ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Long Term Health problems.

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Caticus
Posts: 14
Joined: 11 Sep 2008, 00:13
Gender: Female

Long Term Health problems.

Post by Caticus »

I have a query, if a flare-up of a long-term health condition (which work is aware of) temporarily prevents me from being able to complete a duty, am I within my rights to still attend work & do what I am able to do e.g. Prep & other indoor duties, or take just half a round, or is my only option to go off sick even though I could still perform part of my job & get paid for doing something rather getting paid for doing nothing at all. Also baring in mind that I am only on a 25 hour contract which means once I've finished prepping in, there's very rarely enough time to complete a full delivery in my time anyway.

I suggested this to my manager but was told that if I am not fit enough to complete a full delivery then I shouldn't come to work, even though other people with various other illnesses or injuries are on 'light' duties to enable them to recover properly before commencing full duties.
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Long Term Health problems.

Post by DGP1 »

Play them at their own game, if your only paid for 25 hours then only work your 25 hours eg. go in, prep your frame, pull it out then tell your manager that you're unable to complete and only take out enough to take you to your time.
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
dinho1
Posts: 156
Joined: 24 Feb 2007, 20:26
Location: e mids

Re: Long Term Health problems.

Post by dinho1 »

agree with disgruntled , just work your contracted hours , and if that means bringing back mail so be it . the other worrying option for you would be I H R (ill health retirement) if you continue to do "light duties". if your illness is a direct result of royal mail then you could go sick till you are 100% fit . otherwise if it is not a direct result you have to consider if you go off sick , return , then go off sick again this is going to trigger off stages.
all in all if you feel ok doing 25 hrs per week then just do 25 hrs. use correct equipment dont cut corners etc.
hope this helps you to make a decision :wave
pinstripe
Posts: 2469
Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
Gender: Male
Location: 2 left turns from reality

Re: Long Term Health problems.

Post by pinstripe »

A few months ago we were told that RM would write to your GP to let them know that deliveries were not the only type of work available. The thinking behind it was that so many staff were off sick and while they may not be able to do a delivery there was other types of 'in-house' work that they could do. We were also told that this was nationwide. I'd get my rep involved as you are willing to attend work but are being prevented from doing so and are therefore likely to trigger the stage warnings. Why should you be put in this position, where you could easily be forced out of your job due to unsatisfactory attendance when you have clearly indicated your willingness to work.
ar26
Posts: 155
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 19:55
Gender: Male

Re: Long Term Health problems.

Post by ar26 »

Our office seemingly no longer has any light duties, so if in a similar situation to the poster I to would prob be in the same boat. Only guy I know who got on light deliveries was when he broke his leg badly on his first day out as a postman due to black ice and a bad fall.
madelin4
Posts: 1220
Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 16:56

Re: Long Term Health problems.

Post by madelin4 »

No one is mention here about resonable adjustments for people with long term health issuse??
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Long Term Health problems.

Post by DGP1 »

madelin4 wrote:No one is mention here about resonable adjustments for people with long term health issuse??
For that to happen you really need to get ATOS involved :shock: afterall they are under orders to get people back to work and if it's only back doing light duties then that is what they'll recommend (whether or not the DOM takes any notice is a different matter).
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72626
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Long Term Health problems.

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Caticus wrote:I have a query, if a flare-up of a long-term health condition (which work is aware of) temporarily prevents me from being able to complete a duty, am I within my rights to still attend work & do what I am able to do e.g. Prep & other indoor duties, or take just half a round, or is my only option to go off sick even though I could still perform part of my job & get paid for doing something rather getting paid for doing nothing at all. Also baring in mind that I am only on a 25 hour contract which means once I've finished prepping in, there's very rarely enough time to complete a full delivery in my time anyway.

I suggested this to my manager but was told that if I am not fit enough to complete a full delivery then I shouldn't come to work, even though other people with various other illnesses or injuries are on 'light' duties to enable them to recover properly before commencing full duties.

