Sounds like the current government.claretandblue wrote: ↑Yesterday, 19:05It's a surplus, not a deficit. There's loads of money left over from a closed scheme, it should go to the members of that scheme, the union wants to give it to new starters.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Answer a few points
-
smok3y666
- Posts: 716
- Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 10:47
- Gender: Male
Re: Answer a few points
-
hazzeem025
- Posts: 266
- Joined: 11 Oct 2009, 18:09
- Gender: Male
Re: Answer a few points
How can they give it to new starters, if they haven't paid a penny into it? The only people who get it, should be the ones who have paid into it.claretandblue wrote: ↑Yesterday, 19:05It's a surplus, not a deficit. There's loads of money left over from a closed scheme, it should go to the members of that scheme, the union wants to give it to new starters.
-
norris9
- Posts: 2576
- Joined: 27 Feb 2019, 17:32
- Gender: Female
Re: Answer a few points
Why does this Martin Walsh geezer come on here whining about members opinions all the time....
he doesn't care for our opinions....
I'll tell you what has always been downhill is the CWU Live Chat on Youtube. Years ago I made an inoffensive comment criticising something about the CWU and was instantly blocked....shut down and shut up by my own union. I never get personal, or abusive, or swear in any opinions I have.... yet whoever deals with the CWU Youtube chat and blocks people willy-nilly shouldn't be working for the CWU. I cannot ask questions on the live chat, and haven't been able to for years - it's ridiculous. Yet Martin wants to come on here and complain about people having an opinion.... it sums everything up.
The CWU is like Royal Mail, they only have time for YES MEN.
he doesn't care for our opinions....
I'll tell you what has always been downhill is the CWU Live Chat on Youtube. Years ago I made an inoffensive comment criticising something about the CWU and was instantly blocked....shut down and shut up by my own union. I never get personal, or abusive, or swear in any opinions I have.... yet whoever deals with the CWU Youtube chat and blocks people willy-nilly shouldn't be working for the CWU. I cannot ask questions on the live chat, and haven't been able to for years - it's ridiculous. Yet Martin wants to come on here and complain about people having an opinion.... it sums everything up.
The CWU is like Royal Mail, they only have time for YES MEN.
Last edited by norris9 on 04 May 2026, 20:49, edited 1 time in total.
-
claretandblue
- Posts: 871
- Joined: 01 Aug 2007, 12:14
Re: Answer a few points
Exactly.hazzeem025 wrote: ↑Yesterday, 20:35How can they give it to new starters, if they haven't paid a penny into it? The only people who get it, should be the ones who have paid into it.claretandblue wrote: ↑Yesterday, 19:05It's a surplus, not a deficit. There's loads of money left over from a closed scheme, it should go to the members of that scheme, the union wants to give it to new starters.
-
Valentina@1
- Posts: 794
- Joined: 13 Apr 2023, 16:48
- Gender: Male
Re: Answer a few points
Think that was head of coms Chris Webb….not seen him in a a while🫢….maybe he’s preparing this live session for Wednesdaynorris9 wrote: ↑Yesterday, 20:43Why does this Martin Walsh geezer come on here whining about members opinions all the time....
he doesn't care for our opinions....
I'll tell you what has always been downhill is the CWU Live Chat on Youtube. Years ago I made an inoffensive comment criticising something about the CWU and was instantly blocked....shut down and shut up by my own union. I never get personal, or abusive, or swear in any opinions I have.... yet whoever deals with the CWU Youtube chat and blocks people willy-nilly shouldn't be working for the CWU. I cannot ask questions on the live chat, and haven't been able to for years - it's ridiculous. Yet Martin wants to come on here and complain about people having an opinion.... it sums everything up.
The CWU is like Royal Mail, they only have time for YES MEN.
-
Saturn1
- Posts: 49
- Joined: 24 Sep 2025, 16:44
- Gender: Male
Re: Answer a few points
That's a valid point. It's much like the die hard union fan boys, who if you say something that goes against the status quo they'll say something abusive like "well if you don't like it f*** off". The irony being the union has a strong anti-bullying stance but when it comes to quieting any dissenting voices it's different.norris9 wrote: ↑Yesterday, 20:43Why does this Martin Walsh geezer come on here whining about members opinions all the time....
he doesn't care for our opinions....
