ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

britains flexible workforce

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Re: britains flexible workforce

Post by BELIAL »

pocky20 wrote:well i know that some of the works if not all turned down perm jobs at mini coz the temp jobs they had payed better so they did have a choice in the mater sorry for them but i would have took a perm job even if it ment i was geting a bit less money .and also some temp workers .and this is true still get dhss money as they are hard to trace fact. :no no
Amazing :shock: So you know for a fact that a profit driven enterprise was willing to fork out more for a temporary workforce and then add the agency cut on top to make it even more expensive. To cap it all the taxpayer subsidizes these higher earners .
Altruism is alive and well :chuckle What a crock of shite :chuckle
Bye
Night Tonic
Posts: 1474
Joined: 23 Oct 2007, 21:35

Re: britains flexible workforce

Post by Night Tonic »

borders wrote:
Night Tonic wrote:Duffel coats - lol
Duffel Coats -------
"For more than a century, warm, windproof and robust duffel coats have been worn by the armed forces in battles on land and sea. Their most famous military wearer was undoubtedly Field Marshal Montgomery, who changed his army greatcoat for a standard issue duffel so that he would appear no different from his men, and to demonstrate his affection for his troops." --- leader of men :hmmmm :hmmmm what do you reckon Mr NT
Also standard issue for ditch-diggers. Still think its funny - describes those 'crawl out of the woodwork' leeches well.
Don't believe everything you're told in the rest room
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Re: britains flexible workforce

Post by BELIAL »

Night Tonic wrote:
borders wrote:
Night Tonic wrote:Duffel coats - lol
Duffel Coats -------
"For more than a century, warm, windproof and robust duffel coats have been worn by the armed forces in battles on land and sea. Their most famous military wearer was undoubtedly Field Marshal Montgomery, who changed his army greatcoat for a standard issue duffel so that he would appear no different from his men, and to demonstrate his affection for his troops." --- leader of men :hmmmm :hmmmm what do you reckon Mr NT
Also standard issue for ditch-diggers. Still think its funny - describes those 'crawl out of the woodwork' leeches well.
:hmmmm you didn't really mean to label manual workers as blood sucking parasites did you? I mean given the fact that Nige and Peregrine and the rest of the masters of the universe have just come 'cap' in hand for £500 billion of us taxpayers cash that would be a bit rich :chuckle
Ps Leeches = ponds, ditches usually shallow stagnant water. Woodwork = my moneys on deathwatch or click beetles :d'oh!
Bye
axeman
Posts: 1733
Joined: 12 Jun 2007, 17:57

Re: britains flexible workforce

Post by axeman »

Night Tonic wrote:
borders wrote:
Night Tonic wrote:Duffel coats - lol
Duffel Coats -------
"For more than a century, warm, windproof and robust duffel coats have been worn by the armed forces in battles on land and sea. Their most famous military wearer was undoubtedly Field Marshal Montgomery, who changed his army greatcoat for a standard issue duffel so that he would appear no different from his men, and to demonstrate his affection for his troops." --- leader of men :hmmmm :hmmmm what do you reckon Mr NT
Also standard issue for ditch-diggers. Still think its funny - describes those 'crawl out of the woodwork' leeches well.

and we know who the leeches are within royal fail don't we...........and there advocates reside here :left:
Tman
Posts: 4134
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Re: britains flexible workforce

Post by Tman »

"TrueBlueTerrier"]You feel the sympathy flowing can't you :roll: .

Hey Tricky, why bring it down to a personal level?


