ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Postman Pat firm fined 245,000

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72597
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Postman Pat firm fined 245,000

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7847705.stm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The firm which owns the rights to TV shows such as Postman Pat and Basil Brush has been fined £245,000 the Financial Services Authority (FSA).

Entertainment Rights was found guilty of delaying releasing information which could have affected its share price.

It followed a change in a distribution contract which reduced its estimated profits for 2008 by $13.9m (£10.2m).

The company took 78 days to make a stock market announcement, which then prompted shares to fall by 55%.

"Entertainment Rights considered that there would be future opportunities to reduce the impact of the variation and as such delayed making an announcement," the FSA said.

But it said that the development was "inside information and should have been disclosed to the market as soon as possible".

The fine comes days after City watchdog fined Wolfson Microelectronics £140,000 after it failed to give the market price sensitive as soon as possible.

Last year, Woolworths was fined £350,000 for failing to reveal that EUK, its distribution arm before it went into administration, had lost a major contract with Tesco.

In December Entertainment Rights, which also owns rights to Rupert Bear and The Lone Ranger said the collapse of Woolworths had left it around £800,000 out of pocket.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.