Believe it or not in this particular case I would strongly suggest when you next address this problem with the manager (with witnesses of course :Very Happy ) that you request he refer you to ATOS.

Why - well if ATOS agree with you the DOM has to follow their advice or explain why he has not at any future tribunal or investigation. If ATOS disagree with you, well then you really have not lost anything and remain in the same position you are now.

However I would also add that I would ask (and probably pay for) a report from my GP on my condition and his opinion on what tasks I could and couldn't do and any medical recommendations he may have with regard to my work.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Caticus
Posts: 14
Joined: 11 Sep 2008, 00:13
Gender: Female

Re: Long Term Health problems.

Post by Caticus »

Thank you, all, for your advice, it's been very useful! :Very Happy

I think i'll just have to take disgruntledpostie's advice & just stick to my hours, no matter what!
Last edited by Caticus on 08 Jan 2009, 13:05, edited 1 time in total.
postie28
Posts: 372
Joined: 05 Jun 2007, 17:48
Location: in front of me computer supping a can of lager. but shortly going out to the picket line

Re: Long Term Health problems.

Post by postie28 »

well our dom insists we turn up for work even if only 1% fit. bad for his figures if anyone is off sick.
watch out. there may be a dom about
General Mannerheim
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 2299
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 13:10
Gender: Male
Location: Stalag 17

Re: Long Term Health problems.

Post by General Mannerheim »

Feck them!
If they know you have a medical condition you can insist on them finding you another duty to do,you should not be made to go off on the sick and potentially lose money or get a stage just for your condition.
My own arsewipe Dimwit tried this with me and I through the book at him.
Or if you want to double bluff them:
Go to your GP tell him that your condition has flared up and get him to write out a sicknote for as long as possible,I bet you any money your asswipe will offer you light duties.
Fookin w*****s the lot of them.
Royal Mail managers.....about as popular as a t.urd in a swimming pool!
The DDA/Equality Act demands action,NOT words......adjustments NOT Occupational Health referrals.Case No:2505901/09
Royal Mail is an Equal Opportunities Employer..It discriminates against everybody.
mal
Posts: 31
Joined: 08 Apr 2007, 23:29

Re: Long Term Health problems.

Post by mal »

Have a look through this and see if you can see anything which will support your case.I've highlighted and underlined a few parts which may help.Your Rep should have this.



Rehabilitation
PROCESS DEFINITION

This process covers an employee's entry into, progress through, and completion of a period of rehabilitation which is aimed at returning him/her to full capacity for his/her normal work within a reasonable and defined time scale. The process which should commence as soon as it is medically appropriate as advised by EHS ( taking account of external medical opinion ) will normally take effect upon return from long term sick absence but may include any employee for whom an ill health condition (whether physical or psychological ) prevents him/her from doing his/her full range of duties and where rehabilitation is supported by EHS. The process represents a joint approach agreed between Service Delivery, CWU and CMA and should be read in conjunction with the Ill Health Retirement Agreement to which it is closely related.

