How Johnson became the Labour candidate for the top job

[TrueBlueTerrier]

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 78115.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Alan Johnson has been here before. The last time, infuriatingly for his most admiring supporters, he stepped back from the opportunity to challenge Gordon Brown for the heart of the Labour Party.

Now, however, after his failure to beat Harriet Harman for the deputy leadership in 2007 and – more significantly – the fact that many feel the party's very future is now in peril, the Health Secretary may finally be ready to pitch for the top job.

He is a peculiar politician: an affable man with complete control over his own ego, who has risen close to the top of British politics. He is a throwback to a time when union barons could move into politics through the Labour Party. A former joint general secretary of the Communication Workers Union, Mr Johnson is, in fact, the first former union leader in 40 years to become a cabinet minister. More remarkably, in a time of professionalised politics and machine politicians, he did not go to university.

He was a grammar-school boy who was orphaned at 12 and brought up by his elder sister in a council flat; a wannabe rock star who actually cut a record, and a shelf-stacker who became a postman. In short, Johnson, who had three children by his early twenties, boasts much of the "common touch" that his colleagues claim David Cameron lacks.

But he is not quite the working-class hero that many on Labour's left wing crave. As a union leader, Johnson was a moderniser in the Blairite mode and the only union leader to support Tony Blair in his campaign to abolish Clause IV.

In 2007, when he briefly emerged as Gordon Brown's most likely rival, Johnson dismissed the idea of becoming prime minister as similar to "putting the Beagle on to Mars – a nice idea but doomed to failure". It remains a nice idea, but its chances of success have suddenly taken off.

[baldrick]

Much as I dislike and distrust Alan Johnson, he does seem to be coming
over quite well on TV these days.
Very different to how he appeared on the rare occasions when he appeared
when he was CWU General Secretary during the 1996 strikes against the
'Employee Agenda'. Then he looked like a rabbit caught in the headlights
and did not seem at all able to defend the industrial action or put our case forward.

[randompostman]

The man is a chancer and a traitor to the labour movement labour party and the cwu and should be treated as such.