ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

LTB 176/26 – Incentive Scheme for Delivery Units

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
scotchy1962
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 853
Joined: 25 Mar 2020, 16:55
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 176/26 – Incentive Scheme for Delivery Units

Post by scotchy1962 »

Martin Walsh wrote:
21 Jun 2026, 09:36
The union is never going to agree individual performance standards so there will never be an agreed individual bonus scheme.

This as all bonus schemes have been in the past are self funded.

This one is simply a cost per items scheme. So in scope budget divided by weighted traffic equals cost per items. Reduce cost per item equals a bonus of which 30% is guaranteed, the remaining 70% based on the unit achieving the individual units current quality standards.

USO is expected to reduce budget. Parcels are still growing which potentially means cost per item will reduce.

We all know that one of managements priorities at all levels is to achieve budget. If they are within budget than our members for the first time will get an opportunity to recieve a payment.

In the past Royal Mail benefited from being within budget budget now our members will get the opportunity.

The bonus scheme does not change the fact that full office resourcing is a requirement under DM26.
What bonus scheme are you talking about? Any in my time were BS.
No bonus scheme ever existed that couldn't be manipulated so that you just missed out on that bonus, might be cynical of me but true.
Maybe this time they will do what they say, but i doubt it.
But the lure of a few sheckles more will entice some idiots to run around like headless chickens in a attempt to meet some unachievable target and abuse anyone who doesn't. That'll help stress levels won't it.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16429
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: LTB 176/26 – Incentive Scheme for Delivery Units

Post by clashcityrocker »

scotchy1962 wrote:
23 Jun 2026, 17:17

No bonus scheme ever existed that couldn't be manipulated so that you just missed out on that bonus, might be cynical of me but true.
That is untrue.
Some offices are still receiving hundreds of pounds each year from the PBS/ICS
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
scotchy1962
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 853
Joined: 25 Mar 2020, 16:55
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 176/26 – Incentive Scheme for Delivery Units

Post by scotchy1962 »

clashcityrocker wrote:
23 Jun 2026, 18:31
scotchy1962 wrote:
23 Jun 2026, 17:17

No bonus scheme ever existed that couldn't be manipulated so that you just missed out on that bonus, might be cynical of me but true.
That is untrue.
Some offices are still receiving hundreds of pounds each year from the PBS/ICS
You really do have to stop with the PBS/ICS stuff, very few people, except you, know what that means, spell it out.
I said manipulated so that you just missed out, i didn't say nobody gets it.
qwerty2
Posts: 1986
Joined: 30 Jun 2009, 00:42
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 176/26 – Incentive Scheme for Delivery Units

Post by qwerty2 »

postmanplod2026 wrote:
23 Jun 2026, 16:57
what happens when the part timers who stay part time cant complete, they should be part time walks for this new model not just same s**t show all designed for full time deliverys, be same old story s**t show, part timers coming in 1 hour and 45 mins after full timers what chance u got
All PT should be paired with FT where possible
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16429
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: LTB 176/26 – Incentive Scheme for Delivery Units

Post by clashcityrocker »

scotchy1962 wrote:
23 Jun 2026, 20:01

You really do have to stop with the PBS/ICS stuff, very few people, except you, know what that means, spell it out.
I said manipulated so that you just missed out, i didn't say nobody gets it.
You really need to stop making statements about things you have little or no knowledge of.
Which bonus schemes have been manipulated? Spell them out.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
goldy2007
Posts: 94
Joined: 20 Jun 2025, 23:00
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 176/26 – Incentive Scheme for Delivery Units

Post by goldy2007 »

clashcityrocker wrote:
23 Jun 2026, 20:45
scotchy1962 wrote:
23 Jun 2026, 20:01

You really do have to stop with the PBS/ICS stuff, very few people, except you, know what that means, spell it out.
I said manipulated so that you just missed out, i didn't say nobody gets it.
You really need to stop making statements about things you have little or no knowledge of.
Which bonus schemes have been manipulated? Spell them out.
I get an Ics payment 1st Friday of the month

It’s stands for interim consolidation scheme

It’s another to some legacy staff who’s offices hit delivery specifications back in the day

Mine is £38
Mr Rush
Posts: 3075
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 176/26 – Incentive Scheme for Delivery Units

Post by Mr Rush »

goldy2007 wrote:
23 Jun 2026, 21:48
It’s stands for interim consolidation scheme
That's a twenty year mystery solved for me. I asked my workplace coach about its appearance on my first payslip and he didn't have a clue.
The machine stops.
goldy2007
Posts: 94
Joined: 20 Jun 2025, 23:00
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 176/26 – Incentive Scheme for Delivery Units

Post by goldy2007 »

Mr Rush wrote:
23 Jun 2026, 22:05
goldy2007 wrote:
23 Jun 2026, 21:48
It’s stands for interim consolidation scheme
That's a twenty year mystery solved for me. I asked my workplace coach about its appearance on my first payslip and he didn't have a clue.
Your office at the time must have been targets
scotchy1962
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 853
Joined: 25 Mar 2020, 16:55
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 176/26 – Incentive Scheme for Delivery Units

Post by scotchy1962 »

clashcityrocker wrote:
23 Jun 2026, 20:45
scotchy1962 wrote:
23 Jun 2026, 20:01

You really do have to stop with the PBS/ICS stuff, very few people, except you, know what that means, spell it out.
I said manipulated so that you just missed out, i didn't say nobody gets it.
You really need to stop making statements about things you have little or no knowledge of.
Which bonus schemes have been manipulated? Spell them out.
The last one they had at xmas a few years back or can you not remember it?
Mysteriously any office in my area always managed to fall short of attaining what was required, even though the office money grabbers were convinced they had made it.
postslippete
Posts: 4106
Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 176/26 – Incentive Scheme for Delivery Units

Post by postslippete »

Still nobody knows what these bonus payments will be?? And staff have no visibility of the office budget.

If I've read this correctly the quality metrics can wipe out 70% of the payment even if the cost target is achieved so that makes it difficult for us to judge whether we are actually making progress towards it. What would it take for these quality metrics to fail? In RM's case, almost anything.

We never had a hope in hell of hitting our targets that Xmas yet another office several miles away which didn't get plundered in the last revision hit all their targets with ease.
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
TopperGas
Posts: 3292
Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 176/26 – Incentive Scheme for Delivery Units

Post by TopperGas »

postslippete wrote:
24 Jun 2026, 22:07
Still nobody knows what these bonus payments will be?? And staff have no visibility of the office budget.

If I've read this correctly the quality metrics can wipe out 70% of the payment even if the cost target is achieved so that makes it difficult for us to judge whether we are actually making progress towards it. What would it take for these quality metrics to fail? In RM's case, almost anything.

We never had a hope in hell of hitting our targets that Xmas yet another office several miles away which didn't get plundered in the last revision hit all their targets with ease.
Why don't they just make it easy i.e. x% of Tracked delivered on time, y% of 1c delivered and z% of 2c delivered on time equals a bonus of £??. That way an office could produce a weekly chart to see if they are on target, as it is it'll just be a complete mystery so no way of knowing if you are on target or not. Plus we have no input if the manager decides to sanction OT to clear work, that's totally down to him/his superiors.
Idk
Posts: 159
Joined: 15 Aug 2024, 17:30
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 176/26 – Incentive Scheme for Delivery Units

Post by Idk »

Or easier still, no bonus. If the company makes a profit as a whole in a financial year we get a better than advertised pay increase for the following year.
oypostie
Posts: 883
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 13:39

Re: LTB 176/26 – Incentive Scheme for Delivery Units

Post by oypostie »

They don't want it to be simple because like holiday pay they don't want you to get it
twoloops
Posts: 1990
Joined: 24 May 2017, 20:52
Gender: Male
Location: Sheffield

Re: LTB 176/26 – Incentive Scheme for Delivery Units

Post by twoloops »

Valentina@1 wrote:
18 Jun 2026, 14:39
“commit to deliver “….disguised as a bonus scheme 💯
Commit to deliver - you can stick that right up your jacksee - keep your bonus b*llocks

You are paid to work a specific number of hours, not to run yourself into the ground to hit an impossible workload.