INPUTS
• Employee report of ill health condition
• Absence record
• Individual risk assessment in the job situation based on consultation with the employee
• Accident report
• Pay details
• EHS assessment of suitability for current duties and advice on capabilities with recommendation for modifications to duties for a specified period.
• Advice to EHS from external doctor (employee's G.P or specialist ) as appropriate at each stage of the process.
• Employee aspirations and any particular skills which may have a bearing on the design of a rehabilitation programme which best matches the individuals needs.
OUTPUTS
• Rehabilitation work assigned as appropriate to the individual circumstances ( this may involve modifications to the individual's existing duty for the duration of the rehabilitation period only, or a change to a different duty or the temporary creation of a specially designed duty ).
Change of work area location (if appropriate) or ( if necessary when rehabilitation work is no longer appropriate, and a return to the individuals normal duty is not practicable ) a permanent change of duty • Earlier and more effective return to work following illness/injury or surgery
• Partial return to work where appropriate
• Health condition not adversely affected by work situation
Employee feels he/she has been treated fairly and has a positive view of Royal Mail as a caring employer ( which together with the way in which the process has been seen to be applied should encourage colleagues to share this view ).
• Royal Mail complies with legal requirement to deal with foreseeable ill health conditions
KEY PRINCIPLES
• Rehabilitation will be considered in all appropriate circumstances consistent with these key principles. Managers should seek to actively encourage entry in to rehabilitation as soon as it is reasonable to do so on the medical advice of EHS.
• Rehabilitation supported by an EHS recommendation is crucial to the speedy return to work of those who have been away on sick absence and the resumption of full duties by employees whose effectiveness has been impeded by an ill health condition , whether the cause is physical or psychological.
• Service Delivery and the CWU and the CMA are committed to work jointly to ensure employees receive the support outlined in these key principles.
• The effective care of employees who have reported an ill health condition which may have been caused or worsened by the work situation
Every effort will be made to identify suitable alternative work or modified duties. The identification and availability of such alternative work or modified duties cannot be guaranteed.
• The employee is entitled to seek the involvement and support of his/her union representative throughout the rehabilitation process.
• The local CWU representative will be consulted where there are operational implications. The CWU rehabilitation representative should be consulted when a temporary change of unit and/or function is being considered. In circumstances where the CWU local representative is unfamiliar with rehabilitation he/she may call upon the support of the CWU rehabilitation representative to assist him / her in dealing with such a case.
• Similarly for a manager returning on rehabilitation, the CMA local and/or rehabilitation representative may become involved as appropriate.
• The regular strategic involvement meetings will when discussing absence support deployment of the rehabilitation process, encourage participation, and consider and review the demand for and overall operation of the process. The CWU / CMA rehabilitation representatives will be invited to attend for that part of the meeting when rehabilitation is being discussed. Figures on the numbers of employees participating in a rehabilitation programme will be shared with the CWU and CMA as part of the Strategic Involvement Process as a matter of good practice.
The preferred approach will normally be for rehabilitation to be undertaken in the employees own office / location where the line manager is familiar with the circumstances and can facilitate appropriate flexibility and adjustments to rehabilitation work to meet changing needs during rehabilitation. It is however recognized that there may be circumstances when placement in a different work location will be necessary to assist recovery • Every effort will be made to encourage and support the employee in resuming full duties when ever possible and as soon as he/she is assessed as fit to do so.
• The rehabilitation programme should not normally exceed three months. Longer periods may be set initially on the basis of a clear EHS recommendation following an accident or injury, or where a phased approach is specifically advised by EHS.
• Employees will be treated with sensitivity. Consideration will be given to personal circumstances throughout to ensure that rehabilitation work offered is suitable and reasonable as well as beneficial for the individual to undertake.
• It is recognized that individuals may not always recover sufficiently within the planned rehabilitation period to enable a return to their normal work when originally anticipated. The process provides for regular monitoring and review and in line with these Key Principles will be applied with flexibility and understanding in such circumstances.
• All information will be treated in strictest confidence.
• Employees have a right of access to personal and medical records under the Data Protection Act. 1998 and Medical Records Act 1988.
Alternative work may include modifications to the content and/or hours of the existing duty or where necessary a change of work area and/or location. The line manager with the support available throughout the process will give reassurance as appropriate on any concerns the employee may have ( for example on pay ) and undertake to obtain answers to any questions that could not be dealt with immediately.
• Redeployment ( permanent change of duty ) may arise as an option to be considered in the context of the rehabilitation process only when rehabilitation is not recommended by EHS at initial assessment or upon subsequent review where rehabilitation is not progressing as anticipated and a modified programme is not appropriate or practicable.
• The Way Forward Agreement gives employees returning to work on a rehabilitation programme some measure of protection against a possible loss of earnings during a rehabilitation programme. (See Note 4 to Rehabilitation process first section and Cross References ).