The thing with the car workers is not that they were dismissed but how they were.
Cobblers. A bunch of flowers and a "Goodbye" card would have made unemployment acceptable then, would it? :arrrghhh
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72603
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: britains flexible workforce

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Tman wrote:"TrueBlueTerrier"]You feel the sympathy flowing can't you :roll: .
Hey Tricky, why bring it down to a personal level?
It was not meant to be some aren't showing any sympathy and some are if you take that personally I cant help that. Also Teebs or TrueBlue or even TBT - Not tricky please.
Tman wrote:The thing with the car workers is not that they were dismissed but how they were.
Cobblers. A bunch of flowers and a "Goodbye" card would have made unemployment acceptable then, would it? :arrrghhh
Course not but you taking my comment out of context and denigrating it with such a comment adds nothing to your position does it.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
borders
Posts: 1303
Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 09:10

Re: britains flexible workforce

Post by borders »

Night Tonic wrote:
borders wrote:
Night Tonic wrote:Duffel coats - lol
Duffel Coats -------
"For more than a century, warm, windproof and robust duffel coats have been worn by the armed forces in battles on land and sea. Their most famous military wearer was undoubtedly Field Marshal Montgomery, who changed his army greatcoat for a standard issue duffel so that he would appear no different from his men, and to demonstrate his affection for his troops." --- leader of men :hmmmm :hmmmm what do you reckon Mr NT
Also standard issue for ditch-diggers. Still think its funny - describes those 'crawl out of the woodwork' leeches well.
another worthless post , with not much thought put into it, you really need to step up to the mark, Mr NT.
"why should it just be the bankers, politicians and the idle rich who get all the best things ? we demand a standard of living for our members that enables them to share in the fine wines and times that the likes of Cameron and his Eton buddies take for granted " - the late great Bob Crow RIP.
Tman
Posts: 4134
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Re: britains flexible workforce

Post by Tman »

Tman"]The thing with the car workers is not that they were dismissed but how they were.
Cobblers. A bunch of flowers and a "Goodbye" card would have made unemployment acceptable then, would it? :arrrghhh Course not but you taking my comment out of context and denigrating it with such a comment adds nothing to your position does it.
It wasn't meant to. It was just highlighting the daft assertion that it was how the dismissals were carried out that was the problem, and not the dismissals themselves. Hardly "out of context" either, as you can see above.
andy2007
Posts: 3971
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 10:16
Gender: Male
Location: Earth

Re: britains flexible workforce

Post by andy2007 »

Tman wrote:"TrueBlueTerrier"]You feel the sympathy flowing can't you :roll: .

Hey Tricky, why bring it down to a personal level?


The thing with the car workers is not that they were dismissed but how they were.
Cobblers. A bunch of flowers and a "Goodbye" card would have made unemployment acceptable then, would it? :arrrghhh
The point is, that finding out at the end of your final shift, gives you NO CHANCE OF MAKING APPROPRIATE PLANS. A week, or at least a couple of days, gives you a chance to get on to the Agency about getting another position. There may not be any at the time. But the sooner they find out you need one, the sooner you'll get whatever becomes available. Even a few days less on the Dole makes a big difference to your self esteem, and the financial burden on other Taxpayers. :hmmmm

It's the total lack of consideration for the PEOPLE who are working for them (albeit via an Agency). They were treated like a commodity, rather than a group of people. :hmmmm
Don't knock Insanity
it's just another outlook on Reality!
axeman
Posts: 1733
Joined: 12 Jun 2007, 17:57

Re: britains flexible workforce

Post by axeman »

Thinking along lines of dissmissal how many area managers , managers are getting the chop as we move to 'areas' as we know a lot are on contracts from a month upwards
pocky20
Posts: 107
Joined: 14 Jan 2009, 21:51
Gender: Male

Re: britains flexible workforce

Post by pocky20 »

linkinpark wrote:
pocky20 wrote:well i know that some of the works if not all turned down perm jobs at mini coz the temp jobs they had payed better so they did have a choice in the mater sorry for them but i would have took a perm job even if it ment i was geting a bit less money .and also some temp workers .and this is true still get dhss money as they are hard to trace fact. :no no
"Some of the works if not all turned down perm jobs" Yeah right thats gonna happen.LOL.
Aint it funny how so many people know someone fiddling the DSS but never think to report them? Maybe they read the Mail and believe every bit of trash written by those neo nazis or were just out on the sauce this afternoon?

:crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
its true they wanted to stays temps.not all of them some of them.i pointed this this out to a guy as i did not understand ut to and he said it was true.and as to fiddling the dhss its not up to me to report onthem as sometime you can because of where you live same a xmas temps there was at lest 8 i know of who came in and where still geting the dhss. matbe people dont do it where you live but it happens here.and not just a few weeks here and there i know of one guy who i talk to was at it for well lets just say a long time nuff said :no no
norbert
Posts: 3027
Joined: 15 Jan 2008, 01:46

Re: britains flexible workforce

Post by norbert »

pocky20 wrote:
linkinpark wrote:
pocky20 wrote:well i know that some of the works if not all turned down perm jobs at mini coz the temp jobs they had payed better so they did have a choice in the mater sorry for them but i would have took a perm job even if it ment i was geting a bit less money .and also some temp workers .and this is true still get dhss money as they are hard to trace fact. :no no
"Some of the works if not all turned down perm jobs" Yeah right thats gonna happen.LOL.
Aint it funny how so many people know someone fiddling the DSS but never think to report them? Maybe they read the Mail and believe every bit of trash written by those neo nazis or were just out on the sauce this afternoon?

:crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
its true they wanted to stays temps.not all of them some of them.i pointed this this out to a guy as i did not understand ut to and he said it was true.and as to fiddling the dhss its not up to me to report onthem as sometime you can because of where you live same a xmas temps there was at lest 8 i know of who came in and where still geting the dhss. matbe people dont do it where you live but it happens here.and not just a few weeks here and there i know of one guy who i talk to was at it for well lets just say a long time nuff said :no no
Building Trade is famous for " the lump " , when the place were I had to misfortune to work at , was being built , a lot of the lads downed tools every other Monday to sign on . It was rife during the Builder's Strike in 1974 , most of those true blue big companies knew it and encouraged it .

It wasn't stamped on from a great height for nothing , what with the Shrewsbury 3 or 4 etc .

Everyone has a friend of a friend etc who can tell stories . With the Social , it's more putting adverts on the telly to put the sh*** up people , the reality is that it costs money to chase these people and it's deemed better to chase the real p*** takers , like the blokes missus who was on IB , but was acting as a builder's labourer . The Black Economy will always exist - big deal
Night Tonic
Posts: 1474
Joined: 23 Oct 2007, 21:35

Re: britains flexible workforce

Post by Night Tonic »

borders wrote:another worthless post , with not much thought put into it, you really need to step up to the mark, Mr NT.
Surely you're not advocating standards now. That would be funnier still.

Or is it a difficulty in handling the fact that some see the duffel coated socialist workers as just plain amusing. Fail to see where 'the working man' and the SWs can be confused in the same breath. The fact they're able to turn up at a moments notice would illustrate quite clearly whether they work or not.

Come to think of it, in 40 odd years I've only ever met one working SW - rest stay at home watching bargain hunt or Jeremy Kyle until the call comes to man a brazier at some picket line they've never heard of. Next it'll be 'but at least we had our heads held high' and other such self-indulgent and pointless cliches. Standards? Pah! And funnier still if such a standard, if it existed, was based on Mr Agent's own.
Don't believe everything you're told in the rest room
borders
Posts: 1303
Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 09:10

Re: britains flexible workforce

Post by borders »

what is funny is your posts, the SWP has a layer of people that are paid an average wage to work for the party , no different to any other party. these are the people that you may see on picket lines or on demos etc. there are several SWP members in our office , some are Reps who again you would see on the picket line etc. point to note-- none of them wear DUFFEL COATS.
"why should it just be the bankers, politicians and the idle rich who get all the best things ? we demand a standard of living for our members that enables them to share in the fine wines and times that the likes of Cameron and his Eton buddies take for granted " - the late great Bob Crow RIP.
axeman
Posts: 1733
Joined: 12 Jun 2007, 17:57

Re: britains flexible workforce

Post by axeman »

It does seem as if you think just because someone wears a duffel coat they are of a lower class that yourself ? or is it just because they have a self belief and wont be pushed around by the likes of what you stand for :wink: