh off forgetting to put a stamp on something. I'm sure quite a few of us have been there at some stage or other.

But more serious is Margaret Curran's need to send out mailshots on just about anything to try to raise her profile. With the sheer volume of literature she's sending to constituents some errors are going to slip through."

Glasgow's sole Tory MSP, Bill Aitken, said: "Can Labour get anything right? If I were a resident affected I would be distinctly unhappy about paying £1.30 for some diatribe from Margaret Curran.

"She should be paying them to read it."

A Labour spokesperson said: "This is a typical SNP smear story."
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Currans letter proves costly for some of her constituents

Post by DGP1 »

:hmmmm Surely if it was a number of letters from one source then the surcharge should have been raised at source (I've seen the stamp 'Surcharge raised by revenue protection treat as second class').
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
prowler
Posts: 222
Joined: 01 Jul 2007, 10:36

Re: Currans letter proves costly for some of her constituents

Post by prowler »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news/di ... tuents.php

It's the postal equivalent of a reverse charge call.

Now residents in Glasgow's east end are finding that to hear about their local MSP's latest exploits by mail it is proving an expensive business.

In the past fortnight an administrative blunder has led to sections of Margaret Curran's Baillieston constituency receiving cards from Royal Mail telling them they are required to pay a surcharge on a letter awaiting them at the local sorting office, only for them to discover that, upon handing over the required £1.30, the item in question is a newsletter from their MSP about antisocial behaviour.

Labour insists Ms Curran's constituency office has had a single call from a constituent on the matter but refused to provide figures as to how many homes were affected by the glitch.

It is understood the error was confined to constituents living in several streets in the Mount Vernon area, as well as parts of nearby Springboig, and that it occurred because the mailshots had either no or insufficient stamps.

David McDonald, a SNP councillor in the area, said he had been approached by three constituents on the matter and claimed their reactions "ranged from anger to amazement".

One Mount Vernon resident, James Gibson, said when he went to collect his mail from the Shettleston sorting office several other people were there for the same thing.

The 53-year-old said: "When one chap opened it and saw what it was he just threw it in the bin. I'm paying for this woman to send me junk mail I don't want."

Mr Gibson also insisted he contacted Ms Curran's office and was told the matter was nothing to do with them. A Labour spokesman denied Mr Gibson had called.

Last night local MP John Mason, who defeated Ms Curran last summer during the notorious Glasgow East by-election and who will face the MSP again when she gives up her Holyrood seat to fight for the Westminster role, said: "We can laugh off forgetting to put a stamp on something. I'm sure quite a few of us have been there at some stage or other.

But more serious is Margaret Curran's need to send out mailshots on just about anything to try to raise her profile. With the sheer volume of literature she's sending to constituents some errors are going to slip through."

Glasgow's sole Tory MSP, Bill Aitken, said: "Can Labour get anything right? If I were a resident affected I would be distinctly unhappy about paying £1.30 for some diatribe from Margaret Curran.

"She should be paying them to read it."

A Labour spokesperson said: "This is a typical SNP smear story."
Is this the same Maggie Curran who claimed she lived in a part of Glasgow she does not in fact live in?? :crazy:
Mind you she might have a box room there, that she's claiming second home allowance on! :no no