* Notes

1. The initial assessment is common to a range of absence management processes. Line managers should clearly indicate the reason for referral and the advice being sought The EHS appointment is booked by Transaction Services and confirmed to the line manager who should provide support and guidance to encourage the employee to attend the appointment. Referral to EHS may arise because of long term illness or following an accident or injury or as part of personnel procedures or through self referral. Rehabilitation may be identified as a possibility by the line manager or may be identified and recommended by EHS on the basis of the assessment.
2. The rehabilitation process is appropriate when recommended by EHS for an employee who is expected to benefit from a period of modified duties to assist him/her in returning to full normal duties within a defined and agreed time scale.
3. The rehabilitation process normally applies to employees returning to work after a period of sick absence. It may also be applied although the employee remains at work, when an employee or his/her line manager identifies a work problem which may be related to a health condition, and which is affecting performance or creating a risk to the employee or his/her colleagues. Referral to EHS may be triggered by an employee request, or by the Line Manager, an EHS interview, following receipt of a GPs certificate, or at a case conference where all cases of long term absence are regularly reviewed. It may be particularly appropriate in safety critical jobs. The Employee may also seek advice from his/her Union representative who may raise the issue with the Line Manager on the employees behalf and may accompany the employee.

*
1. The Recommendations for Rehabilitation form (Annex 1 ) as received from EHS is a confidential assessment intended to be shared between the individual employee , his/her line manager and Personnel. It is not a medical report but advises specifically on the practical constraints on capability during the rehabilitation period and on the most appropriate rehabilitation programme in the circumstances
2. There must always be a current clear EHS recommendation and support for the employee's entry into a formal rehabilitation programme. EHS will advise the line manager and copy this advice to Personnel ( normally the Employment Policy manager ) where a record of each rehabilitation in progress is kept and an overall rehabilitation plan maintained . Exceptionally EHS may recommend either initially or upon subsequent review that a permanent change of job is required. This may arise where a lasting disability is confirmed. Rehabilitation is not open ended and follows a standard sequence, from entry requested, through monitoring to resumption of normal duties. If resumption of normal duties is not possible then a management decision on the way forward is required. It will always be a management decision taking full account of relevant EHS recommendations to relocate, redeploy or consider application of other standard processes.
3. Line Manager to contact Employee as soon as reasonably practicable following receipt of EHS advice .
4. Line manager discusses with the employee the rehabilitation process on the basis of recommendations received from EHS, including the start date, any planned phasing, the probable rehabilitation period, type of work, hours/days of attendance and completes the Recommendations for Rehabilitation form ( Annex1). This must be accompanied by an assessment of the risks associated with the proposed tasks against the requirements of the individual using the standard form (DOC Link). Appropriate assurances on pay should also be given at this stage . The following principles apply; (a) where an individual is offered rehabilitation he/she will be paid at his/her normal contracted rate of pay ( weekly / monthly ) when the hours performed is less than his/her contracted hours of attendance; (b) the eight week rule introduced by Way Forward will be honoured to ensure that those individuals returning to work within eight weeks, to a duty which would attract a lower level of allowance payment than their normal attendance, are not financially disadvantaged by returning to work on rehabilitation; (c ) once the eight week period has elapsed any employee returning to work will only be paid the allowances proper to the full time shift pattern allocated to the individual for the purpose of rehabilitation pro rata to the hours of their actual attendance ( e.g. where a night shift worker resumes on rehabilitation to an "early" late shift which normally qualifies for a shift payment but the individual works a reduced number of hours on each shift the payment is made pro rata to the actual hours of attendance.)
5. Where an employee is assessed as disabled or where an employee with a previously recognised disability is entering a rehabilitation programme ( whether or not related to his/her recognised disability ) advice may also be sought from the Disability Advice Centre ( DAC ). Reference should also be made to the relevant policy guidelines.

