ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72180
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

https://www.itv.com/news/2026-03-11/mps ... se-parcels

Image

MPs have accused Royal Mail of “lying” about its performance and “pretending” not to prioritise parcels over letters.

It comes after concerns Royal Mail is not meeting Ofcom targets for timeliness in its deliveries, potentially leading to millions of letters arriving late.

Labour MP Dave Robertson said people in his constituency are “sick of being lied to by Royal Mail”.

The Lichfield MP said on Wednesday: “I met Royal Mail just before Christmas to complain to them about the total lack of a postal service that we have in Lichfield. We were probably the worst area in the country at that point.

“I was told when I had that meeting that all of the first class mail went out that week. That is a lie, it is an absolute lie, because my constituents told me. Royal Mail clearly don’t have a handle on this – they are either not measuring their performance or they are covering up their performance.”

Subscribe free to our weekly newsletter for exclusive and original coverage from ITV News. Direct to your inbox every Friday morning.

He called on the government to force Royal Mail to “be honest, ‘fess up and fix it”.

Business minister Blair McDougall said he understands how “frustrating” it is for MPs to “raise a problem and be told that it doesn’t exist”.

“Royal Mail have a responsibility absolutely to address that in a direct and straightforward manner, because if we aren’t recognising the problem, we’ll not deal with it,” he added.

Several MPs alleged Royal Mail prioritises parcels, contributing to the late delivery of letters and leading to some customers missing important information, such as medical appointments.

In a letter published this week by the Commons Business and Trade Committee, chief executive Alistair Cochrane said Royal Mail does not “operate a general policy of prioritising parcel deliveries over letters”.

He said delivering parcels before letters was only prioritised during busy periods like Christmas to avoid them overcrowding delivery offices, but admitted the company does not keep specific data on the number of letters de-prioritised for parcels during these periods.

Liberal Democrat MP Jess Brown-Fuller (Chichester) said the blame for failures "doesn’t lie with postal workers" who are "doing all they can to deliver a service".

“But it lies with a private company that is telling their staff to prioritise parcels and then pretending that that’s not their policy. Constituents in my area of Chichester have received hospital appointments four days after the appointment was due to take place,” she said.

Royal Mail and Ofcom bosses summoned to Parliament over delivery delays

Royal Mail says scrapping of second-class Saturday post must roll out 'urgently'
Labour MP Ian Lavery (Blyth and Ashington), who had raised the urgent question on the matter, said Royal Mail's denial over operating a parcels-first policy was "contradicting repeated internal testimonies" and "flies in the face of local evidence from the workforce”.

It is "a standing joke that the quickest way to get a letter delivered is to put it inside of a parcel", Labour MP Lee Barron (Corby and East Northamptonshire) said.

Responding, Mr McDougall said: “On the issue of the prioritisation of parcels, Ofcom had examined this a few years ago and had found that there wasn’t evidence of it as a policy centrally.

“But I’ve heard from so many members' stories about the prioritisation of parcels, and so it’s something I intend to raise with Ofcom later this afternoon.”
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.May use chatgp to generate posts
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support
Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
Retired
Mr Rush
Posts: 2777
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
Gender: Male

Re: MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by Mr Rush »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
12 Mar 2026, 13:24
chief executive Alistair Cochrane [...] admitted the company does not keep specific data on the number of letters de-prioritised for parcels during these periods.
Count the cut-offs. Isn't that what the DODR is?

Pairing is hammered with packets. Side A goes out. Side B doesn't. Here you go: 700 DPs x 30% callrate = a minimum of 210 de-prioritised letters. They throw numbers at us all the time. This is just being obtuse.
Any Questions?
Yeah, how do I get out of this chickenshit outfit?
scotchy1962
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 804
Joined: 25 Mar 2020, 16:55
Gender: Male

Re: MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by scotchy1962 »

Mr Rush wrote:
12 Mar 2026, 23:10
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
12 Mar 2026, 13:24
chief executive Alistair Cochrane [...] admitted the company does not keep specific data on the number of letters de-prioritised for parcels during these periods.
Count the cut-offs. Isn't that what the DODR is?

Pairing is hammered with packets. Side A goes out. Side B doesn't. Here you go: 700 DPs x 30% callrate = a minimum of 210 de-prioritised letters. They throw numbers at us all the time. This is just being obtuse.
I know sometimes people hammer RM for trying to blind folk with science, now i am sure what you have written means something to some people but if you really want to get your point across you need to use layman terms, i sort of get some of it, the rest is just a bit of a hawkings formula to me.
ted_e_bear
Posts: 3748
Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
Gender: Male

Re: MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by ted_e_bear »

scotchy1962 wrote:
Yesterday, 10:07
Mr Rush wrote:
12 Mar 2026, 23:10
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
12 Mar 2026, 13:24
chief executive Alistair Cochrane [...] admitted the company does not keep specific data on the number of letters de-prioritised for parcels during these periods.
Count the cut-offs. Isn't that what the DODR is?

Pairing is hammered with packets. Side A goes out. Side B doesn't. Here you go: 700 DPs x 30% callrate = a minimum of 210 de-prioritised letters. They throw numbers at us all the time. This is just being obtuse.
I know sometimes people hammer RM for trying to blind folk with science, now i am sure what you have written means something to some people but if you really want to get your point across you need to use layman terms, i sort of get some of it, the rest is just a bit of a hawkings formula to me.
I think DODR is the acronym for whatever the managers report is called so claiming they don't have data for the amount of mail that lies undelivered is also untrue as it should have been reported in the DODR.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72180
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

What is DODR? Internal code meaning: Delivery Office Delivery Review — a hold.

Why is it used? When the Delivery Office cannot deliver due to a lack of resources or operational issues.

Does it apply to letters? Yes it should

Does it apply to parcels? Yes, it should.

Is it a public tracking status? No — it’s internal only.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.May use chatgp to generate posts
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support
Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
Retired
jessicarabbit
Posts: 597
Joined: 05 Nov 2009, 19:57
Gender: Female

Re: MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by jessicarabbit »

Every office has to complete the DODR every day. Delivery Office Daily Report It details which rounds failed completely or in part which feeds into national disruption list that Postman posts daily. All done on percentages. 3 walks uncovered in a 10 walk office is a 30% failure. They also complete a separate report detailing 1c left and number of Delivery points not covered or attempted.

This is where it gets interesting. Some COMs believe (have been told) that if you do the tracked on a delivery you've attempted X number of delivery points on that walk so they don't report it as failing completely. Also some COMs believe (have been told) if you don't prep the round it is a work plan failure and you can report it as mail on hand not due for delivery as it hasn't reached prep stage.

As a wise man once said there are 3 types of lies....Lies, damned lies and statistics.

Every COM (the huge majority) are born liars and they can't tell the truth even if they wanted to as they would be told to re report it in a different way if the OPL was under too pressure to get off the list or show he has control of his COMs.
mrcurve
Posts: 111
Joined: 23 Nov 2011, 19:27
Gender: Male

Re: MPs accuse Royal Mail of ‘lying’ and ‘pretending’ not to prioritise parcels

Post by mrcurve »

I am pretty certain the USO was lost during covid, once the business got use to no longer meet the standards it improved profits, probably why the strikes failed too, hard to put pressure on a business who no longer wanted to meet the USO.
It’s quite expensive to deliver the USO, you need far more staff and vans to deliver every day, other couriers only need to go when someone buys an item, Royal Mail is also stuck delivering all the items customers have not ordered too, bills etc.