I'll tell you what has always been downhill is the CWU Live Chat on Youtube. Years ago I made an inoffensive comment criticising something about the CWU and was instantly blocked....shut down and shut up by my own union. I never get personal, or abusive, or swear in any opinions I have.... yet whoever deals with the CWU Youtube chat and blocks people willy-nilly shouldn't be working for the CWU. I cannot ask questions on the live chat, and haven't been able to for years - it's ridiculous. Yet Martin wants to come on here and complain about people having an opinion.... it sums everything up.
The CWU is like Royal Mail, they only have time for YES MEN.
-
TopperGas
- Posts: 3149
- Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
- Gender: Male
Re: Answer a few points
Who paid into it to lead to the surplus, RM or it's members, or a mixture of the two?hazzeem025 wrote: ↑Yesterday, 20:35How can they give it to new starters, if they haven't paid a penny into it? The only people who get it, should be the ones who have paid into it.claretandblue wrote: ↑Yesterday, 19:05It's a surplus, not a deficit. There's loads of money left over from a closed scheme, it should go to the members of that scheme, the union wants to give it to new starters.
-
yellowbelly
- Posts: 3546
- Joined: 23 Jun 2015, 15:51
- Gender: Male
Re: Answer a few points
Colleagues should get a wriggle on and make representations to their branch how they want the branch to vote at:Hyrrokkin wrote: ↑Yesterday, 18:35Pension Surplus- The EP agreement says we will get a share of the pension surplus when the Trustees are satisfied. There are two pension surpluses , the first is from the Care Scheme and the other. Is from the Cash balance which is smaller.
When we get a share it will go into the employee benefit scheme which will also generate 10% of any profit made by the company in future pay rises.
What does that even mean ? Sorry for being thick could someone explain that
This surplus was at risk of going exclusively to EP. At the appropriate point the union and our democratic process including our conference with decide how we use it. There is a motion at this years conference asking the union to use the pension surplus to reduce from 67 to 65 the age under new pension scheme when you receive your full pension.
It would have been doubtful the trustees would have done that-technically yes they could do that...but not very likely unless they were pressured by RM.
I see the CWU have put themselves centre in deciding what happens - what about a vote to members on how they would like their money used.
A choice of options and pension scheme members only vote on how the pension surplus is used.
It is our money
Who exactly asked the CWU to decide what happens to our pension money - members of the scheme certainly did not.
CWU Conference 2026 - 12/5 to 14/5 https://www.cwu.org/event/cwu-biannual-conference/
Agenda Item number 1
CATEGORY A: Conference notes that the RMCPP has an NRA of 67.
The Postal Executive is instructed, working with the CWU Trustees, to
negotiate an NRA of 65, possibly funded by the surplus within the previous
RM pension scheme.
London Phoenix
-
Gary55
- Posts: 318
- Joined: 29 Jun 2021, 21:02
- Gender: Male
- Location: london
Re: Answer a few points
f***ing theiving fat bastards . Been in the union nearly 40 years can't believe they are stitching up old staff hoping new staff will join on the back of us getting robbed
-
hero22
- Posts: 564
- Joined: 21 Mar 2016, 19:48
- Gender: Male
Re: Answer a few points
Cheers. How long ago was it closed ?
Seems crazy to even think of giving money to new starts when it belongs to others.
Seems crazy to even think of giving money to new starts when it belongs to others.
-
hero22
- Posts: 564
- Joined: 21 Mar 2016, 19:48
- Gender: Male
Re: Answer a few points
smok3y666 wrote: ↑Yesterday, 19:28Sounds like the current government.claretandblue wrote: ↑Yesterday, 19:05It's a surplus, not a deficit. There's loads of money left over from a closed scheme, it should go to the members of that scheme, the union wants to give it to new starters.
![]()