*
1. The line manager may seek advice and guidance from personnel at any stage of the rehabilitation process. This may include advice on whether the potential benefits of the proposed programme (reduced absence, useful work undertaken and earlier return to normal duties) are realistic and practicable in the circumstances. The line manager in the first instance will seek to find alternative work in his/her own office and will discuss operational implications with the local union representative. When the line manager is unable to facilitate suitable rehabilitation arrangements in his/her local office he/she will liaise with the SOM, MCM, the CWU Area Rehab representative and the CMA as appropriate to identify suitable work in an acceptable location within that area.
2. If suitable work is not available then consideration should be given to the creation of special duties where practicable.
3. If the employee is placed on a rehabilitation programme in a different office the employee should be reimbursed for any excess travel costs in line with business travel policy. Where an employee is placed on a rehabilitation programme at a different office and resumes to full time hours, any additional travel time incurred in excess of 30 minutes per day should be discounted from the full time duty hours rather than claimed as single rate overtime. ( Travelling time of less than 30 minutes per day is disregarded).
4. Reasons given may include both medical and social [ e.g. domestic situation ] where further EHS input on occupational health and/or welfare issues should be sought as appropriate. The advice provided by EHS may relate to capability which may require a revision of the rehabilitation programme, and /or social factors for which adjustments might reasonably be made. It may also include fitness for a possible early return to normal work, or recommendations concerning the need for a permanent job change. EHS will seek further advice and clarification from the employee's GP or specialist as necessary throughout the process and take full account of any reports received from them before making their recommendation.

5. This will employ standard format letters [ DOC Link] including all relevant details. Full information on financial ( including pensionable ) implications should be provided in writing at this stage. Transaction Services should be advised accordingly. Personnel will advise on the use of the standard letters as required. Where a revised rehabilitation programme has been agreed the line manager will also write to confirm the details in the same way. The process throughout must be fully documented ( correspondence should be copied to personnel ).

*
1 The line manager has primary responsibility for the establishment and operation of individual rehabilitation programmes. Personnel will provide advice and guidance throughout and will monitor progress against the rehabilitation plan for the area. Where the attendance times for the proposed rehabilitation programme will result in the individual working to more than one line manager, it will normally be the manager who oversees the majority of the duty who will have overall responsibility for managing the individual including completing the Monitoring of Rehabilitation Process Discussion form taking input from the other managers involved. ( See Section D of the rehabilitation process )
2 The extent of training needs should be considered at an early stage to ensure that the requirement is not excessive given the short duration of rehabilitation work.
3. Once the employee has accepted the rehabilitation programme and returns to work he/she will be regarded as having returned from sick leave.
4. Partial returns to work should be allocated proportionately between work and non work hours on the balance of staff. However the non work element will not be recorded as sick absence on the employees sick absence record.
5. Where an employee returns to work on less than the scheduled hours for the duty, the balance of the hours not worked by that person will be classed as absence and therefore excluded from the PBS calculations, provided that the hours are not covered in any other way.

*
1. Where the employee does not accept the rehabilitation offer or where no suitable alternative work can be found all the available options should be explored with the individual and documented. If rehabilitation has been declined the employee's reasons should be fully explored and documented to minimise any risk to the employee's health or to the health and safety of colleagues
2. Where the offer of a rehabilitation programme is unacceptable to the individual, he / she may appeal against the suitability of the work being offered including the proposed hours of work and date of return. Appeals will follow the process described in section 10.1 of the Ill Health Agreement. As set out in section 10.2 of that Agreement the outcome of the appeal will be one of the following:
(a) The appeal is upheld and appropriate adjustments are made. ( section 10.2.(a) )
(b) The appeal is upheld but it is not possible to make the appropriate adjustments ( section 10.2 (b)
(c) The appeal fails ( section 10.2 ( c)
3. If the employee proposes an immediate return to work rather then continuing rehabilitation EHS advice should be sought if there is any doubt about the employees fitness to resume his/her normal duties.
4. Normal duties must not be commenced or resumed against EHS advice. Further advice may be sought from EHS as necessary and the position kept under review.

