No. I can see that you've quite bizarrely extrapolated a remark to the extent that I now allegedly dislike all workers and "paper boys" [which I take it is a reference to posties, so maybe that gives a remarkable insight into your own opinions? ]
Yours was a cheap shot as you merely reiterated someone else's little aside; I was making the point (obviously too obliquely for some) that very few actually have leadership or decision-making skills good enough to have any meaningful input to the running of a company, and you only have look to good old RM to see that in action..........
No. I can see that you've quite bizarrely extrapolated a remark to the extent that I now allegedly dislike all workers and "paper boys" [which I take it is a reference to posties, so maybe that gives a remarkable insight into your own opinions? ]
Yours was a cheap shot as you merely reiterated someone else's little aside; I was making the point (obviously too obliquely for some) that very few actually have leadership or decision-making skills good enough to have any meaningful input to the running of a company, and you only have look to good old RM to see that in action..........
the trouble with a reply like this , its like trying to decipher a coded message , who are the very few - posties, managers , the Government what ??
"why should it just be the bankers, politicians and the idle rich who get all the best things ? we demand a standard of living for our members that enables them to share in the fine wines and times that the likes of Cameron and his Eton buddies take for granted " - the late great Bob Crow RIP.
the trouble with a reply like this , its like trying to decipher a coded message , who are the very few - posties, managers , the Government what ??
Governments don't generally have much input into the day-to-day running of companies, so they can be discounted, but then posties and managers work for RM so it can't be them either. Hmm, it's a difficult one then.
How about workers in general? That was, after all, the group who were under discussion.
Not too hard after all, was it?
so do you allegedly dislike all workers or not then ?
"why should it just be the bankers, politicians and the idle rich who get all the best things ? we demand a standard of living for our members that enables them to share in the fine wines and times that the likes of Cameron and his Eton buddies take for granted " - the late great Bob Crow RIP.
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
You really can't see it can you..
Penny dropped? Try looking up 'malignant narcissism' or 'aggressive narcissism' the indicator boxes all get ticked . No wonder folks go off on one about psycho babble
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
You really can't see it can you..
Penny dropped? Try looking up 'malignant narcissism' or 'aggressive narcissism' the indicator boxes all get ticked . No wonder folks go off on one about psycho babble
So are you adding to, or condemning, psycho-babble with that particular sentence? Do you know?
As you seem keen on amateur psychiatrics, I suggest looking up "Walter Mitty Syndrome", although doubtless you won't acknowlege the symptoms or problem...
borders wrote:so do you allegedly dislike all workers or not then ?
You'll have to ask the person doing the alleging to get the answer to that, as I can't answer for his thought processes...
simple question that i am putting to you .
"why should it just be the bankers, politicians and the idle rich who get all the best things ? we demand a standard of living for our members that enables them to share in the fine wines and times that the likes of Cameron and his Eton buddies take for granted " - the late great Bob Crow RIP.
borders wrote:so do you allegedly dislike all workers or not then ?
You'll have to ask the person doing the alleging to get the answer to that, as I can't answer for his thought processes...
simple question that i am putting to you .
It may be a simple question, but I can't answer it as I didn't make the original statement/allegation. I suggest if you want the answer then scroll up to the relevant post and PM the poster.
"Yours was a cheap shot as you merely reiterated someone else's little aside; I was making the point (obviously too obliquely for some) that very few actually have leadership or decision-making skills good enough to have any meaningful input to the running of a company, and you only have look to good old RM to see that in action".......... MR TMN, i am referring to this paragraph that you wrote, who are the very few ? just asking ...
"why should it just be the bankers, politicians and the idle rich who get all the best things ? we demand a standard of living for our members that enables them to share in the fine wines and times that the likes of Cameron and his Eton buddies take for granted " - the late great Bob Crow RIP.
borders wrote:"Yours was a cheap shot as you merely reiterated someone else's little aside; I was making the point (obviously too obliquely for some) that very few actually have leadership or decision-making skills good enough to have any meaningful input to the running of a company, and you only have look to good old RM to see that in action".......... MR TMN, i am referring to this paragraph that you wrote, who are the very few ? just asking ...
Done this one already-----
the trouble with a reply like this , its like trying to decipher a coded message , who are the very few - posties, managers , the Government what ??
Governments don't generally have much input into the day-to-day running of companies, so they can be discounted, but then posties and managers work for RM so it can't be them either. Hmm, it's a difficult one then.
How about workers in general? That was, after all, the group who were under discussion.
Not too hard after all, was it?
ok i quit, you are far too shrewd for me....round and round we go
"why should it just be the bankers, politicians and the idle rich who get all the best things ? we demand a standard of living for our members that enables them to share in the fine wines and times that the likes of Cameron and his Eton buddies take for granted " - the late great Bob Crow RIP.
borders wrote:ok i quit, you are far too shrewd for me....round and round we go
Best treated with care,don't waste your time ,a very sick puppy. Statistical probability of encountering one =2% so with a family of 6000+ we get off lightly
Just search ASPD and specifically Malignant Narcissism.more scary than a yellow duck ,but he has no control
borders wrote:ok i quit, you are far too shrewd for me....round and round we go
Best treated with care,don't waste your time ,a very sick puppy. Statistical probability of encountering one =2% so with a family of 6000+ we get off lightly
Just search ASPD and specifically Malignant Narcissism.more scary than a yellow duck ,but he has no control
What's wrong with my little duck
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
Hello
]
Penny dropped? 