*
1. Overtime will not be authorised until the employee returns to working his/her normal contracted hours. Where an increase in the hours worked under rehabilitation is proposed this should be considered as part of the regular review process and EHS endorsement obtained before any change is implemented. When an employee on a rehabilitation programme who is working his / her normal hours wishes to undertake overtime working a decision should be made on a case by case basis and authorised only where this is compatible with EHS recommendations for the rehabilitation programme and all constraints on the employee's work hours and tasks are complied with so as not to impede recovery and return to full normal duties
2. Discussion to be held in private with the employee. An informal check should be made at appropriate intervals with a more formal recorded assessment each month or at agreed milestones. The purpose is to monitor progress towards a return to full duties in line with agreed time scales and to identify the need for further EHS input and /or changes in programme.
3. Any concerns expressed at the reviews should be referred to EHS. The case will be reviewed at the monthly case conference throughout the rehabilitation period ( normally up to three months but exceptionally longer periods may be agreed when specifically recommended by EHS - see Key Principles ). Review dates and date of resumption of normal duties will be as recorded ( or updated ) in the overall rehabilitation plan maintained by personnel.
4. Limited progress may be due to overestimating an individual's capability given the employee's physical/ psychological state and/or inappropriate job or hours of work. The rehabilitation period may require adjustments to job content or hours of attendance in the light of experience and EHS recommendations or a gradual build up may be incorporated in the initial rehabilitation plan and adjusted if necessary according to progress.
5. Where it is not thought that satisfactory progress can be achieved and maintained then on the advice of EHS the alternative of a new permanent job should be considered with employee. In the case of a disabled employee the requirements of the DDA with regard to adjustments to the job must be considered at each stage.
6. After all relevant rehabilitation / ill health issues have been progressed to a satisfactory conclusion and the EHS is satisfied that the employee has recovered fully, then if the employee is not performing to a satisfactory level an appropriate report should be made to personnel. It may then be necessary to consider redeployment, permanent work adjustments for disability or in some circumstances the application of NCI/ IPP.

*
1. The procedure is described in the Risk Assessment Manual.
2. Personnel will maintain a diary to prompt referral to EHS at appropriate intervals. EHS will advise if / when health monitoring is no longer required.
3. Options under permanent job change may include reduced hours with appropriate adjustments to pay.

*
1. For health and safety purposes personnel will diary and flag on HR system for referral at annual intervals until EHS determine that monitoring is on longer necessary

Achieving Royal Mail Standards

Attendance Agreement

Attendance Procedure

Consignia Customer Management Attendance Procedure

Employment Security

HWDC Agreement

Ill-health retirement

Managing The Surplus Framework

Pay & Major Change (19/12/03)

Pay and Grading

Pilot Attendance Procedure

Rehabilitation

Royal Mail Conduct Code

Telewest Agreement

The Way Forward

Vehicle Services IR Framework

Way of Working

Working Time
Caticus
Posts: 14
Joined: 11 Sep 2008, 00:13
Gender: Female

Re: Long Term Health problems.

Post by Caticus »

Very interesting reading, thanks for that Mal. :Very Happy

I think I'll print it off, as it looks like I'm going to need extra Ammo, as atm my Manager once again seems to be ignoring ATOS's recommendations, think the're tryinng to grind me down, but I'm not going to let them win! :evil/mad
shelanda
Posts: 422
Joined: 19 May 2007, 20:44
Location: south east

Re: Long Term Health problems.

Post by shelanda »

Strange isn't it when ATOS go against the Drs they believe every word, when they uphold it they can't accept it, favourite is to keep sending you back hoping you will come up against someone that will say what they want to hear.
madelin4
Posts: 1220
Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 16:56

Re: Long Term Health problems.

Post by madelin4 »

General Mannerheim wrote:Feck them!
If they know you have a medical condition you can insist on them finding you another duty to do,you should not be made to go off on the sick and potentially lose money or get a stage just for your condition.
My own arsewipe Dimwit tried this with me and I through the book at him.
Or if you want to double bluff them:
Go to your GP tell him that your condition has flared up and get him to write out a sicknote for as long as possible,I bet you any money your asswipe will offer you light duties.
Fookin w*****s the lot of them.

What if the alternative duties are in another office and hours or location does not suit a person, what then?????